Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The looming oil crisis will dwarf 1973. Commentary: Forces converge to create worldwide woes
CBS.MarketWatch.com ^ | Last Update: 8:02 PM ET May 5, 2004 | By Paul Erdman

Posted on 05/06/2004 9:00:54 AM PDT by .cnI redruM

HEALDSBURG, Calif. (CBS.MW) -- As the price of crude oil keeps rising toward $40 a barrel and beyond, it has become increasingly clear that the world is heading toward a major oil crisis -- in terms of both price and supply -- that will dwarf that of 1973.

There can be no doubt that the fall of the House of Saud would be thrust the entire Western world into an energy crisis of unprecedented proportions.

For many of us who have been observers of global energy trends for what now amounts to decades, this has become not a matter of "if" but rather one of "when." We are facing a convergence of three forces that will have a potentially explosive effect on the market for crude oil.

They are:

1. A growing geopolitical crisis in the Middle East, which is now threatening to spread beyond Iraq to Saudi Arabia, the world's largest producer and exporter of crude oil.

2. A surge in global demand for energy and particularly crude oil and its derivatives, fueled by the recovery of both the American and Japanese economies and the unprecedented growth of China, which has just replaced Japan as the world's second largest consumer of crude oil.

3. A structural deterioration of the world's oil supply. What is involved here is nothing short of an imminent peaking out of production of crude oil on a global basis -- known by energy industry insiders as "Hubbert's Peak" -- which would turn a cyclical supply/demand crisis into a structural energy crisis of unprecedented proportions.

This is the first a series of articles dealing with this pending crisis and its potential impact on our economy and financial markets

Where the role of geopolitical events on the price and supply of crude oil is concerned, the early warning signals of a major crisis are now coming in every week. In late April it came in the form of a terrorist attack on the Persian Gulf oil terminal through which 90 percent of Iraq's crude oil exports flow. The attack forced the temporary shutdown of the facility. This event merely adds to the mounting evidence that those who have been trying to convince us that Iraq will soon reassume its role is a major supplier of oil to the world market -- as much as 3.5 million barrels a day this year, and 5 million barrels per day within five years -- have been leading us down the garden path.

As a result of the disastrous security situation prevailing in Iraq, all attempts at restoring the output potential of its oil field have now been put on an indefinite hold. Even the first $20 billion dollars of funding originally committed to needed repairs of the facilities there has been cancelled. The sad truth is that in the foreseeable future Iraq will supply less crude oil to the world market than it did before the war.

But compared to what could happen inside its neighbor to the south, all this barely deserves a footnote. The first indications that the supply of oil from the entire Mideast may be on the edge of implosion are now beginning to take on concrete and unmistakable form.

I refer here to the massacre of five employees of the Swiss-based ABB who had been contracted out to run a petrochemical a joint venture of Exxon Mobil and Saudi Basic Industries Corp in Saudi Arabia. It was an inside job. Their killers were Saudi nationals who worked there. This prompted the US ambassador to Saudi Arabia to urge all US nationals -- numbering in the tens of thousands -- to leave the country immediately, because neither the kingdom nor the United States can guarantee their security. This represents a retreat by the United States of historical proportions.

Since World War II, our country has essentially acted as a protectorate of the rulers of Saudi Arabia, the House of Saud, in return for that nation's commitment to act as the great stabilizer of both the supply and price of crude oil in the global market for this key commodity. Saudi Arabia is uniquely able to play such a role, since it is universally recognized as the world's key "swing" producer of crude oil. On average its output of 8 million barrels a day accounts for 10 percent of the world's supply of crude petroleum, almost all of which is exported. But what is perhaps even more significant, Saudi Arabia is in a position to increase output and exports to 11 million barrels a day almost overnight should a supply crisis occur elsewhere in the world.

Were, however, the rulers of this supplier of last resort be brought down by the revolutionary forces of the Islamic Fascists whose numbers seem to be increasing geometrically inside Saudi Arabia, their first step as the nation's new rulers would be to suspend all oil exports, demonstrating for all to see the ultimate power which Islam wields over the West.

For there can be no doubt whatsoever that the fall of the House of Saud would be thrust the entire Western world into an energy crisis of unprecedented proportions. Lest there be any doubt about this, as Larry Goldstein, president of the Petroleum Industry Research Foundation told the Wall Street Journal this week: A disruption of Saudi oil supplies is "one event to which no one has an answer."

As will be described in the next article in this series, such a supply crisis could hardly come at a worse time. The world's dependence on oil is spiking with the revival of economic growth in the U.S. and Japan, and the emergence of China as a major competitor for the limited supply of petroleum, even as all attempts to introduce energy conservation on a major scale have been essentially abandoned.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: drillanwarnow; energy; energyprices; oil; saudiarabia; scaremongering
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-137 next last
To: .cnI redruM
For what it's worth, the grand multiplication of SUVs, which resulted in part because Federal regulations excuse "trucks" from the fuel constraints, was mostly the responsibility of clinton and gore. There were very few SUVs before 1992. Everyone was driving minivans.

On the other side, it's the Democrats who have blocked the passage of any kind of meaningful energy plan, under the pretence of protecting the environment. Alaska oil is the most obvious point, but there are several others.

The biggest contribution to cutting back oil consumption would be to cut back regulation of electric power plants and in particular to start building new, clean nuclear plants. That would save huge amounts at limited economic cost, as opposed to such fringe ideas as windmills and solar power cells, which would add tiny amounts at huge cost.

France gets 70% of its electrical power from nuclear plants. Japan does well too. It can be done.

But it will never happen as long as you have an evil coalition of Democrats, environmentalist whackos, and tort lawyers working together to prevent it.
21 posted on 05/06/2004 9:29:20 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
I think you left out the paragraphs about the Rapture and the Antichrist.

22 posted on 05/06/2004 9:29:21 AM PDT by megatherium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Bob
You forgot all about the Tri-Lateral Commission hidden under the Arctic Ice Cap (Oops, wrong thread...)
23 posted on 05/06/2004 9:29:42 AM PDT by .cnI redruM (The words "nose candy" and the name Ted Rall belong in the same sentence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Initiative
My 4,300-pound SUV is supposed to average 15-18 mpg. If I drive it on the highway at 70 mph, I can get as high as 22 mpg.
24 posted on 05/06/2004 9:30:14 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Ego numquam pronunciare mendacium . . . sed ego sum homo indomitus" -- William Wallace (Mel Gibson))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
You missed a critical point. What do we do about more refining capacity?? Every refinery we have is running at full capacity. So if we drill all of your proposed wells and find all of this oil, what do we do about turning in into gasoline??
25 posted on 05/06/2004 9:35:50 AM PDT by BooBoo1000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Brang it on
The quicker we get rid of the sand turds the better
JMHO
26 posted on 05/06/2004 9:36:27 AM PDT by DeaconRed (sKerry did a flip flop, stepped on a pop top, got a purple heart, then threw it away. Or did he?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Drill ANWAR like a $10 hooker

LOL! Funniest thing I've read all week!

27 posted on 05/06/2004 9:36:32 AM PDT by FierceDraka (The English word "Left" is translated into Latin as "Sinister". Think about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Bob
And don't forget about killer asteroids!
28 posted on 05/06/2004 9:37:06 AM PDT by FierceDraka (The English word "Left" is translated into Latin as "Sinister". Think about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
OPEC would whine like a Greenpeace Demonstrator at a spotted-owl shoot.

btw- When is the next spotted owl shoot?

I forgot to sign up for the mailing list at the last one.

29 posted on 05/06/2004 9:38:14 AM PDT by norraad ("What light!">Blues Brothers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RonF
Coal gasification/liquification is a real option. West Virginia could certainly use the demand.
Gasoline from coal is in high output in South Africa - a plant on the same design basis was built and I believe still in operation in North Dakota.
Canadian syncrude operations continue to grow.
The key has always been return on investment. Prices are now at a level where coal gasification can be justified.
Just announce a gasification proposal and watch OPEC bring down prices as they did in the 80's.
30 posted on 05/06/2004 9:38:31 AM PDT by medlaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
In the Carter years, when the Islamofacist took over Iran, the inflation rate was over 20%. Hunt tried to comer the world market in sliver and a pre 64 silver coin could be sold at 20 times face and regular gas was 2.00 a gallon. You do the math to convert 1972 dollars to today's dollars. Like the first World Trade Center bombing we essentially ignored this preview of coming events. Today we(and the western world) are at the mercy of the sand people. A fact that has not escaped them.

Fat, dumb, and happy, the US has resumed its energy guzzling ways. The libs also understand that the only thing that will cause a major upheaval in the country is a energy crisis, and have moved to block every effort to ease the dependences on oil imports.

History tell us that countries can remain stable in famine, wars, plague, but cannot survive rampant inflation. When the ME shuts off the oil tap inflation will go through the roof and the Hunts of the world will try to corner the basic materials markets.

31 posted on 05/06/2004 9:39:13 AM PDT by TUX (Domino effect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Bob
Oh goody. Retro-angst.
32 posted on 05/06/2004 9:39:28 AM PDT by MARTIAL MONK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Electricity isn't our problem right now. Petroleum is. Not much petroleum is used outside the transportation sector; the transportation sector is heavily dependent on petroleum. Electricity (coal, nuclear) can't readily substitute for petroleum, for automobiles. Eventually, we'll switch to nuclear/hydrogen but that can't happen in time to forstall an oil crisis.

The car companies made a stab at battery-powered cars (e.g., the GM EV-1) but determined the demand for cars with less than 100 miles range on a charge wouldn't be there. We have to settle for hybrids for the time being.

I recommend the book Hubbert's Peak: the Coming World Oil Crisis, by Kenneth Deffeyes (Princeton University Press). You might not buy his argument that we're in deep trouble, but it is an entertainly written explanation as to how the oil industry works and how petroleum is found and developed.
33 posted on 05/06/2004 9:39:47 AM PDT by megatherium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Were, however, the rulers of this supplier of last resort be brought down by the revolutionary forces of the Islamic Fascists whose numbers seem to be increasing geometrically inside Saudi Arabia, their first step as the nation's new rulers would be to suspend all oil exports, demonstrating for all to see the ultimate power which Islam wields over the West.

If these "Islamic Fascists" were to suspend all oil exports, they would lose the only real source of revenue their nation has. I don't know anyone with an IQ over 30 who thinks this would be an effective career move.

Refusing to export your only commodity on ideological grounds is about as effective as jumping off a bridge to protest the terrible impact that gravity has on us.

34 posted on 05/06/2004 9:41:08 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Ego numquam pronunciare mendacium . . . sed ego sum homo indomitus" -- William Wallace (Mel Gibson))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
[ D) Drill ANWAR like a $10 hooker. ]

ANWAR is a tiny place in Alaska.. Most of Northern Alaska is dripping with oil, not only ANWAR. Actually theres oil in Alaska that nobody knows of yet. Its on federal lands which are off limits. Not to speak of the natural gas and almost an entire state of untapped COAL veins everywhere. Coal washes up at many beaches and is used for campfires.

And Alaska is almost as big as the western United States, far bigger than Texas. A huge untapped reservoir of energy. UNTAPPED.?.. Compared to whats there,, YES..

35 posted on 05/06/2004 9:41:27 AM PDT by hosepipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck
Emulate Bunker Hunt today!!
36 posted on 05/06/2004 9:44:36 AM PDT by .cnI redruM (The words "nose candy" and the name Ted Rall belong in the same sentence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Bob
Let's See..




You forgot:

37 posted on 05/06/2004 9:46:16 AM PDT by fr_freak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Initiative
"Within 20 years, we'll have Hydrogen cars running around."

Personally, I don't think they will be mainstream even in 20 years - more likely hybrids of some sort. Hydrogen creates as many problems as it solves, it's just the fad to say hydrogen sill solve everything.
38 posted on 05/06/2004 9:46:24 AM PDT by FastCoyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe
Compared to whats there,, YES!

It's only the second most plentiful liquid on earth!

39 posted on 05/06/2004 9:46:27 AM PDT by norraad ("What light!">Blues Brothers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: TUX
Today we(and the western world) are at the mercy of the sand people.

Baloney. Do some research on the annual figures posted by the U.S. Department of Energy, and you'll be surprised at how little oil the U.S. gets from Saudi Arabia. One of the most enduring trends in this area over the last 30 years has been a shift in U.S. oil imports away from the Middle East and toward Western Hemisphere producers like Venezuela, Canada and Mexico and toward non-OPEC producers in Africa like Nigeria.

The only reliance we have on the "sand people" is from a pricing perspective. The U.S. "relies" on foreign oil for the same reason we "rely" on bananas from South America, manufactured goods from China, and landscapers from Mexico -- because these are the cheapest sources of these things.

40 posted on 05/06/2004 9:46:42 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Ego numquam pronunciare mendacium . . . sed ego sum homo indomitus" -- William Wallace (Mel Gibson))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-137 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson