1 posted on
04/27/2004 4:45:04 PM PDT by
upchuck
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: upchuck
![](http://www.snoopygift.com/images/sn-flag-sm.jpg)
Once again, Charlie lays the hammer right on the nail.
2 posted on
04/27/2004 4:46:35 PM PDT by
upchuck
(Message to Senator John F'ing sKerry: Egotism is the anesthetic that dulls the pain of stupidity.)
To: upchuck
These libreals make me sick! War is coming keep pushing it :(
To: upchuck
Do we want someone who sits around second guessing himself or a man who takes all the info at his disposal and leads. Just one "I'm sorry for....." from him and his opponents will crucify him with it. I'm certainly glad he has not bought into this lame blame game.
5 posted on
04/27/2004 4:51:53 PM PDT by
Route66
(America's Mainstreet)
To: upchuck
Krauthammer nails it.
Wartime failures shouldn't be characterized that way. In war - more than in most areas of life - one must act fast on incomplete information. Success is far from guaranteed and continued and unbroken success is miraculous.
But I would like to know why we didn't do more to stop the post-conquest looting. That was extremely damaging to our subsequent efforts.
To: upchuck
I recall a president who made plenty of mistakes and never admitted one. His name was Lincoln.
7 posted on
04/27/2004 4:53:48 PM PDT by
RobbyS
(JMJ)
To: upchuck
Iraq was a country utterly ruined by Saddam Hussein.I think that the bombs that the US dropped had something to do with ruining the county. Don't you?
8 posted on
04/27/2004 4:54:35 PM PDT by
Mike4Freedom
(Freedom is the one thing that you cannot have unless you grant it to everyone else.)
To: upchuck
I don't want Bush to be my daddy, I elected him to lead.
I don't want him to apologize for what my enemies have done, I want him to hunt them down and destroy them.
9 posted on
04/27/2004 4:55:19 PM PDT by
marron
To: upchuck
What was the next morning's Washington Post headline? WOLFOWITZ GIVES NUANCED ASSESSMENT OF IRAQ SITUATION? No. WOLFOWITZ CONCEDES IRAQ ERRORS, followed by a brief for the Administration's critics. What the presstitutes at that news conference wanted was for Bush to make an ad for the Kerry campaign, the most effective one that it could ever have. Bush didn't feel like it and certainly was not obligated to do so.
12 posted on
04/27/2004 4:56:43 PM PDT by
VadeRetro
(Faster than a speeding building! Able to leap tall bullets in a single bound!)
To: upchuck
Bush should have asked the reporters to apologize for their biased war coverage and the dumb questions they keep asking.
14 posted on
04/27/2004 4:58:27 PM PDT by
TheLion
To: upchuck
Clinton had a very clear policy on apologies-he only apologized for things that happened before he was born.
15 posted on
04/27/2004 4:58:36 PM PDT by
Spok
(They call me old Hugh, but I doubt I'm 80.)
To: upchuck
Very good article!
I hope the President doesn't ever apolgize for anything, unless it is for not busting a few media members in the chops!
17 posted on
04/27/2004 5:00:27 PM PDT by
ladyinred
(Kerry has more flip flops than Waikiki Beach)
To: upchuck
Did you know that Clintoon apologized to the Hawaiian for our "occupation"?
Of coarse he never would apologize for anything that happened on his watch. More like "Hey Janet, We need you to due your stooge thing again."
18 posted on
04/27/2004 5:00:58 PM PDT by
lizma
To: upchuck
Why should he say he is sorry?
20 posted on
04/27/2004 5:02:55 PM PDT by
sport
To: upchuck
NO apologies. Bush has nothing to apologize for.
To: upchuck
24 posted on
04/27/2004 5:08:10 PM PDT by
Smartass
(BUSH & CHENEY 2004 - STAMP OUT KERRY'S SOCIALISIM.)
To: upchuck
Why won't Bush say he's sorry? Think of what the response would beHis interrogators at AP, New York Slimes, WSJ, LA Times, and Terry Moran of ABC News, David Gregory of NBC and John Roberts of CBS, etc. would all do a happy dance. Can't have that!
26 posted on
04/27/2004 5:10:59 PM PDT by
ride the whirlwind
(We can't let Kerry win - an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.)
To: upchuck
During his eight years as president, Bill Clinton went around the world apologizing for the United States at the drop of a hat. What did it buy us? Fewer terrorist attacks? More love, respect and cooperation from the "international community?" Or scorn from our enemies?
If anyone other than the jihadists need to apologize, it is our hopelessly Left-skewed media for their betrayal of the American people over and over again.
33 posted on
04/27/2004 5:22:29 PM PDT by
Wolfstar
(Our place in this war? On the political front lines, as our Armed Forces fight on the battle lines.)
To: upchuck
The Trouble With Apologies Why won't Bush say he's sorry? Think of what the response would be
Time is a propaganda rag
34 posted on
04/27/2004 5:23:50 PM PDT by
Vision
(Always Faithful)
To: upchuck
Reporters are not interested in reporting news. Instead they try to make the news & in the process have become a parody of themselves.
To: upchuck; maica; Travis McGee
es, we erred. Perhaps we should not have disbanded the Iraqi army.I thought that the Iraqi army just took off their uniforms and went home. It's tough to disband an army that has disappeared.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson