Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

When the last oil well runs dry
BBC News Online ^ | Monday, April 19, 2004 | By Alex Kirby

Posted on 04/22/2004 6:22:48 AM PDT by Momaw Nadon

Just as certain as death and taxes is the knowledge that we shall one day be forced to learn to live without oil.

Exactly when that day will dawn nobody knows, but people in middle age today can probably expect to be here for it.

Long before it arrives we shall have had to commit ourselves to one or more of several possible energy futures.

And the momentous decisions we take in the next few years will determine whether our heirs thank or curse us for the energy choices we bequeath to them.


Sunset industry? Oil production could soon peak

Industry's lifeblood

There will always be some oil somewhere, but it may soon cost too much to extract and burn it. It may be too technically difficult, too expensive compared with other fuels, or too polluting.

An article in Scientific American in March 1998 by Dr Colin Campbell and Jean Laherrere concluded: "The world is not running out of oil - at least not yet."

"What our society does face, and soon, is the end of the abundant and cheap oil on which all industrial nations depend."

They suggested there were perhaps 1,000 billion barrels of conventional oil still to be produced, though the US Geological Survey's World Petroleum Assessment 2000 put the figure at about 3,000 billion barrels.

Who holds the world's oil - and how long will it last?

Too good to burn

The world is now producing about 75 million barrels per day (bpd). Conservative (for which read pessimistic) analysts say global oil production from all possible sources, including shale, bitumen and deep-water wells, will peak at around 2015 at about 90 million bpd, allowing a fairly modest increase in consumption.

On Campbell and Laherrere's downbeat estimate, that should last about 30 years at 90 million bpd, so drastic change could be necessary soon after 2030.

And it would be drastic: 90% of the world's transport depends on oil, for a start.

Most of the chemical and plastic trappings of life which we scarcely notice - furniture, pharmaceuticals, communications - need oil as a feedstock.

The real pessimists want us to stop using oil for transport immediately and keep it for irreplaceable purposes like these.

In May 2003 the Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas (ASPO), founded by Colin Campbell, held a workshop on oil depletion in Paris.

Changed priorities

One of the speakers was an investment banker, Matthew Simmons, a former adviser to President Bush's administration.

From The Wilderness Publications reported him as saying: "Any serious analysis now shows solid evidence that the non-FSU [former Soviet Union], non-OPEC [Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries] oil has certainly petered out and has probably peaked...

"I think basically that peaking of oil will never be accurately predicted until after the fact. But the event will occur, and my analysis is... that peaking is at hand, not years away.

"If I'm right, the unforeseen consequences are devastating... If the world's oil supply does peak, the world's issues start to look very different.

"There really aren't any good energy solutions for bridges, to buy some time, from oil and gas to the alternatives. The only alternative right now is to shrink our economies."


No cheap oil, no cheap food

Planning pays off

Aspo suggests the key date is not when the oil runs out, but when production peaks, meaning supplies decline. It believes the peak may come by about 2010.

Fundamental change may be closing on us fast. And even if the oil is there, we may do better to leave it untouched.

Many scientists are arguing for cuts in emissions of the main greenhouse gas we produce, carbon dioxide, by at least 60% by mid-century, to try to avoid runaway climate change.

That would mean burning far less oil than today, not looking for more. There are other forms of energy, and many are falling fast in price and will soon compete with oil on cost, if not for convenience.

So there is every reason to plan for the post-oil age. Does it have to be devastating? Different, yes - but our forebears lived without oil and thought themselves none the worse.

We shall have to do the same, so we might as well make the best of it. And the best might even be an improvement on today.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alternative; alternativepower; cheapoil; cost; demand; dependence; dependent; development; energy; food; import; imports; lightsweetcrude; middleeast; oil; oilage; oilcrash; oildependence; oilreserves; opec; peak; peakoil; petroleum; pollution; postoilage; power; price; prices; production; reliance; renewable; renewableenergy; reserves; saudiarabia; scarce; supply; technology
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-171 next last
FYI and discussion
1 posted on 04/22/2004 6:22:50 AM PDT by Momaw Nadon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
Hogwash, alternative energy sources will reduce the need for oil.
Invest in hog farms!
2 posted on 04/22/2004 6:27:54 AM PDT by #1CTYankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
Methane hydrates will save us, once the energy industry develops a method of harvesting the methane....

Methane Hydrates
3 posted on 04/22/2004 6:31:26 AM PDT by Blzbba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
Yawn... Coal and nukes... why don't we use them more to save on oil? Oh, I forgot, we cant because of windmill huggers.

And by the way, every year new oil deposits are discovered as well as new methods to develop previously unpracticable huge deposits, like the one in Canada that is greater than the Saudi's.

It's all a matter of offer, demand and prices and "get out of the way governments and enviro wackos".
4 posted on 04/22/2004 6:38:51 AM PDT by JudgemAll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JudgemAll
In !850 this guy would have written about the disaster that awaited the world when whale oil ran out.
5 posted on 04/22/2004 6:41:20 AM PDT by don'tbedenied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
I remember when I was 5 years old in 1979 and hearing they'd run out of oil before I was old enough to drive.
6 posted on 04/22/2004 6:43:07 AM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
Note that the chart stipulates ...

"Reserves that can be recovered economically in existing operating conditions."

Well, that leads to several questions on several levels ...

"Economically" today does not mean "economonically" tomorrow. As the prices go up, so does the availability of pumping oil out of deposits that are not "economically-feasible" at this time.

"Existing operating conditions": well, we're already pumping oil out of places that, just a decade ago, were not able to be accessed with that level of technology. Who knows what technology will become available next year or within the next five years.

Finally, remember, in the early 60's, that great ecologic guru Ehrlich foresaw the end of oil in the '70s along with mass starvation in America and around the world. When compared against the inflation that has occurred since the days of the 25-cents per gallon gasoline in the 60's and early 70's, gasoline and oil is not really that much more expensive .. if at all.

7 posted on 04/22/2004 6:44:10 AM PDT by BlueLancer (Der Elite Møøsënspåånkængrüppen ØberKømmååndø (EMØØK))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don'tbedenied
It was predicted that we would run out of oil by 1920 before the Texas oil fields was discovered.
8 posted on 04/22/2004 6:49:42 AM PDT by Swiss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JudgemAll
Yawn... Coal and nukes... why don't we use them more to save on oil? Oh, I forgot, we cant because of windmill huggers.

And you can only put the windmills where the huggers allow you to...can't mess with their pristine view of the ocean!

9 posted on 04/22/2004 6:50:43 AM PDT by Night Hides Not
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
Oil comes from the molten core of the earth outgassing into cavernous mantle layers of the earth where it cools and distilates into oil reserves. It does not come from dead dinosaurs.............

Oil wells in California and Texas pumped down to dry in the mid century are now full again to the shock of their owners. It's just cheaper to import oil than to do it here.

Once the core of the earth cools down another few miles, I guess that will mean fewer oil reserves, but that should be right around the time we start beaming aboard the USS Enterprise, captained by Jeanne-Luc Picard.

10 posted on 04/22/2004 6:51:42 AM PDT by blackdog (I feed the sheep the coyotes eat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
Gee, most of the replies on this thread appear to be of the "we'll have oil forever" variety. If we're pumping it out of the ground quicker it can replenish, then there will come a time when the stuff will no longer be available. Of course, when that happens, the same people claiming that we'll never run out of oil will just claim its an environmentalist conspiracy.
11 posted on 04/22/2004 6:51:55 AM PDT by Junior (Remember, you are unique, just like everyone else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
"but our forebears lived without oil and thought themselves none the worse.

We shall have to do the same, so we might as well make the best of it. And the best might even be an improvement on today."

This has to rank as one of the dumbest things I've ever read on FR!

Let's all get nekkid, hug a tree and go live in a cave!
Sheesh!

12 posted on 04/22/2004 6:53:40 AM PDT by TexasCowboy (COB1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
"I remember when I was 5 years old in 1979 and hearing they'd run out of oil before I was old enough to drive."

That be Jimmy 'the dumb one' Carter.

World was on empty by the year 2000, according to him. Of BTW, did he tell you he was a nuclear scientist who knew about these things?
13 posted on 04/22/2004 6:54:03 AM PDT by snooker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Junior
"If we're pumping it out of the ground quicker it can replenish ..."

There's the fallacy of your argument. That's a mighty big "if" ... one that the Luddites have been foreseeing for the last 80 years or so.

Every year, new deposits are discovered. Every year, new technology makes accessing previously unobtainable supplies possible. There's no reason to believe that the oil supply will be extinguished any time soon ...

14 posted on 04/22/2004 6:57:34 AM PDT by BlueLancer (Der Elite Møøsënspåånkængrüppen ØberKømmååndø (EMØØK))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
Exactly when that day will dawn nobody knows, but people in middle age today can probably expect to be here for it.

I don't believe I'll still be in this world 1000 years from now.

15 posted on 04/22/2004 6:59:40 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Junior
If we're pumping it out of the ground quicker it can replenish, then there will come a time when the stuff will no longer be available.

Yup. And someday the sun will burn up all it's hydrogen, too. And, um, let's see - oh yeah, current indications are that the universe is open so eventually everything will die the ultimate heat death.

The key question is: When?

And while I won't presume to provide an answer, I will observe that every alarmist prediction on the 'when' question has been wrong - in fact, not only wrong but wrong on the trend. There are more known oil reserves today and more production capacity today than at any time in history. The will indeed come a time when production peaks, and a time after that when oil reserves are gone, but to say, "The only alternative right now is to shrink our economies" condemns the mass of men to "lives that are nasty, brutal, and short."

How is this a good thing?
16 posted on 04/22/2004 7:08:39 AM PDT by Gorjus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
In a similar vein, it was discovered that Apprentice candidate Omarosa was not injured by falling plaster. It was a piece of the sky.
17 posted on 04/22/2004 7:11:48 AM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: #1CTYankee
"Hogwash, alternative energy sources will reduce the need for oil.
Invest in hog farms!"

"Break the deal and spin the wheel"

Beyond Thunderdome
18 posted on 04/22/2004 7:15:04 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (60 Senate seats changes America. Who is your Senator?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blackdog; Junior
Okay, people! Common sense time:

No, oil did not come from dinosaurs falling in the tar pits. No one knows where it came from.

The reason oil wells which were formerly dry and now are pumping again has nothing to do with the earth's mantle or convection currents of the core.
Oil in a reserve is either gas driven or water driven, but to drive it, there must be holes in the formation for it to go through. We call that porosity. The connection from hole to hole we call permeability.
When a formation is "tight", that is, lacking permeability, the oil simply doesn't have enough transit velocity to fill the well bore so the well quits producing oil until it can replenish from the surrounding area. We call that lateral extension.

No one has the vaguest idea when the United States will run out of oil.
In our proven reserves, we have a finite volume which is based on the witch doctoring of figures supplied by reservior engineers, but we have hundreds of thousands of acres of land that has not even had a seismic truck on them.
Some of those will boost our reserves if the econazis will let us drill.

Because of the price of oil and it's expected increase, deep water drilling off the Continental Shelf is in high gear. Those wells will also boost our reserves.

The final fact to keep in mind:
We have enough natural gas reserves here in the continental United States to be energy self sufficient.
We are NOT going to run out of energy derived from fossil fuels in your lifetime or your grandchildren's lifetimes.
Burn your Greenpeace card, eat a spotted owl, chop down a tree, drown a darter snail and buy the biggest gas guzzling SUV you can afford.

19 posted on 04/22/2004 7:17:50 AM PDT by TexasCowboy (COB1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TexasCowboy
...eat a spotted owl, chop down a tree, drown a darter snail and buy the biggest gas guzzling SUV you can afford.

Best Earth Day advice I've heard yet!

Will do!

20 posted on 04/22/2004 7:21:33 AM PDT by American_Centurion (Daisy cutters trump wiretaps everytime!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-171 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson