Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Momaw Nadon
Yawn... Coal and nukes... why don't we use them more to save on oil? Oh, I forgot, we cant because of windmill huggers.

And by the way, every year new oil deposits are discovered as well as new methods to develop previously unpracticable huge deposits, like the one in Canada that is greater than the Saudi's.

It's all a matter of offer, demand and prices and "get out of the way governments and enviro wackos".
4 posted on 04/22/2004 6:38:51 AM PDT by JudgemAll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JudgemAll
In !850 this guy would have written about the disaster that awaited the world when whale oil ran out.
5 posted on 04/22/2004 6:41:20 AM PDT by don'tbedenied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: JudgemAll
Yawn... Coal and nukes... why don't we use them more to save on oil? Oh, I forgot, we cant because of windmill huggers.

And you can only put the windmills where the huggers allow you to...can't mess with their pristine view of the ocean!

9 posted on 04/22/2004 6:50:43 AM PDT by Night Hides Not
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: JudgemAll
And by the way, every year new oil deposits are discovered as well as new methods to develop previously unpracticable huge deposits, like the one in Canada that is greater than the Saudi's.

So true. We haven't even begun to do oil exploration in Antarctica, or Sub Saharian Africa, or SouthEast Asia, or many parts of the world.

I also read we have 300 years of coal supply (at today's usage rates) just in the USA if we would be forced to switch everything from oil to coal.

And as someone else mentioned already, there is also an untold amount of frozen methane hydrates on the ocean floors. We just haven't figured out how to recover them safely.

Certainly as a human race, we should try and conserve, but I am sure we have hundreds of years of oil supply available before we would have to devise a way to do deep, deep drilling.

By then, I believe we will develop hydrothermic power by drilling deep into the earth to extract lava power.

69 posted on 04/22/2004 9:44:24 AM PDT by Edit35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: JudgemAll
All cars after the year 1010 must be powered with small nuke plant or with windmill on rear trunk lid. Small nuke will cost you $2.5 million; the windmill will cost you $1.35. Gas cars will cost you $10 billion if the socialist are in charge.
91 posted on 04/22/2004 11:03:10 AM PDT by RetiredArmy (We'll put a boot in your ass, it's the American Way! Toby Keith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: JudgemAll
We need more windmills.
114 posted on 04/22/2004 11:34:02 AM PDT by biblewonk (The only book worth reading, and reading, and reading.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: JudgemAll
Yawn... Coal and nukes... why don't we use them more to save on oil? Oh, I forgot, we cant because of windmill huggers.LOL, so true.
121 posted on 04/22/2004 11:44:13 AM PDT by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: JudgemAll
Yawn... Coal and nukes... why don't we use them more to save on oil?

I can think of two ways to use nukes to save on oil....

155 posted on 04/22/2004 8:10:51 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson