Posted on 04/29/2004 8:36:24 PM PDT by Carl/NewsMax
MSNBC TRANSCRIPT
Scarborough Country
April 28, 2004
JOE SCARBOROUGH: Today, the senator‘s office tried to strong-arm us into retracting that story. . . .
Last night, we showed you comments made by Hillary Clinton that criticized George Bush and America‘s foreign policy in the Middle East. Her complaints run by Arab newspapers and repeated across the Middle East. She said this—quote—
“Their stubbornness and arrogance is breathtaking. And, as a result, we continue to go down a path that I think is fraught with horrible dangers, especially for the young men and women serving in Iraq, but also for Iraqis, for the stability of the region.”. . .
Early this morning, Ms. Clinton‘s office began calling our staff and the president of MSNBC, claiming the statements we reported last night were never made by the senator. . . .
This morning at about 10:00 a.m., we got an angry phone call from Senator Clinton‘s office. They were demanding an apology and a retraction. They said she never spoke to the Arab press. She never criticized the president, and, in fact, never did the interview at all.
Our producers immediately double-checked our sources and we tracked down the reporter who did the interview with Senator Clinton, and by noon we found out that the interview did take place. And the senator‘s press secretary then started to back down.
And by 4:30 this afternoon, the senator‘s representatives admitted that she did the interview. She did know the reporter was writing to an international audience, and she did criticize the president.
(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...
They probably sent out the hounds to track down the scent of old crusty, still lingering on the reporter who interviewed Hitlery .
When all else looks grim for those without character they count on invoking sympathy by honoring those with character...weird huh?
"HILLARY CLINTON IS AN OUTRAGE. HER WORDS AND ACTIONS PUT OUR SERVICE MEN AT INCREASED RISK!"
http://www.tehrantimes.com/Description.asp?Da=4/27/2004&Cat=4&Num=011
'Viewerservices@foxnews.com'; 'FOXaroundtheworld@foxnews.com'; 'Comments@foxnews.com'; 'Foxnewsonline@foxnews.com'; 'atlarge@foxnews.com'; 'cavuto@foxnews.com'; 'dayside@foxnews.com'; 'forbes@foxnews.com'; 'friends@foxnews.com'; 'foxmagazine@foxnews.com'; 'fns@foxnews.com'; 'newswatch@foxnews.com'; 'foxreport@foxnews.com'; 'hannity@foxnews.com'; 'colmes@foxnews.com'; 'heartland@foxnews.com'; 'ontherecord@foxnews.com'; 'special@foxnews.com'; 'studiob@foxnews.com'; 'beltway@foxnews.com'; 'myword@foxnews.com'; 'orielly@foxnews.com'; 'Warstories@foxnews.com'; 'MTP@NBC.com'; 'viewerservices@msnbc.com'; 'Dateline@NBC.com'; 'Nightly@NBC.com'; 'weekendtoday@nbc.com'; 'Today@NBC.com'; 'Imus@msnbc.com'; 'buchananandpress@msnbc.com'; 'hardball@msnbc.com'; 'countdown@msnbc.com'; 'abramsreport@msnbc.com'; 'joe@msnbc.com'; 'voices@msnbc.com'; 'msnbcinvestigates@msnbc.com'
1) Bill & Hillary BOTH want back in the White House and limelight, they HATE not being the most important people on the planet.
2) They see President Bush as vulnerable to the same campaign they ran against his father.
3) They've perfected the Lautenberg/Torricelli checkerboard jump move.
4) NY was a test for their vote fraud machine. Did you notice the fraud in NY worked and she won, while Gore's team in Florida blew it? The new computer program voting machines will be a ripe orchard of untraceable, fraudulent votes for her.
5) You mentioned the 50-50 split electorate with very few "indies." This works for the Clintons. Hillary gets every vote Al Gore got, PLUS picks up a few "indie" women as the first female President.
6) Liberal media. The honeymoon will last all the way until election day. Hillary will not be questioned, just praised. There will be no debates - she'll claim "..the debate is taking place in front of the American people every day." BS. She will dominate the media until election day, sucking all the oxygen out of the campaign atomosphere.
If the Clintons believe she can win, she's running. The Clintons believe she can win, and if the above plays out, she will. Be afraid, be VERY afraid.
They had to...or Joe would have a job at Fox...
This is what you call a two'fer...
Joe got it out, and put his management into a position that they didn't like at all...
GO JOE
/sarcasm
Add this to ABC's Charlie Gubson giving John eFing Kerry flak over his lies about throwing away his medals 30 some odd years ago and I say
Holy Shinola!!!!!
Has Hell Froze Over?????
My dog didn't bite the plaintiff.
My dog doesn't bite anyone.
In fact, I don't even have a dog.
Yes to your #1.
No,in spades to your #2! This President Bush is NOT his father,a duplicate of that campaign would NOT work,and he is NOT all that "vulnerable". Besides which,no one,outside of Ark. really knew much,if anything about Bill,in '92;but they sure do now.
No,again to your #3.A national election isn't Jersey!
Bill can no longer give pardons away,which is part of how Hill won in N.Y.;not to mention the fact that they no longer "own" the DNC lock,stock,and barrel. Oh yes, and then there is the WAR CHEST...Kerry doesn't have to hand THAT over to Hillary and she does NOT have the money it would take for the run.
Wrong,yet again,with your #5.Naderites and Deaniacs and those in the Kesnnedy/Kerry camp would NOT be "happy little campers" and as much as they all HATE the president,many would NOT automatically roll over and play dead and vote for the usurper Hill.Then, as I have mentioned earlier,the Conservative fringers,who pathologically hate the Clintons more than they HATE Bush and everything GOP, who WILL vote GOP,to spite the Clintons.
Your #6 is 1/2 right and 1/2 dead wrong.The media,without a doubt,would not only gives her carte blanche,but FREE cheer-leading.OTOH,there most certainly WOULD be debates.You're delusional,if you imagine that there would be none,with Hillary claiming that none were needed.The media would NEVER stand for no debates;not even the conglomerate ABCNBCCBSCNNMSNBC!
The Clintons believe that she can win ...this year? Says WHO,besides you? And when was the last time the Clintons allowed YOU to sit in on their planning sessions?Your crystal ball is cracked...just like your silly scenarios!
Look,the WoT will NOT be over come November.Neither will the actions in Afghanistan and Iraq.Hillary does NOT want any part of those things,neither does her husband,and that's only one part of WHY she has NO plans at all to be on the ticket this year.And before you say that she'll just pull our troops out and ignore it all,she does NOT want to be blamed for something far worse than the Nam War was,or more attacks on this soil.
You really do NOT understand how she thinks,nor even how the American populace would react to your delusions,which are based on your own fears and only a little knowledge about this nasty couple.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.