To: pctech
Guys, you should have gone with John Edwards.I would fear more from Lieberman than Edwards. Edwards is easily and rightly portrayed as a lawyer who made his fortune from "litigation lottery" and would be in the back pocket of the trial lawyers.
4 posted on
04/27/2004 10:15:23 AM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn't be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: Blood of Tyrants
I would fear more from Lieberman than Edwards. I agree. I told my wife before the Dem Primaries that Lieberman would be the toughest to beat, mainly because he would attract many liberal Repubs and conservative Dems. Good thing the Democrat Party is controlled by the far left.
6 posted on
04/27/2004 10:18:44 AM PDT by
ladtx
( "Remember your regiment and follow your officers." Captain Charles May, 2d Dragoons, 9 May 1846)
To: Blood of Tyrants
--agreed. Leiberman was on the tube last night acting positively statesman-like, calling on the politicians to unite behind the war effort, basically---
To: Blood of Tyrants
I'm still thinking there's time for Hillary to sweep in on a shining steed and save the day at the convention.
13 posted on
04/27/2004 10:21:51 AM PDT by
ExSoldier
(When the going gets tough, the tough go cyclic. (R.I.P. harpseal))
To: Blood of Tyrants
I would fear more from Lieberman than Edwards.Really. I'll probably die never having voted for a Democrat, but Lieberman's one of about two Democrats in recent years I could conceivably have voted for.
But only if he switched parties first :-)
18 posted on
04/27/2004 10:25:10 AM PDT by
Right Wing Professor
(Bridge in Brooklyn for sale! First reasonable offer secures this beloved landmark!)
To: Blood of Tyrants
I would fear more from Lieberman than Edwards. Edwards is easily and rightly portrayed as a lawyer who made his fortune from "litigation lottery" and would be in the back pocket of the trial lawyers. However, Lieberman is not the prettiest plate on the shelf. That kind of stuff matters.
To: Blood of Tyrants
I would fear more from Lieberman than Edwards. Edwards is easily and rightly portrayed as a lawyer who made his fortune from "litigation lottery" and would be in the back pocket of the trial lawyers. Yup, that was how he was portrayed in his '98 US Senate race against Lauch Faircloth. Oh wait, Edwards won that . . . (moral=> don't underestimate Edwards and overestimate the gullibility of the American people!)
67 posted on
04/27/2004 12:49:32 PM PDT by
JohnnyZ
(Got some dirt on my shoulder -- could you brush it off for me?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson