Skip to comments.
Rush: Gorelick Quietly Asked By Kean To Resign!
Rush Limbaugh Radio Show ^
| 4/16/04
| LS
Posted on 04/16/2004 10:30:35 AM PDT by LS
According to an article Rush just read, Jamie Gorelick was quietly asked by Commission Chairman Thomas Kean to resign from the 9/11 commission due to conflict of interest. According to an unnamed staffer, she refused. Should we start a poll on how long she lasts?
TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 911; 911commission; bush; clinton; gore; gorelick; kean; lick; resignation; riskyscheme; schadenfreude; thomaskean
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 301-305 next last
To: hobbes1; xsmommy
Sen. Orrin G. Hatch, Utah Republican, who is Mr. Sensenbrenner's counterpart in the Senate, defended Ms. Gorelick. I'd love to see the files that the Clinton's have on Chicken Hatch.
81
posted on
04/16/2004 11:02:53 AM PDT
by
NeoCaveman
(Politics: poli means many, and tics are blood sucking creatures)
To: LS
Pay to the order of: George W. Bush for President $2000.00
Two Thousand and 00/100 Dollars
For: 9/11 Commission witch-hunt/GORElick/
& Florida DEMs death-threat on Rummy John Q. Public
To: LS
Gorelick needs to be asked why she placed further restrictions on the FBI and CIA a month before the Oklahoma City bombing.
To: PISANO
Don't look for CNN to do a "Should the bitch resign" poll anytime soon.
To: dmzTahoe
-Clinton calls Gorelick, telling her to fall on her sword resign, or else pick out her favorite spot in Fort Marcy Park to get this out of public scrutiny before it is too late.
85
posted on
04/16/2004 11:04:32 AM PDT
by
CFC__VRWC
(AIDS, abortion, euthanasia - don't liberals just kill ya?)
To: george wythe
Yeah, I've read that too. But I can picture the Repubs saying, "Oh NO, not Gorelick! (snicker) Whatever you do, don't select her! (snicker) Please, Brer Fox, whatever you do, don't throw me in that briar patch! (snicker)"
86
posted on
04/16/2004 11:04:47 AM PDT
by
mcg1969
To: Arrowhead1952
That's my growing opinion. As this has unfolded, the Clark attack, democrat commission members posturing, and now Gorelick. It's becoming apparent this commission has two purposes from the dem perspective: blame Bush and exonerate Clinton.
The commission is passé and increasingly counterproductive.
To: Eva
When the GOP staffer says that "We're in an extremely difficult spot on this," I assume they're referring to the fact that Gore-Lick is damaged goods, and a drag on the Commission (this isn't a comment on how she dresses). The longer she stays on the Commission, the more one can legitimately question the Commission's integrity and purpose. There may be some value in this.
88
posted on
04/16/2004 11:05:25 AM PDT
by
My2Cents
("Well...there you go again.")
To: Diogenesis
Bump!
89
posted on
04/16/2004 11:05:36 AM PDT
by
Rummyfan
To: bcoffey
I wonder what the tab is for the commission's catered meals. or their salaries, expense accounts, and stipends to "friends" At least it shouldn't cost us much to let them use the new Senate spa, which was being built while our economy was hitting rock bottom.
To: BlessedByLiberty
Absolutely - she must not be allowed to resign and slink away. She must testify.I agree with the sentiment, but let's be realistic: testify? To whom? To be questioned by whom? The same gang of swarmy politicos who refused to demand her recusal?
There's only one solution: take off and nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
91
posted on
04/16/2004 11:06:07 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(I'm not always cranky.)
To: PISANO
On the other hand, one caller to Howie Carr this past week thinks the Commission should keep going: as he sees it, the longer it goes on, the clearer Clinton's depredations become.
92
posted on
04/16/2004 11:06:58 AM PDT
by
maryz
To: PISANO
We need to put the heat on Daschle to ask her to resign.
Daschle is in a tight race, and any negative spotlight on him will hurt him.
Let's demand Daschle do something, and ask Daschle what he knew, when he knew it and why he appointed Gorelick!
93
posted on
04/16/2004 11:07:01 AM PDT
by
dmzTahoe
(Go Zags!)
To: LS
It doesn't matter. The whole thing is a joke. No one should pay any attention to their blah blah blah.
94
posted on
04/16/2004 11:07:46 AM PDT
by
Saundra Duffy
(For victory & freedom!!!)
To: sissyjane; holdonnow
Do you know what the article was? From memory, Limbaugh cited National Review. Not necessarily an article, but perhaps a reporter. "holdonnow" miht have a more definite source.
95
posted on
04/16/2004 11:07:53 AM PDT
by
Cboldt
To: My2Cents
It is sounds like the Republican staffer is worried that the damage has already been done and the results are not salvageable.
96
posted on
04/16/2004 11:08:05 AM PDT
by
Eva
To: mcg1969
"I have wondered whether Gorelick was a deliberate choice of the Bush administration, so that at an opportune moment the credibility and non-partisanship of the commission may be called into question." A diabolical theory...but not true. The ten commissioners were selected as follows:
1. GOP congressional leaders selected four of the commissioners.
2. Democrat congressional leaders selected four of the commissioners.
3. The President, in consultation with the Senate majority leader, named the Chairman (Kean).
4. The Senate minority leader (Daschle) named the co-chairman (Kerrey).
Thus, Gorelick is a creature of the Democrat congressional leadership.
97
posted on
04/16/2004 11:08:56 AM PDT
by
okie01
(www.ArmorforCongress.com...because Congress isn't for the morally halt and the mentally lame.)
To: Eva
"Gorelick's conflict of interest came to light on Tuesday afternoon, when a newly declassified 1995 Justice Department memo written by her..."
Reagrdless of this memo...she should've never been on this commission to begin with. Her position as both a Deputy AG and General Counsel for the DoD under Clinton, puts her in TWO relevant positions when it came to policies developed prior to 9/11. The fact that the Clinton administraion put such a premium on legalese...and treated terrorism as a criminal matter, makes all these top-tier lawyers positions very relevant.
98
posted on
04/16/2004 11:09:04 AM PDT
by
cwb
(Kerry: Sadr is a legitimate voice in Iraq being silenced by America..and Hamas are sorta terrorists.)
To: xzins
And it also says that she's a part of other things far worse that COULD come out if only right people asked the right questions.Yeah, we can sure be excused for wondering. There's another thread running today about the UN oil-for-food scandal. That scam was running all during the Clinton years. Are we to believe that no one in the Clinton administration had a clue that scam was going on? Or is it possible that some of them were on the take, too?
It would be nice if, in between trying to get President Bush to apologize for just about every ill that troubles mankind, the so-called mainstream media might come up for air long enough to ask just a few questions of Annan, Clinton, and their hirelings about the corruption awash in many power centers in the 1990's.
99
posted on
04/16/2004 11:10:43 AM PDT
by
Wolfstar
(John F. Kerry is a true Leftist idealogue — a true Leftist believer.)
To: okie01
4. The Senate minority leader (Daschle) named the co-chairman (Kerrey).Lee Hamilton is the co-chair, not Bob Kerrey.
100
posted on
04/16/2004 11:11:28 AM PDT
by
CFC__VRWC
(AIDS, abortion, euthanasia - don't liberals just kill ya?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 301-305 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson