Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ten years later, Paula Jones has modest place in history
Associated Press | May 2, 2004 | JAMES JEFFERSON

Posted on 05/02/2004 8:04:54 AM PDT by HAL9000

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. — Paula Jones' sexual harassment lawsuit, filed 10 years ago this week alleging Bill Clinton made an indecent proposal to her, sparked a sex probe that threatened to topple Clinton's presidency.

Jones sued Clinton in federal court May 6, 1994, alleging that he exposed himself and propositioned her three years earlier, when she was a state worker and he was governor, at what is now the Peabody Hotel in downtown Little Rock, a few blocks from where a $160 million library complex is being built to enshrine the former president's legacy.

Clinton denied the allegations.

Jones' claims forced one of the biggest sex scandals of the 20th century and eventually led to the first presidential impeachment in 168 years.

Jones declined repeated requests to comment for this article. A spokeswoman for Clinton said he had no comment.

In a 2000 appearance on CNN's "Larry King Live," Jones said she was never out to hurt Clinton, but to prove that her allegations against him were true "because it did hurt me."

"I don't regret it," she said at the time. "It has opened up ... something big for women in the workplace, about sexual harassment, so I don't have any regrets about it."

The consequences of her lawsuit — the Monica Lewinsky scandal, Clinton's impeachment, "that's Bill Clinton's problem," she said.

One historian says Jones' role in the historic events has been reduced to that of bit player.

"She was an important actor early on, but in the second and third acts, she was replaced by Monica Lewinsky," said Leo Riuffo, history professor at George Washington University.

A lawyer who represented Jones through much of her lawsuit against Clinton said Jones helped reinforce the defining legal principle of the American justice system, winning a U.S. Supreme Court decision that she could pursue her civil suit while Clinton was still in office.

"What the unanimous Supreme Court decision has underscored is that we are all equal before the bar of justice, Washington lawyer Joseph Cammarata said. "You have a woman, a mother, who sues a sitting president and the Supreme Court says that she's just as important as the president of the United States as far as her access to justice."

Clinton's lawyer in the Jones case, Washington lawyer Robert Bennett, said the Supreme Court decision could cause future peril for the nation.

"Their decision in that case has put into jeopardy every sitting U.S. president," Bennett said. "They can be brought into litigation matters and can be distracted from their job of protecting the country. We were very fortunate that we had a president who had the ability to stick to the job."

It was Clinton's sexual improprieties in the Oval Office with Lewinsky, then a White House intern, and the admittedly evasive and misleading testimony about the affair that he gave under oath in Jones' lawsuit, that led to his impeachment on perjury and obstruction of justice charges.

A Senate trial that began in January 1999 left Clinton absolved but his presidency tainted.

A year earlier, Clinton had testified in the Jones lawsuit and denied having a sexual relationship with Lewinsky. He did so publicly days later, declaring, "I did not have sexual relations with that woman. ... I never told anybody to lie."

But on Aug. 17, after undergoing more than four hours of questioning before a grand jury, Clinton admitted in a humiliating televised speech to the nation, "I did have a relationship with Ms. Lewinsky that was not appropriate."

In between, a federal judge threw out Jones' lawsuit. While the decision was on appeal, and as the sex scandal fueled political consequences, Clinton agreed to an $850,000 settlement with Jones that included no apology or admission of guilt.

The settlement came just over a month before the House approved impeachment articles charging him with perjury and obstruction of justice.

The Senate impeachment trial began Jan. 7, 1999, and the Senate voted to acquit the president Feb. 12. Clinton told the nation he was "profoundly" sorry for his actions.

"The president brought it all upon himself," Cammarata said last week.

"It was well known what our approach was going to be," seeking evidence of other instances of sexual misconduct by Clinton," he said, "and yet he undertakes to have a relationship with Monica Lewinsky in the White House. I don't know what he was thinking.

"He put himself in a position to lie, lie lie. It just caught up with him."

In the summer of 2000, the Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct began disbarment proceedings against Clinton in Arkansas. Clinton struck a deal with Whitewater prosecutors just before leaving office to avoid indictment. As part of the deal, he accepted a five-year suspension of his law license and a $25,000 fine.

Meanwhile, Jones, now, 37, had fallen on tough times.

She said later that attorneys fees swallowed up most of the money from her settlement with Clinton. She and her husband of eight years, Steven Jones, divorced in 1999 and Jones moved from California back to Cabot, Ark., her hometown, with their two sons.

Within months, she posed nude for Penthouse magazine, telling interviewers that she went back on a vow not to pose for men's magazines to secure her children's future and pay back taxes she owed.

She married a neighbor, construction equipment company worker Steven Mark McFadden, in October 2001. Sixteen months later, she was pummeled by banished figure-skater Tonya Harding in a Fox TV special, "Celebrity Boxing."

She now lives in a quiet, upscale subdivision in Cabot, a bedroom community about 25 miles northeast of Little Rock.

Since leaving office, Clinton has traveled the world and makes speeches for as much as $100,000 an appearance. The former president is completing his memoirs, for which he was reportedly paid $10 million to $12 million.

His presidential library complex is scheduled to open on Little Rock's riverfront in November.

Designer Ralph Applebaum of New York said last year that impeachment would get the same treatment at the library as the other major themes of Clinton's presidency.

Skip Rutherford, head of the foundation that is building the library, said no decision has been made on how the Jones factor will play there.



TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clinton; impeachedx42; paulajones
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
If Paula Jones had not filed that lawsuit, Al Gore would be president today. Thanks Paula!
1 posted on 05/02/2004 8:04:55 AM PDT by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
sparked a sex probe...

Is that anything like lighting a cigar?
2 posted on 05/02/2004 8:08:47 AM PDT by anonymous_user (Telling the truth means you never have to change your story.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
"Paula Jones' sexual harassment lawsuit, filed 10 years ago this week alleging Bill Clinton made an indecent proposal to her"

If I was being objective and non-political, I would have to ask why she should receive any money because someone made an "indecent proposal" to her. The correct response is to slap him across the face and walk away.

We conservatives have always rightly opposed the sexual harassment witch hunt and we oppose frivolous lawsuits. There isn't much to admire about this case.

3 posted on 05/02/2004 8:12:50 AM PDT by Batrachian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
We were very fortunate that we had a president who had the ability to stick to the job."

I can't even begin to comment on the stupidity of this quote.

Clinton would have gotten away whith the whole scandal if he didn't "stick" to the blue dress.

4 posted on 05/02/2004 8:15:54 AM PDT by John Thornton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
To me, the most troubling part of the Paula Jones crime was the silence of the other women who Willie must have molested between raping the girl at Oxford (and, being expelled for it) and Jones. That's a period of about 20 years (1963-1983?). The most freightening fact suggested by the silence is the brutal, vicious effectiveness of his clean up machine.

How many women now living within commuting distance of the Library of Shame could have come forward with key testimony but were too terrifired?

5 posted on 05/02/2004 8:16:35 AM PDT by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
If Paul Jones had not filed this lawsuit, we would have never had know how bad a boxer she is.
6 posted on 05/02/2004 8:18:21 AM PDT by Bluntpoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Batrachian
***If I was being objective and non-political, I would have to ask why she should receive any money because someone made an "indecent proposal" to her. The correct response is to slap him across the face and walk away.***

You try slapping a governor in the face, and find out how many attorneys' fees you'd have to pay to defend yourself against aggravated assault against a governor.

Try slapping a governor in the face and see how long it takes for you to lose your job.

7 posted on 05/02/2004 8:19:43 AM PDT by kitkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tacis
I have not heard about the Oxford thing. What're the details on that?

Once a rapist, always a rapist, eh?
8 posted on 05/02/2004 8:20:45 AM PDT by GnuHere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Batrachian
The primary legal principal created by the case is the "Slick Willie One Free Flash Rule." The US District Court held as a matter of law that you can expose yourself to a subordinatae employee and ask her to give you oral sex. If she says no and you don't push the issue, then you cannot be sued for sexual harrassment.

Isn't it amazing that he still has unquestioning support from NOW and the other feminist groups.

9 posted on 05/02/2004 8:23:44 AM PDT by Bubba_Leroy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Batrachian
"If I was being objective and non-political, I would have to ask why she should receive any money because someone made an "indecent proposal" to her."

He did more than just make an indecent proposal to her. If you will recall, he said he was a good buddy with her boss, putting pressure on her by implying that if she put out, she would be rewarded at word and conversely, if she failed to put out, she would suffer repercussions at work.

No one should have to put up with that sort of crap.
10 posted on 05/02/2004 8:24:28 AM PDT by jjackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
"Their decision in that case has put into jeopardy every sitting U.S. president," Bennett said. "They can be brought into litigation matters and can be distracted from their job of protecting the country. We were very fortunate that we had a president who had the ability to stick to the job."

No president is in jeopardy who conducts himself with the dignity due the office of the president...Clinton stuck (it) to the job alright.

A Senate trial that began in January 1999 left Clinton absolved but his presidency tainted.

Tainted? Tainted?...more like totally putrefied and corrupted!

11 posted on 05/02/2004 8:24:52 AM PDT by ride the whirlwind (We can't let Kerry win - an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GnuHere
"I have not heard about the Oxford thing. What're the details on that? "

This is where it broke...

12 posted on 05/02/2004 8:26:33 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack ("We deal in hard calibers and hot lead." - Roland Deschaines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ride the whirlwind
Paula Jones will never be the same!

Today the poor girl is unrecognizable.

Witness:

Before:

After:


13 posted on 05/02/2004 8:29:12 AM PDT by Bluntpoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Batrachian
Clinton committed an illegality and lied about it under oath. Jones was a victim, she's entitled to any form of compensation.
14 posted on 05/02/2004 8:29:23 AM PDT by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bluntpoint
yeah, but she loooked good in those shorts!
15 posted on 05/02/2004 8:30:51 AM PDT by Mr. K (ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,I stole this cuz its funny,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
You can say that without being sued.

What you can't say is she would look good in your shorts.
16 posted on 05/02/2004 8:33:30 AM PDT by Bluntpoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Bluntpoint
Blech.
17 posted on 05/02/2004 8:37:39 AM PDT by Tax-chick (I was swimming with dolphins whispering imaginary numbers in the fourth dimension.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
"Their decision in that case has put into jeopardy every sitting U.S. president," Bennett said.

No, but it might keep the riff-raff out... Shucks, it didn't work, Kerry's running.

18 posted on 05/02/2004 8:39:24 AM PDT by evolved_rage (Where they take an arm and a leg.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
Jones sued Clinton in federal court May 6, 1994, alleging that he exposed himself and propositioned her three years earlier, when she was a state worker and he was governor, at what is now the Peabody Hotel in downtown Little Rock, a few blocks from where a $160 million library complex is being built to enshrine the former president's legacy.

Another El Slicko story in the news today. Talk about a legacy for slicko, just grab a handful of cigars, a few porno mags and a failed attempt to stop terrorism.

19 posted on 05/02/2004 8:46:31 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (A vote for kerry or any other RAT, is a vote for the terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Fails to mention the Am Spectator story that drove her to go public.
20 posted on 05/02/2004 8:47:57 AM PDT by 11x62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson