Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2004 Projected Presidential Electoral Votes as of 5/10/2004
TradeSports.com ^ | Monday, May 10, 2004 | Momaw Nadon

Posted on 05/10/2004 9:56:19 AM PDT by Momaw Nadon

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last
To: jdege
excellent, thanks
61 posted on 05/10/2004 3:55:45 PM PDT by boxsmith13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: jdege
this is not a good trend
62 posted on 05/10/2004 3:56:48 PM PDT by boxsmith13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: DM1
Bill Weld was a liberal though, and Massachusetts is not representative of the country.

Then again, don't take my word on the debates though. I thought Gore wiped the floor with Bush in the first debate, and most of the country thought otherwise, so go figure.

63 posted on 05/10/2004 3:58:32 PM PDT by Dan from Michigan ("I bury those cockroaches")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter
"I don't think that is right. undecideds will almost always go to who they think will win. This is why Reagan in 80 won by far more than anyone expected (although they were voting against an incumbent)."

undecideds vote about 2:1 agains hte incumbent/ If Bush is polling under 48%, he'll lose regardless of where Kerry is.
64 posted on 05/10/2004 4:00:14 PM PDT by boxsmith13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: DM1
Kerry believe it or not is a shrewd debater.

I saw those Weld debates, and concur. However, the Kerry of 2004 competing nationally doesn't appear nearly as formidable as Kerry '96 trying to keep a MA Senate seat. He certainly didn't distinguish himself in the Dem debates.

65 posted on 05/10/2004 4:00:37 PM PDT by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket
You would think, in a presidential race, that the undecideds wouldn't swing that much against the incumbent, simply because the challenger is so well-known, unlike most races.
66 posted on 05/10/2004 4:01:49 PM PDT by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
i know weld was a lib but he was better than kerry
heck my pet rock is better than kerry my point was that kerry should not be underestimated
67 posted on 05/10/2004 4:17:07 PM PDT by DM1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Liz; Grampa Dave; Red Badger
Although some felons have been legally disenfranchised, others have not. Specifically, while only four states allow felons to vote while they are in prison, 18 allow felons to vote while they are on parole and 21 allow them to vote while on probation. Only 10 states permanently disenfranchise all felons and another handful do so to some ex-offenders or restore the ability to vote after a time limit:

http://www.straightdope.com/mailbag/mfelonvote.html
68 posted on 05/10/2004 4:43:46 PM PDT by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: LindaSOG
FASCINATING! I wish I understood it!!!!

The political futures traders believe that John Kerry has a 96.6% chance of being the Democratic nominee for President.

They believe that President Bush has a 58.3% chance of winning the Presidential Election on November 2, 2004.

69 posted on 05/10/2004 4:47:00 PM PDT by Momaw Nadon (Goals for 2004: Re-elect President Bush, over 60 Republicans in the Senate, and a Republican House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon; Straight Vermonter; Darth Reagan
here's a composite of trends shown graphically [dates shown are Monday dates]...
    with Beltway Boys (Saturday predictions)...
    with Tradesports (Monday predictions)...
    with FederalReview (Tuesday predictions)...
01.26


 
02.02


 
02.09


 
02.16


 
02.23


 
03.01


 
03.08


 
03.15


 
03.22


 
03.29


 
04.05


 
04.12






 
04.19






 
04.26






 
05.03






prisoner story broke 4/28
and Fed.Rev added Rasmussen
05.10






 


70 posted on 05/11/2004 5:57:17 AM PDT by Future Useless Eater (FreedomLoving_Engineer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Krodg
Not suggesting you should argue unions.
71 posted on 05/11/2004 6:03:18 AM PDT by Badeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: jdege
I think Bush is actually ahead in all three of these states right now, but there hasn't been much polling there (especially by pollsters that aren't Dem friendly), so that's not evident. But it's logical, given that Bush is a little ahead nationally, to expect he would be ahead in these states that were so close last time.
72 posted on 05/11/2004 12:47:37 PM PDT by TomEwall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson