Skip to comments.
Fox and Reuters: White House set to release the PDB from Aug '01 anytime now..
Fox
Posted on 04/10/2004 2:09:30 PM PDT by Dog
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220 ... 681-699 next last
To: redlipstick
WHY would he be giving Rita hell?
I'm lost and not getting it.
I'm on Fox now and hearing Mort.
To: alnick
They went after release because of the sensational title. The sensational title was published on the front page of the Washington Post, on Sunday, May 19, 2002. The title of the PDB was in the first sentence of that article. It was sensational then. Now it's old news. Let's moooove on.
182
posted on
04/10/2004 3:03:24 PM PDT
by
Cboldt
To: cyncooper
Rita has gone into OJ Simpson mode...
183
posted on
04/10/2004 3:04:17 PM PDT
by
max_rpf
To: TrueBeliever9
Bush will regret itIt's part of a master plan, dontch know? It seems to be working perfectly so far, huh?
184
posted on
04/10/2004 3:04:22 PM PDT
by
clintonh8r
(Vietnam veteran against John Kerry, proud to be a "crook" and a "liar.")
To: terilyn
It is my understanding that the only person on that commission who has seen the actualy PDB is Jamie Gorelick and that SHE wrote the synopsis for the rest of them and that's what he is working on!
185
posted on
04/10/2004 3:04:22 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: All
One thing MSNBC is asleep at the wheel. They are broadcasting a National Geographic rerun while Fox News Channel is all over it.
186
posted on
04/10/2004 3:04:25 PM PDT
by
McGruff
(This Sept. 11th Commission should change it's name to the Hang Bush Commission.)
To: cyncooper
Because Rita was questioning the timing of the release of the PDB, and she even agreed with Tony Coelho about it.
Whoa, Mort's trashin' Clarkie!
187
posted on
04/10/2004 3:04:35 PM PDT
by
EllaMinnow
("Pessimism never won any battle." - Dwight D. Eisenhower)
To: cyncooper
GO MORT GO!!!
He's trashing us!
188
posted on
04/10/2004 3:04:44 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: StriperSniper
And I've already let it be know that I'm a Freeper.
To: TomGuy
LOL! Like doodling while waiting for the test to be handed out.
The Left is desperate to spin this into a "Watergate Part Deux". The Times and Post already have the headlines in print: "What Did Bush Know and When did He Know It?" The full frontal assault by the desperate Democrats is on. In the end, I believe good will prevail and that they will fail.
Most sensible voters look to the future, and most understand that the Democrats have made matters worse by weakening defense, intelligence, and law enforcement. They also understand that the Democrats had eight years while GW was in office for eight months.
I would like to see the Republicans make more of the fact that the GW Administration was hobbled by the Dims sandbagging GW's appointments for most of GW's first term. IMO, a very strong argument can be made -- but would never be carried in the media -- that the Democrats were substantially complicit in 9-11 due to the fiasco of the Clinton's eight years and followed by their obstruction of the fledgling GW Admin. They wanted GW to fail and could care less about the detrimental consequences of their actions.
190
posted on
04/10/2004 3:05:19 PM PDT
by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(Any day you wake up is a good day.)
To: StriperSniper
I just love it when the Dems DARE the Bush team to show their hand...and I can just see the Bush Team saying "Let's see. First they'll ask Condi to testify, then they'll ask for the August paper to be released. Guess Dems don't know how to play poker."
191
posted on
04/10/2004 3:05:31 PM PDT
by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
To: max_rpf
And Geraldo's back to the OJ Era Geraldo.
192
posted on
04/10/2004 3:05:37 PM PDT
by
EllaMinnow
("Pessimism never won any battle." - Dwight D. Eisenhower)
To: ChadGore
ok, so we are going to have ASAP, the URL of the HTML conversion of the PDF of the PDB of the UBL threats to the WTC or is the SNAFU going to endure and FOXABCNBCCBSMSNBC gets it first?
193
posted on
04/10/2004 3:05:49 PM PDT
by
KC Burke
(Men of intemperate minds can never be free....)
To: Howlin
Er......
He's trashing CLARKE!!!!
194
posted on
04/10/2004 3:05:53 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Dog
Mort Whoever that Jarred (FoxNews) was talking to on FoxNews just said he thinks Clarke's book was the result of Clarke being disgruntled for not getting the head-terrorism-czar position in the Executive Branch.
195
posted on
04/10/2004 3:05:55 PM PDT
by
TomGuy
(Clintonites have such good hind-sight because they had their heads up their hind-ends 8 years.)
To: woofie
Ben-Veniste questioned her about the Presidential Daily Brief (PDB) of Aug. 6, 2001, and in her nervous answer she blurted out the classified title: "Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States." Ben-Veniste knew that, but could not say it because he and other commissioners had been allowed to see parts of the memo on condition that they not reveal its title or contents. Rice, in effect, declassified that title on her own. Many reasonable people will interpret the lack of follow-up -- she lamely said follow-up was not part of her job -- as stupidity and incompetence. What a moron this Reeves is. And he DARES to call Rice nervous and stupid?
As my link at 164 demonstrates, Ari Fleischer on the record gave the title to this briefing in 2002.
I hope Reeves has the grace to blush and reconsider whose word he takes at face value next time.
To: Miss Marple
Fox reporter says this is being released today because of a New York Times article. (Not a reporter...John Kasich.) What is in the article??
197
posted on
04/10/2004 3:05:57 PM PDT
by
Mo1
(Make Michael Moore cry.... DONATE MONTHLY!!!)
To: Howlin
Geraldo now saying with all due respect to the families of 9/11---the most important date to America is now June 30.
To: Sacajaweau
Guess Dems don't know how to play poker.Nope, life to them is a rigged crap shoot.
199
posted on
04/10/2004 3:07:00 PM PDT
by
StriperSniper
(Ernest Strada Fanclub)
To: redlipstick
Our worst suspicions about her confirmed.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220 ... 681-699 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson