Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FYI
1 posted on 05/16/2004 8:57:26 PM PDT by GailA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: GailA

There's plenty of oil, prob is we haven't built a refinery in umpteen years... because of the greens.


2 posted on 05/16/2004 9:04:30 PM PDT by adam_az (Call your State Republican Party office and VOLUNTEER!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GailA
Another action that would benefit the economy and the energy situation would be relaxing some pollution standards so that more coal can be used to generate electricity and by overturning Clinton's making half of southern Utah into a national park. The coal in that part of the country could run coal-fueled power plants with less pollution.

The benefit would come because we are currently using a great deal of natural gas to make power. This demand drives the price of natural gas upwards. The result is that petrochemical facilities that use gas a feedstock or need it for fuel must pay more and are less profitable. When the profit crunch is bad enough, the parent companies move the chemical plants to China, and Americans lose jobs.

I like clean air as much as anyone does, but if I have to choose between less than perfect air, loss of freedom to drive where and when I want, and loss of my job, I'll choose slightly more polluted air. For most of us, the difference between what is allowed now and what we'd see with slightly relaxed standards is a difference that we'd never notice. Those with breathing difficulties might have some problems, but even they will do better in an America that has good jobs as opposed to an America that doesn't have good jobs.

WFTR
Bill

3 posted on 05/16/2004 9:14:04 PM PDT by WFTR (Liberty isn't for cowards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GailA
"Far too much of our supply comes from foreign sources, over which the United States has little or no control.

The solution is equally simple: Increase domestic oil production."

Not so fast. We invest in foreign sources because it is CHEAP. A significant amount of "foreign oil" is pumped by private western countries and they travel the globe to find the cheapest resources. If domestic production was economically beneficial it would be done in a heartbeat.

IMO, bring Iraq online and prohibit its reentry to OPEC.

4 posted on 05/16/2004 9:15:13 PM PDT by endthematrix (To enter my lane you must use your turn signal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

FINDING DEAL$ ON GA$OLINE:
(A work in progress. Please FReepmail other suggestions)


12 Month National Average for Regular Unleaded by AAA.com

5 posted on 05/16/2004 9:16:40 PM PDT by martin_fierro (I'm martin_fierro and I approved this post.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GailA
Americans have every right to be angry, as they watch the rising price of gasoline take a bigger bite out of their paychecks.

I have NO sympathy for any American who complains about the price of gas. Anyone with a little foretsight could have figured out a few years ago that gas prices weren't going to stay low. Instead, too many of us decided to buy the Excursion, the Suburban, the F-350 Super Duty (to drive to work as a commuter vehicle). I see it every day here in Wyoming. Big fragile ego + zero forethought = going into debt for an absurdly large vehicle. Cry me a river.

8 posted on 05/16/2004 9:20:17 PM PDT by arm958
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GailA

...but if we made ethanol out of our millions of tons of agricultural waste, and all that grain we store until it rots, just to keep it off the market..and added a gallon of unleaded per gas tank...we could drive all we want, and our friends in the desert and Venezuela would be out of business.

No ?


10 posted on 05/16/2004 9:37:07 PM PDT by PoorMuttly ("If called, he will run...if cornered, he will bite." - Muttly camgaign slogan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GailA

Executive order; stroke of a pen, law of the land...cool!


16 posted on 05/16/2004 10:39:14 PM PDT by Atchafalaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GailA
Crude prices are only a MINOR contributor to the 2004 rise in Gasoline prices. . .

Estimated 2004 Gasoline Price Breakdown & Margins Details

17 posted on 05/16/2004 10:49:17 PM PDT by paleocon patriarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GailA

Never fear, for John F. Kerry is here, declaring the prospect of lower gasoline prices "outrageous and unacceptable to the American people."


18 posted on 05/16/2004 10:50:51 PM PDT by dufekin (John F. Kerry. Irrational, improvident, backward, seditious.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GailA

On the bright side, this boosts the resale value of my Honda Insight at the very time I'm thinking of selling it due to a move to Montana!


21 posted on 05/16/2004 11:22:28 PM PDT by claudiustg (Go Sharon! Go Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GailA; All
I feel like a prophet:

-Sticker Shock-$3 a gallon gas? Some links--

22 posted on 05/16/2004 11:36:27 PM PDT by backhoe (Just an old Keyboard Cowboy, ridin' the TrackBall into the Sunset...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GailA

Actually, I'd say it's not all the green's fault, it's also the car manufacturers who make gas guzzlers. Though, cars have become much more fuel efficient lately


25 posted on 05/17/2004 12:08:39 AM PDT by Cronos (W2K4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GailA; adam_az; WFTR; endthematrix

Modern coal-fired power-plants are much cleaner than the smoke-belching plants of yesteryear. Still, there is even a better solution: nuclear power.

The US Navy has been operating nuclear power plants safely for many years now. There is no reason for us not to be producing cheap and abundant electricity using emissions-free and fossil-fuel-free nuclear energy. That would free up a lot of oil and natural gas, reduce our dependence on terrorist-supporting nations, reduce overall pollution (including the pet pollutant-of-the-day: greenhouse gases), and alleviate the power-deficit problems that are rapidly growing in this country.

Oh yeah, there is ONE reason for not producing nuclear power: the political activism of the Greens and other Leftists that want to see America re-join the ranks of third-world nations.


26 posted on 05/17/2004 12:32:07 AM PDT by SpyGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GailA

I just realized something based on a couple of articles I read here several months ago. One involved reviving oil exploration in Tennessee, and the other involved a plan to preserve a small area on the Tennessee-Alabama border. It seems that the greenies had the ultimate goal of placing some 3 million acres of the region around the area to be preserved under protected status, including areas which were in the oil article. Imagine placing an area larger than Death Valley National Monument over middle Tennessee and northeast Alabama and make it off limits to oil exploration, or coal mining, or any other development. Do that all over the United States, and you take away any chance to develop oil or coal or any other type of energy because you can't even take it out of the ground. The reason the greenies want to create a 3 million acre preserve to protect an area of a few thousand acres is to prevent development of our resources and further their leftist agenda.


41 posted on 05/17/2004 6:28:40 AM PDT by yawningotter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson