Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: alnick
They went after release because of the sensational title.

The sensational title was published on the front page of the Washington Post, on Sunday, May 19, 2002. The title of the PDB was in the first sentence of that article. It was sensational then. Now it's old news. Let's moooove on.

182 posted on 04/10/2004 3:03:24 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt
The mainstream media is not above recycling old sensational material. It's new again because of the 9/11 hearings, so they act as though it's new info.
224 posted on 04/10/2004 3:12:35 PM PDT by alnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson