Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Finally, The End Of Canada
FrontPageMag.com ^ | June 7, 2001 | Jamie Glazov

Posted on 05/09/2004 5:42:13 PM PDT by SamAdams76

ALMOST HALF of Canadians believe it is highly likely Canada will join the United States within ten years. That’s what an opinion poll, released on June 3 (2001) by EKOS Research Associates, a Canadian polling and research firm, tells us.

This isn’t really big news. It simply means that almost half of Canadians are willing to reconcile themselves with reality. Let’s face it: globalization is the way of the future. It can’t be stopped. That means that Canada’s destiny – being absorbed into the American empire -- is much closer than we think. As a Canadian, I can hardly wait.

I must admit: the supremacy of globalization and free trade fills me with an intoxicating sense of glee. After all, the victory of unrestrained international capitalism translates into market forces running unhindered in Canada, which, in turn, translates into a diminishment of Canadian "sovereignty" – that absurd joke that has imposed socialized health care, federal funding of bilingualism and multi-culturalism, and other intellectually-bankrupt policies, onto heavily-burdened Canadian taxpayers. Canadian governments will finally have to listen to the market, rather than to leftwing ideologues and elites, and shed the last remnants of the Canadian welfare state. And as multinational corporations gain power, and national barriers come tumbling down, the forces of deregulation and privatization will triumph, leaving Canadian socialism where it belongs – on the ash heap of history.

These developments will yield less government spending and low taxes, which will encourage stimulated savings and investment in the economy, which will mean more economic growth. More growth, meanwhile, will foster new jobs, products and factories, which, in turn, will lead to a better redistribution of wealth, as well as an increase in the standard of living for most Canadian citizens. And as government regulation will almost totally disappear, Canada will lose any ability to control incoming foreign investment. In this way, it will lose its ability to control its own economy – which is good. The pull to the south will become unstoppable.

The benefits of these developments will feed off of themselves. Just think about it: the Canadian government will no longer have an excuse to fund bilingualism, since the market, which reveals the preferences of people better than any government program can, will expose how economically irrational and unpopular it is. Canadian taxpayers will save millions of dollars. But it gets better: with the dismantling of official bilingualism, Quebec will finally come to terms with what it should have come to terms with long ago: it has no place in Canada. The good news, therefore, is that Quebec will finally separate. And good riddance.

And then, the good news really starts: with French Canada finally gone, English Canada will be blessed with losing its last pretence of possessing any unique characteristics whatsoever. With Quebec gone, English Canadians will no longer be able to say, "We’re not like those Americans," without someone else rejoining: "Oh? And how is that?" And there will be no answer, because there will be nothing to say. Canadian nationalists will finally have to admit the bitter truth: that Canadians are Americans in everything but name. The charade of how "we are different" will come to its long-awaited conclusion.

Finally Canadians will be able to free themselves from trying to be patriotic by insulting Americans. In this way, they will stop negatively stereotyping Americans -- a behavior which has always manifested a dark and ugly strain of hatred in the Canadian psyche. It is simply hilarious, in the most tragic sense, how Canadian nationalists have always prided themselves on their politically-correct tolerance and "multi-culturalism," while they have engaged in anti-Americanism -- a disposition, as sociologist Paul Hollander has demonstrated, that is directly related with racism, sexism, and anti-Semitism. In Canada, of course, it has always been legitimate to be a bigot, as long as it has involved hating Americans. We will soon be able to say goodbye to that pathological double-standard.

We will also be able to say goodbye to the endless smug complaining that many Canadians engage in about how "stupid" Americans are – since Americans do not know anything about us. The bottom line is that Americans in Los Angeles and New York City do not need to know anything about Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, nor about anything else Canadian. That’s because, no matter how much the truth hurts, it is still the truth: Canada is boring – always has been and always will be. Whenever I hear a Canadian mocking American ignorance about Canada, I always can’t help picturing some deadbeat loser and unaccomplished writer who keeps all of his works hidden in his desk, and has never published anything, but simultaneously sneers at the world for having never heard his name.

Just imagine all of the pain that we will spare ourselves once we join the United States. We will no longer have to victimize ourselves with those torturous and emotionally-excruciating conversations about Margaret Atwood and Pierre Berton, in which Canadian nationalists show their anti-American stripes by discussing novels that no human being outside of Canada has ever heard of, nor would ever read under sane circumstances. The celebration of mediocrity for the sake of defining ourselves as being "different" from "those Americans" will finally end.

Thus, with the end of Canada, Canadians will finally reconcile themselves to the fact that they have no separate identity, and that the identity that they think they have has actually been defined in negative opposition to Americans. We can finally stop telling ourselves who we are not, and start focusing on who we are: Americans. And when we do this, the Providential Godsend will be delivered: Canadians everywhere will be liberated from the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, an entity that it takes masochism to tune into, and that wouldn’t survive five minutes if its life depended on the tastes and desires of Canadians themselves. We will finally face basic common sense: culture cannot be created artificially by tax payers’ money, and if there is not enough interest in a country to naturally keep a television or radio station afloat, than that country does not need a television or radio station.

The victory of globalization means the end of Canadian socialism. And the end of Canadian socialism means the end of Canada, because this nation is an artificial structure that is kept intact by nationalist and socialist elites who exploit their own citizens for the sake of keeping themselves in power. It’s time for the unrestrained forces of capitalism to prevail, so that we can finally abandon our pathetic fantasy of having a unique culture, let alone a unique anything. It’s time to become who we always were: Americans. Long live globalization


TOPICS: Canada; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: canuckistan; globalization; jamieglazov
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-172 next last
To: taxesareforever
And also, where would our deserters go to?

Quebec or Newfoundland

61 posted on 05/09/2004 6:56:06 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Tagline under development... check back later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: 230FMJ
I have similar feelings in Maine,...

Come to think of it, I'd rather give Maine & all the rest of New England to Canada. A good fit, don't you think?

62 posted on 05/09/2004 6:56:58 PM PDT by Republic If You Can Keep It (John Kerry once dreamed he was giving a speech. Then he woke up......and he was!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SaveTheChief
The Day After Tomorrow. I was on a thread about this a few days ago and got ridiculed for saying the trailers looked good. If the movie is an environmentalist screed, it should flop.

"If you want to send a message, use Western Union." -Louis B. Meyer

63 posted on 05/09/2004 6:57:28 PM PDT by O.C. - Old Cracker (When the cracker gets old, you wind up with Old Cracker. - O.C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS; Eaker; humblegunner; TexasCowboy
We will absorb Canada and Mexico will absorb ........ and Texas.

Well they tried that once before.

64 posted on 05/09/2004 6:58:32 PM PDT by HoustonCurmudgeon (RIP U. S. Army Specialist Pat Tillman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
What if we don't want them?

Who needs more dumbed down socialists looking to cannibalize any success we have with capitalism?
65 posted on 05/09/2004 6:59:07 PM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
Bump
To read later
66 posted on 05/09/2004 6:59:45 PM PDT by Fiddlstix (This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
I was thinking of allowing Canada to come in as two states. East Canada and West Canada. That way we only have to add two stars to our flag. The western provinces will combine to one "super-state" and will likely send conservatives to Congress (in spite of Vancouver). The eastern provinces (sans Quebec which I have no hope for) will for their own "super-state" and will likely lean liberal so the whole thing will be a wash politically.

Quebec will be isolated and surrounded by the US. Those Frenchies will sure have their panties in a twist - too bad. Next time they boo our national anthem in their scuzzy hockey rink, we'll just kick them (Montreal) out of the NHL and we won't have to worry about playing "O Canada" in our rinks anymore because there will only be American teams left.

Obviously upper Canada will remain territories as they are pretty much unpopulated.

This would make the United States the largest country (in area) in the world and we would have access to additional natural resources that are incalculable.

Not a bad deal in that context.

67 posted on 05/09/2004 7:01:01 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (I don't own this gas-guzzling SUV - my wife does!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: JoeSchem
When half the population of Texas speaks spanish as their first language, are you going to start shooting people? I didn't think so.

When they try, again, to make us part of Mexico we will. BTW most of the people I know under 30 with Spanish sir names don't speak Spanish very well.

68 posted on 05/09/2004 7:01:12 PM PDT by HoustonCurmudgeon (RIP U. S. Army Specialist Pat Tillman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: teletech
I feel the same way about Mexico and all the bilingual signs that are being put up EVERYWHERE in the U.S.
69 posted on 05/09/2004 7:02:04 PM PDT by proudofthesouth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: O.C. - Old Cracker
This is an idea for a book I'm writing. What do you think?

You'll get "thunderous" applause and misty-eyed adulation from the 5 last-remaining members of the John Birch Society, maybe, but I understand they still regularly feel the need to purge their ranks of "conspirators." You'll line up at most a total of about 3 pre-ordered copies.

70 posted on 05/09/2004 7:02:37 PM PDT by Agamemnon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Ciexyz
Actually that's four languages. English, Spanish, French and Canadian.
71 posted on 05/09/2004 7:02:42 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (I don't own this gas-guzzling SUV - my wife does!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Republic If You Can Keep It
One possibility would be to combine the New England states, New Jersey, and downstate New York with the four Maritime Provinces as a separate country.
72 posted on 05/09/2004 7:05:26 PM PDT by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS
We will absorb Canada and Mexico will absorb California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas.

No, we will absorb Mexico too. (As soon as the government realizes that Americans would invest in Mexico if US laws prevailed.)

73 posted on 05/09/2004 7:06:55 PM PDT by KC_for_Freedom (Sailing the highways of America, and loving it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
What do we *want* Canada for? Thirty million new voters (i.e. about 50 new US congressmen) that are stark screaming liberal? No thanks.
74 posted on 05/09/2004 7:10:10 PM PDT by valkyrieanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
What? Like we need 20,000,000 more welfare recipients.
75 posted on 05/09/2004 7:10:52 PM PDT by LoneRangerMassachusetts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HoustonCurmudgeon
However, in those days we had in the Army "Old Fuss and Feathers;" "Bobby' Edward Lee; U.S. 'Sam' Grant;"Old Rough and Ready;" James Longstreet etc. The President was James Polk a man way above average for Presidents. A Congress with Webster and Calhoun etc.

Today! Hillary and Bill; Kerry, Teddy Kennedy. The list can go on and on and on. Such a list will set forth all the human vices. If one looks carefully each individual will exemplify a particular one of the seven deadly sins i.e. Kennedy=drunkeness; Bill=lust and so forth. The country pays a price for this type of indulgence.

76 posted on 05/09/2004 7:11:51 PM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (Further, the statement assumed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: O.C. - Old Cracker
The Day After Tomorrow. This is the one.

The trailers look like the movie will be packed with some good special effects and action sequences.

On the other hand, the audience will be bombarded with enviro-wacko themes and guilt for causing the castistrophic end of life on earth within the next decade or two. Check out the website.

The bottom line is one has to either have a strong stomach, or really believe in this stuff to get through the movie. (or so I assume)

Total junk-science goron crapola.

77 posted on 05/09/2004 7:13:12 PM PDT by SaveTheChief (The most crooked, you know, lying...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: proudofthesouth
I feel the same way about Mexico and all the bilingual signs that are being put up EVERYWHERE in the U.S.

Me too!

78 posted on 05/09/2004 7:26:03 PM PDT by teletech (Friends don't let friends vote DemocRAT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
This would make the United States the largest country (in area) in the world and we would have access to additional natural resources that are incalculable. Not a bad deal in that context.

I like the idea of Canada becoming a part of the US (without Quebec, of course). To make it happen, I think there would have to be a super majority on both sides of the border to vote on it and to make it happen.

In the US the vote would be like a blend of a popular vote and Constitutional amendment: 3/4 of the 50 current United States' legislatures would have to approve, and 3/4 of the voting population of the US would have to vote in favor. Same thing on the Canadian side of the border.

Get 3/4 agreement from those who join (Canadians) and 3/4 agreement on them joining the US (as voiced by US citizenry and govt), and you will have the national purpose established and philosophical cohesion necessary to make the concept work.

After that we could work on the UK to pull out of the EU and form a North Atlantic Free Trade Zone.

79 posted on 05/09/2004 7:26:23 PM PDT by Agamemnon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: SaveTheChief; HoustonCurmudgeon; "Tony" Aguilar; 13th warrior; 1L; 1riot1ranger; 2bfree; ...
Mexico will absorb Texas when and ONLY when they can pry my gun from my cold dead hands.

I agree, but I believe that our local, city, state and feral gov has sold us out.

They may win, but they have a bunch of prying to do first.

Safe Chief.

I used the "Really Big Texas Ping List" on this. Let me know if you want off.

80 posted on 05/09/2004 7:26:32 PM PDT by Eaker (That the bright star of Texas shall never be dim while her soil boasts a son to raise rifle or limb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-172 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson