Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Aug. Memo Focused On Attacks in U.S. Lack of Fresh Information Frustrated Bush (2002/PDB)
Washington Post ^ | May 19, 2002 | Bob Woodward and Dan Eggen

Posted on 04/09/2004 8:56:04 PM PDT by cyncooper

The top-secret briefing memo presented to President Bush on Aug. 6 carried the headline, "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S.," and was primarily focused on recounting al Qaeda's past efforts to attack and infiltrate the United States, senior administration officials said.

The document, known as the President's Daily Briefing, underscored that Osama bin Laden and his followers hoped to "bring the fight to America," in part as retaliation for U.S. missile strikes on al Qaeda camps in Afghanistan in 1998, according to knowledgeable sources.

Bush had specifically asked for an intelligence analysis of possible al Qaeda attacks within the United States, because most of the information presented to him over the summer about al Qaeda focused on threats against U.S. targets overseas, sources said. But one source said the White House was disappointed because the analysis lacked focus and did not present fresh intelligence.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2002; 2004election; 2004electionbias; 911commission; 911memo; antibush; bobwoodward; bushhaters; bushknew; ccrm; democrats; lyingliars; lyingscum; mediabias; pdb; ricetestimony; smearcampaign; washingtonpost; whispercampaign
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-137 next last
To: unspun
I agree -- the legs now should be the Rats shallow attempt at exploting 911
81 posted on 04/10/2004 12:41:29 AM PDT by max_rpf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: BlessedByLiberty
"I would like to ask if anyone can help clarify something from the 9-11 Commission yesterday. Gorelick (sp)said that Minetta the TSA and FAA had not received any warnings of the summer threats"



I just checked and according to the AP transcript .. this is what Gorelick said about Minetta

http://wid.ap.org/transcripts/rice.html

First of all, while it may be that Dick Clarke was informing you, many of the other people at the CSG-level, and the people who were brought to the table from the domestic agencies, were not telling their principals.

Secretary Mineta, the secretary of transportation, had no idea of the threat. The administrator of the FAA, responsible for security on our airlines, had no idea. Yes, the attorney general was briefed, but there was no evidence of any activity by him about this.

82 posted on 04/10/2004 1:14:33 AM PDT by Mo1 (Make Michael Moore cry.... DONATE MONTHLY!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
"There is something terribly wrong with the state of journalism in this country. I've known it for years, but I still continue to be shocked."

No kidding! The Amarillo Globe News headline this morning (Saturday, April 10) blared: "SOURCES: AL QAIDA PLOTS IN MEMO". Of course, in the article itself, "sources who wished to remain anonymous said..."

If The Big Guy didn't enjoy reading the paper every morning (he's not into the internet like I am), I'd stop my subscription to the Amarillo paper tomorrow...
83 posted on 04/10/2004 3:56:28 AM PDT by Maria S (Assigned parking only...all violators will be towed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ntnychik; cyncooper; marginoferror; potlatch; onyx; devolve; PhilDragoo
Excerpt from WP article:

Link to the WP article here

Homeland Security Director Tom Ridge said yesterday that criticism of the administration's intelligence actions before Sept. 11 is unfair.

"What you have are some folks trying to do -- and unfortunately in a fairly accusatory way -- take the benefit of 20-20 hindsight with pre-9/11 information and trying to impart upon it a post-9/11 wisdom," Ridge said in an interview.

Ridge said there were no formal mechanisms in place before Sept. 11 to guarantee that the FBI's activities in Arizona and Minnesota were put into the overall intelligence picture, and that he and FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III were talking about ways to coordinate key agencies.

"The FBI's working on it; the CIA's working on it; we're working on it with them," he said. He added that the solution "is not more spies and satellites" but an analytic team devoted to intelligence about domestic terrorism.

Under growing criticism for a failure to act on the Phoenix memo and other potential warning signs, Bush administration officials have said repeatedly that U.S. intelligence analysts never envisioned the possibility that terrorists would use jetliners as suicide missiles and slam them into such buildings as the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

"I don't think anybody could have predicted that these people . . . would try to use an airplane as a missile, a hijacked airplane as a missile," Rice said Thursday.

Link to the WP article here


84 posted on 04/10/2004 4:38:35 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Become a monthly donor on FR. No amount is too small and monthly giving is the way to go !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: max_rpf
Don't forget your LOCAL talk radio host. I covered Nashville and Memphis. And bloggers you know.
85 posted on 04/10/2004 4:39:06 AM PDT by GailA (Kerry I'm for the death penalty for terrorist, but I'll declare a moratorium on the death penalty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Bush had specifically asked for an intelligence analysis of possible al Qaeda attacks within the United States, because most of the information presented to him over the summer about al Qaeda focused on threats against U.S. targets overseas, sources said. But one source said the White House was disappointed because the analysis lacked focus and did not present fresh intelligence.

Seems to me the President was taking care of business since day one in office.

BTW, does anyone know who wrote the memo? I'd like to know why he/she/they did such a haphazard job.

86 posted on 04/10/2004 4:49:08 AM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yall

Bush memo included three-month old information

08:29 PM CDT on Friday, April 9, 2004

Associated Press

WASHINGTON – President Bush's August 2001 briefing on terrorism threats, described largely as a historical document, included information from three months earlier that al-Qaeda was trying to send operatives into the United States for an explosives attack, according to several people who have seen the memo.

The so-called presidential daily briefing, or PDB, delivered to Bush on Aug. 6, 2001 – a month before the Sept. 11 attacks – said there were various reports that Osama bin Laden had wanted to strike inside the United States as early as 1997 and continuing into the spring of 2001, the sources told The Associated Press.

The same month as that briefing of Bush, U.S. intelligence officials received two uncorroborated reports suggesting terrorists might use airplanes, including one that suggested al-Qaeda operatives were considering flying a plane into a U.S. embassy, current and former government officials said.

Those August 2001 reports – among thousands of varied and uncorroborated threats received by the government each month – weren't deemed credible enough to tell the president or his national security adviser, Condoleezza Rice, the officials said. Neither involved the eventual Sept. 11 plot.

The sources who read the presidential memo would only speak on condition of anonymity because the White House has not yet declassified the highly sensitive document, entitled "Bin Laden Determined to Strike Inside the United States."

That declassification process is expected to be completed soon, allowing the Bush administration to make the document public in a historic disclosure of secret presidential intelligence briefing materials.

The sources said the presidential memo included a series of bullet items that brought Bush through a history of mostly uncorroborated intelligence that cited al-Qaeda's interest in hijacking planes to win the release of Islamic extremists who had been arrested in 1998 and 1999 as well as the trips of suspected al-Qaeda operatives, including some U.S. citizens, in and out of the United States. It suggested al-Qaeda might have a support system in place on U.S. soil, the sources said.

The document also included FBI analytical judgments that some al-Qaeda activities were consistent with preparation for airline hijackings or other types of attacks, some members of the commission looking into the Sept. 11 attacks said earlier this week.

The second-to-last bullet told the president that there were numerous – at least 70 – terror-related investigations under way by the FBI in 2001 involving matters or people on U.S. soil, the sources said.

And the final bullet told the president of a recent intelligence report indicating al-Qaeda operatives were trying to get inside the United States to carry out an attack with explosives, the sources said. There was no specifics about the timing or target, the sources said.

The sources said the briefing memo did not provide the exact date of that intelligence but made clear it was in the 2001 time frame, and that FBI and other agencies were investigating it. The information had been provided to intelligence and law enforcement agencies well before Bush's briefing, the sources said.

They said final bullet in the presidential memo was based on an intelligence report received in May 2001 that indicated bin Laden operatives were trying to cross from Canada into the United States for an attack.

A joint congressional inquiry report into the Sept. 11 failures first divulged the existence of the May 2001 threat report last year but did not reveal it was included in Bush's briefing. The congressional inquiry described the intelligence this way:

"In May 2001, the Intelligence Community obtained information that supporters of Osama bin Laden were reportedly planning to infiltrate the United States via Canada in order to carry out a terrorist operation using high explosives."

In her testimony Thursday to the Sept. 11 commission, Rice described Bush's Aug. 6 daily briefing as including mostly "historical information" and said most threat information in the summer of 2001 involved overseas targets.

Rice also testified that she did not recall seeing any warnings before Sept. 11 that a plane might be used a terrorist weapon, though it was possible others in the White House did.

Current and former government officials familiar with terrorism intelligence told the AP that in the same month Bush received his briefing, U.S. intelligence received two uncorroborated reports – among hundreds – suggesting terrorist might use planes but that neither reached the president or Rice.

The officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said one report in August 2001 said there was uncorroborated information that two bin Laden operatives had met in October 2000 to discuss a plot to attack the U.S. Embassy in Nairobi using an airplane.

That report stated the operative would either bomb the embassy using the airplane or drive the airplane into it, according to information provided congressional investigators and cited in their report released last year.

Separately, the CIA sent a warning to the Federal Aviation Administration in August 2001 asking the agency to advise commercial airliners that six Pakistanis in Latin America, not connected to al-Qaeda, were considering a hijacking, bombing or sabotage of an airliner. That warning did not have specifics on a time or location but said it could involve Britain, Canada, Mexico, Malaysia, Cuba, among others, according to information made public by the congressional inquiry.

Rice stated emphatically on Thursday she did not see any such reports about al-Qaeda using a plane as a weapon until after Sept. 11, suggesting the intelligence may have reached someone lower in the White House.

"To the best of my knowledge, Mr. Chairman, this kind of analysis about the use of airplanes as weapons actually was never briefed to us," she said. "I cannot tell you that there might not have been a report here or a report there that reached somebody in our midst."


Online at: http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/latestnews/stories/041004dnnat911memo.866b0.html

87 posted on 04/10/2004 4:50:12 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Become a monthly donor on FR. No amount is too small and monthly giving is the way to go !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Maria S
See #87 ...


88 posted on 04/10/2004 4:51:43 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Become a monthly donor on FR. No amount is too small and monthly giving is the way to go !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper; Carl/NewsMax
Carl, have you seen this? Come look!
89 posted on 04/10/2004 5:22:45 AM PDT by arasina (So there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Direct link to FReeper marginoferror's post #17:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1114825/posts?page=17#17
90 posted on 04/10/2004 5:24:41 AM PDT by arasina (So there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: arasina
Rice stated emphatically on Thursday she did not see any such reports about al-Qaeda using a plane as a weapon until after Sept. 11, suggesting the intelligence may have reached someone lower in the White House.

Richard Clarke?

91 posted on 04/10/2004 5:49:46 AM PDT by Carolinamom (Monthly donors have more fun!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Maria S
The Amarillo Globe News headline this morning (Saturday, April 10) blared: "SOURCES: AL QAIDA PLOTS IN MEMO". Of course, in the article itself, "sources who wished to remain anonymous said..."

What got me was even on Fox last night the reports were breathless about the "AP has learned" about a reference to explosives.

In this 2002 article, it talks about this "latest bombshell":

"Suicide bomber(s) belonging to al-Qaida's Martyrdom Battalion could crash-land an aircraft packed with high explosives (C-4 and semtex) into the Pentagon, the headquarters of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), or the White House," the September 1999 report said.

~snip~

So, what we have here is exactly like the National Guard story. The dems are taking "old news" and recycling it as new. And this time they got to do it via the 9/11 commission scam.

I think we can all expect the DUI story to make a return with some "new" revelation twisted about it.

92 posted on 04/10/2004 7:37:17 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Right_in_Virginia
Seems to me the President was taking care of business since day one in office.

Indeed, all evidence (as opposed to twisted lies told by the RATS) points that way.

93 posted on 04/10/2004 7:39:39 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: MeekOneGOP
BUMP old news that is new again.

The latest is the declassified brief won't be ready to be released until early next week.
94 posted on 04/10/2004 7:50:43 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Great cath, coop...I've been out of the loop since Friday afternoon, and thrilled that Drudge still has both stories headlined. It's big. Mainstream media makes me physically sick.
95 posted on 04/10/2004 7:52:18 AM PDT by chiller (JUDGES is JOB #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chiller
Mainstream media makes me physically sick.

That's because you are a decent person.

It would be funny, they look so idiotic with their expressions of shock and surprise and their attitudes of this is all new, except they are out to destroy this administration and it is not funny at all.

BUMP

96 posted on 04/10/2004 8:07:19 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Morning BUMP!

I'll do my part emailing this to various media sources - we need to get it into their syrupy noggins before Monday morning.
97 posted on 04/10/2004 8:33:24 AM PDT by EllaMinnow ("Pessimism never won any battle." - Dwight D. Eisenhower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
The "shock" (without awe) will gain momentum as November approaches. If there are still Americans who buy into this silliness, we deserve the Dumbocraps.
98 posted on 04/10/2004 8:38:19 AM PDT by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
The latest is the declassified brief won't be ready to be released until early next week.

Yep ! Thanks. I was looking for that release last night and this morning.

Then FOX News says this morning it's got to get clearance from some folks first. Apparently several agencies.


99 posted on 04/10/2004 8:49:09 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Become a monthly donor on FR. No amount is too small and monthly giving is the way to go !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
There is something terribly wrong with the state of journalism in this country.

BTTT!
100 posted on 04/10/2004 9:08:59 AM PDT by MamaLucci (Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-137 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson