Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

An Open letter to President Bush (End run vs. Outsourcing)
Me | Me

Posted on 04/09/2004 12:22:04 PM PDT by Havoc

Dear Mr. President,

You don't know me, nor do I expect you to. But I'm one of those voices out here in the ether that actually did vote for you. I'm not one of those seminar caller types nor a Democrat pretending at being a republican to subvert the party faithful in dishonest fashion because their ideas aren't popular enough to win them anything. No, I'm a life-long republican who cherishes the memory of Ronald Reagan and who thought highly of you right up to the time you sunk a knife in my back economically.

Sir I understand it's a hard job being president. I also understand that in IT my job causes me to have to think on my feet and respond to an everchanging environment just to keep it. And while I was busting my behind for a company I happened to love doing a job I happened to love, you decided it's a good thing to do an endrun around equal protection and hand my job to a Mexican worker at 1/3 of the rate I'm being paid. Sir, Retail employees get paid more than that Full time and they're earning below the poverty level. The Job I hold for the moment requires a lot of hard work and problem solving skills, it requires good customer care skills, and it requires a long knowledge of Computers and software I didn't get from a degree but from practical experience.

I worked long and hard for years looking for the break that would get me in the door with my current employer. And I currently have a carreer with them. Or had, rather. I've worked for EDS for nearly 4 years. I will lose my job just short of that anniversary or just after it depending on how the breakdown happens.

I have a handicap that keeps me from driving a car. Not an official handicap, because it's so rare a problem that 1/2 of 1% of Americans have the condition so it doesn't rate being called what it is. I'm a blip on the screen. But, it means I have to live close to my employer and sometimes rely on others to help me get things done. I've lost everything and put my life back together 3 times in 15 years sir. And having just accomplished it again after 4 years with my employer, your policy has killed any protection I might have otherwise enjoyed from having my job destroyed by foriegn competition. And it puts me right back on the brink again. Sir, if I don't stand a chance of winning, it isn't competition - it's fish in a barrel. Where is my equal protection under the law?

The "competition" didn't get hired because of race or creed; but, because of national origin. They got hired because their cost of living is low enough that they can be paid sub-poverty wages to do my job. They are taking my job because they aren't constrained by the laws we have in this country to protect us and preserve our liberties. Lower cost of living, and no laws to constrain them. See, we used to have what was called ANTI-DUMPING laws on the books before Nafta to prevent the subversion of our economy by those who would attempt to compete on an unfair basis and put American firms out of business. We aren't a global economy, the globe is not the United States of America. They don't respect our rights, our Constitution, our laws or ourselves. The average citizen of the world might; but, we aren't dealing with them, we're dealing with the leaders who have their boots on the neck of the citizen of the world.

It seems today that I have to be a Mexican to get a fair shake in America. There are some 8 million of them here illegally as a tax on our system and working here taking jobs that Americans can do; but, which apparently, nobody wants to offer a fair wage for as long as they can get slave labor off the books. That isn't enough though. We need to employ More workers from Mexico, India, China.. As long as we're doing it, sire, why not be obvious and lets put Sally Struthers on the TV to advertise IT Jobs for the people under repressive regimes in africa who can live on 52 cents a day, "the price of a cup of coffee." I don't care what color their skin is, No citizen of the United states could live on that and shouldn't be asked to compete with it. It's too blatently obvious that it's unfair. And that seems to be why it's "good for us all".

Your policy sir. It's you on the tube telling me it's good for me to lose my job to a Mexican worker outside of our system and in a manner with which I cannot compete. There isn't a job comparable to it here that I can take to make up the difference cause those are being outsourced too. Outsourced. How about endran. Because sir, that is what is happening - it's an end run around our system - around our rights, our laws, our constitutional provisions and protections. Your policy has relieved me of my job without due process. It tied my hands before I had a chance to respond. And so many businesses are being forced to do the same thing, that I don't stand a chance any more than those earning 3 times what I do in the same field who have lost their jobs already and have had to take 11k a year Retail jobs just to eat while their houses go up for sale.

I don't have a degree. I don't get retraining. I just get to lose my job at the whim of your policies and will likely lose more than that in the end. You see, I bought a new home too - a year ago. This job made it possible for me to do that. And as with my Job, I had to get a huge break to be able to pull it off. I've been behind you and a cheerleader of yours since I first heard you speak. I understand that the tanking economy isn't your fault. I understand it isn't your fault we were attacked. I understand and agree with pretty much everything you've done to date, sir. This however is in my mind beyond sickening. It is a betrayal of myself, my coworkers and every other hard working IT worker, Auto worker, etc that has lost their job due to this. It is a betrayal by their government and their employer. And it's a distrust you've earned by subverting them and me. For me, it's not just my Government, it's my own party.

Now I've heard all the arguments for outsourcing and all the copout phrases about what we do about companies that have outsourced to the US. Tell me, sir, how many of them outsourced to do an endrun around their system of government, their constitution, their laws and their workers. How many of them outsourced to us to produce goods for their home market. That isn't an argument that flies with me in the face of doing an endrun around us. They've built plants in our land and are working within our market, within it's rules, within our laws, within the constraints of our constitution and are paying a competative wage. Our companies are doing the opposite. And any way you cut it, it is economic and constitutional tyranny. I'm not a single issue voter sir, until that single issue is my life and livelihood.. until members of my own party call me a robber and a thief for expecting to keep my job when I've worked my behind off to do so.

I did it right. I've busted my backside under an ever increasing workload, kept my promise to my employer and my client. Never missed a metric, never dropped the ball for either of them and have always exceeded expectation as a member of one of the best teams on this planet in my humble opinion. My job is gone not because we didn't produce and not because either couldn't afford it; but, because Mexicans work cheaper and don't have our protections, laws, rights or constitution. I have a strong work ethic and a loyalty to my company that even now makes me shudder to say a bad word about them. I have no illusions; but, I was raised that if you do your best it pays off. I know now that if you do your best, you get kicked in the teeth just as hard, and if you get ahead a little bit, the government will be there to kick you back down. I appreciate how hard your job is. Mine is pretty dang hard too. But how about you and everyone in government work for $600 a month from now on like the Mexican workers replacing us. How about you all work for the income you're forcing me into. If it's good for us, it should be good for you too. You, and all the ivory tower types in our party that hiss at me for being upset over losing my job and wanting to defend myself. How would that be, sir? I'd just as soon see little Tommy Daschle and Ted Kennedy go fly a kite as hear them spout one more offensive evil lie about you. But I'd just as soon, too, see you join them holding the string if you're gonna ruin me and tell me it's good for me. How about if we just outsource your jobs too - oh, wait, that would be unconstitutional too, wouldn't it.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: bush; endrun; immigration; newslavery; outsourcing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 781-793 next last
To: rudypoot
Excuse me. I'm not asking for a higher paying job. I'm not demanding a higher paying job. I didn't ask the government to get me a job or threaten anyone. I have a middle class job that is going away not because we didn't perform enough, we're tops, we've never failed, never dropped the ball and the company is making a fortune off us.
I get a small fraction of what they make on my seat. And I'm not one that goes shouting for raises or complaining they aren't giving me anything - on the contrary, I am one who signed up to work for a given rate and haven't asked for anything more.. ever. I have gotten two raises in 4 years though because of my performance and a few small bonuses on top of that. I'm one of the very few that has.

I earned my position. It's being sold out from under me to mexican labor for no other reason than mexican labor is cheaper and the client wants the cheaper mexican labor now because it's available. If it weren't available, we wouldn't be having this discussion. And it took Nafta to do it. Prior to nafta, this would have fallen under anti-dumping laws. So it's not like I'm asking for something that didn't exist before.

All the same, thank you for tacitly lying about my position or misconstruing it decietfully. You can't argue what's there; but, you sure can run your mouth.
81 posted on 04/09/2004 1:57:14 PM PDT by Havoc ("The line must be drawn here. This far and no further!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Havoc
Do you support liberty? Does that not also apply to the business sector?

Look, I don't support many of the gov. programs to help businesses that outsource, nor any other business period. But I am absoloutly against any government telling a company how to do it's business.

No where, should it ever be a government's job to secure employment for its citizens. It is up to each person to secure employment for themselves.

Now, I ask you, what is it that you want the government to do for you?
82 posted on 04/09/2004 1:57:14 PM PDT by Texaggie79 (Did I just say that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Asclepius
I'm not voting for John F. Kerry, dude. That would be you, as the limp junior senator reflects your horror at people buying and selling freely. Free minds and free markets will always terrify those for whom security is an alibi for their wretched inadequacies. Yes, dude, I truly do not care: life does not owe you a living, nor does the government, nor do I. Nor will I ever compromise on issues of virtue or freedom.

You project things on me that aren't there. You are arrogant, you are uncaring, and I believe in such a thing as karma.
83 posted on 04/09/2004 1:59:19 PM PDT by brownsfan (I didn't leave the democratic party, the democratic party left me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

Comment #84 Removed by Moderator

To: kevkrom
I appreciate that you're in a tough situation. Where I do have a problem is that you are blaming the government for what a business had done and seem to be expecting the government to fix things for you. The US government just doesn't do that sort of thing -- when it has tried, it certainly hasn't done them well.

What's going on was pretty much illegal under the laws we had prior to Nafta; so, what you're saying is patently false. Nafta did away with anti dumping measures. The government by doing that set the stage for what is happening now. It's called cause and effect, sir. One company outsourced and started competing with others using labor rates available in another country. Next thing you know, those companies are competing with the company I work for and force them to do the same or go out of business. It has tentacles. The client we represent is putting pressure on EDS and all it's suppliers to do the same. And it's one of the big 3. That's a whoppin chunk of the US economy. So, you really need to catch up with all due respect.

As far as government assistance is concerned, you need to go check out what government assistance is available for IT workers put out of work by outsourcing. I can tell you what it is right now because that's the first thing the people I work with did - ZERO. No retraining benefits. We don't qualify because "we don't produce a product". It seems everyone has great advice for a situation that doesn't exist for me.

85 posted on 04/09/2004 2:04:49 PM PDT by Havoc ("The line must be drawn here. This far and no further!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Havoc
A "Recession" is when my neighbor is out of work. A "Depression" is when I am out of work. A "Booming economy" is when I and everyone I know is working and I am looking for a raise or a better job.
86 posted on 04/09/2004 2:09:36 PM PDT by Chuckster (Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoset)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ironpuppy
What's YOUR plan brownsfan? What's your big fix? Come on...waiting...

I have to go do some errands. I am in favor of some form of limited protectionism. But, I am not the president. When I hire a mechanic to fix my car, I know roughly what he's going to do, and agree with the plan, but he proposes the plan. If I don't think he knows what he's doing, I get a different mechanic. Right now, the mechanic doesn't appear to have the solution.
87 posted on 04/09/2004 2:10:28 PM PDT by brownsfan (I didn't leave the democratic party, the democratic party left me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Havoc
One company outsourced and started competing with others using labor rates available in another country. Next thing you know, those companies are competing with the company I work for and force them to do the same or go out of business.

That's competition -- I fail to see how an "anti-dumping" law would stop companies from trying to increase businesses by lowering their personnel costs.

As far as government assistance is concerned, you need to go check out what government assistance is available for IT workers put out of work by outsourcing. I can tell you what it is right now because that's the first thing the people I work with did - ZERO.

You should still be eligible for unemployment. You also appear to have internet access -- you should be able to train yourself in many things by getting information that is freely available on-line. It may not be a formal class or workshop, but at least it's something. Google is your friend for this type of thing the search engine should help you find what you're looking for.

88 posted on 04/09/2004 2:12:52 PM PDT by kevkrom (The John Kerry Songbook: www.imakrom.com/kerrysongs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

Comment #89 Removed by Moderator

Comment #90 Removed by Moderator

To: ironpuppy
Post #15 rocks!
91 posted on 04/09/2004 2:18:21 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan
Well, you're a Browns fan so there's one thing going for you. But you're late to the game.

I've been harping on our jobs problem for nearly 30 years now.
Fact: I was laid off from the auto industry in May of 1980.
Fact: I was downsized from Zenith Electronics in September of '98 during the wonderful Clinton years you refer to. My wife lost her job about a year earlier.

I'm tired of you suckers going out and buying foreign-made products because they're cheap and then coming and complaining that all of your jobs are gone and the government needs to do something about it.

But, hey, go ahead and vote for Ketchup Boy. Maybe he and the Ketchup Queen will bring back all of those outsourced Heinz jobs and you can fill squeeze bottles for them.
92 posted on 04/09/2004 2:24:27 PM PDT by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Havoc
"How many electronics stores would have the gaul to tell you after 4 years you weren't worth more than 7.50 an hour to them when McDonalds across the street was hiring at 7.50 an hour."

How many? Most or all of the stores who know that you wouldn't leave them, especially to go work in a more difficult job.

You only pay people what it takes to get what you want out of them, you know. It's called a job, not welfare, after all, and excess pay is a sure sign of poor people management.

So you don't work for Wal-Mart any longer, you're losing your EDS job, and you don't like MicroSoft products...but it's all Bush's fault.

Man, you are going to live a frustrating life. You are blaming everyone but yourself for the fix that you repeatedly get yourself into, plus you have an ego that won't let you stoop to working for McDonald's.

If you are *lucky*, things will get so bad for you that you will hit that rock bottom point where all of your old biases break and your ego snaps. Should such a humbling expereince occur for you, then you might actually change yourself and your outlook and begin to live a healthy, happy, productive life (even if it means working at Wal-Mart).

If you are *unlucky*, then you will just manage to muddle along at the very bottom of your base hatreds and biases, blaming everyone else for your own troubles, and never learning who you really are.

So like I say, you are in for a very frustrating life. You've set yourself up to fail by not being self-critical and introspective...and failing is what you are repeatedly going to do.

93 posted on 04/09/2004 2:33:15 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
The next easiest way to destroy a nation is to destroy it's economic base. That is why Osama went after the trade towers and the centers of national government and of defense. This is no secret. It is why we used to have anti-dumping laws - to protect the economy and to keep US workers from being put out of business by foreign trade.
I don't know why you guys keep repeating this stuff because it's a lie on it's face. It is the government's job to secure the economy as a national defense measure. They haven't done it. And Nafta has, as a result, aided in the decline of our economy after it began to tank and was helped along by Osama.

That may not make you happy to hear, but that's the facts.
The government didn't secure employment for specific citizens, and that's not what I'm asking. It secured the economy in a way prior that would have prevented me from being put out of work the way I have been. It is too late.
Government has already screwed me. The companies just did what they had to as a result of policy the government put in place - unconstitutional as that policy is. I expect the Government to correct it for everyone else. Me, I'll worry about fixing myself cause the government has already screwed me and made it quite clear I'm not worth helping. I'm just a citizen of the US. I'm nobody special. I wasn't given the due process that the constitution says I have a right to before doing something that effectively took my job away from me.

Let's face reality here. My job isn't outmoded, it isn't being replaced by another technology, it didn't go away due to being obsolete, I didn't get bought out by a local competitor, I didn't lose it because I did a bad job or because market forces put a stateside competitor in a better position. I lost my job because the mexicans can't seem to create their own jobs #1, because the mexican cost of living is far lower #2, Because as a result of the mexican cost of living being far lower, a worker there can work for what constitutes sub-poverty wages here #3, and because nafta did away with restrictions keeping foriegn business interests from undercutting US prices to bankrupt US companies and take over our market #4. I lost my job because the US government decided not to protect our market anymore the way they decided not to protect our southern and northern borders any more, the way they decided not to do on the ground intelligence. The way they decided not to let the FBI and CIA talk to each other. I'm out of a job because the US government dropped the ball and started something in motion that just got to me. And I'm not asking for government assistance. I'm demanding the damned government get off it's laurels and start doing it's job at least as hard as I was doing mine before they lost it for me.

I secured employment for myself and Government policy got me. What do you want to hear from me, that it isn't their fault that it's their fault for looking out for the interests of business instead of looking out for the interests of us citizens. I must have missed that part in the constitution where it says of for and by big business.
I keep hearing it's not their responsibility to look out for me; but, actually, that is their primary responsibility, is it not? Not to get me a job, but to get out of my way so I can do for myself and not deprive me of what I have without due process - isn't that what the constitution says. Where was and is my due process? I guess that's a good place to start. Government policy took my job. Where is my due process. Where is my equal protection under the 14th ammendment? I mean, I was put out for essentially not being a mexican in Mexico or in other cases, people have been put out for not being an indian in india. They had no say either, no due process, no protection against descrimination based on national origin. And no, it isn't a race thing, and that's not what I'm charging, it's a national origin thing - I'm an american in an american economy. I was put out of work because of that and that alone. And if that doesn't fall under equal protection, I'll eat my seat, my computer and all. And I think I can find a constitutional lawyer to back me up. Probably a bunch of them. I got canned because I'm an American working in America. Any lawyers present that want a client? Isn't that how we do things nowdays...
94 posted on 04/09/2004 2:35:44 PM PDT by Havoc ("The line must be drawn here. This far and no further!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: clamper1797
"Free traitor Platitude #3 3. Get a job, any job (just throw away everything you ever learned or worked to have)"

One of my firm's major clients is BellSouth. Years ago BellSouth would send its switchboard operators to class after training class. They took foreign language classes, people management classes, technical classes, operations classes, you name it, they had access to it...and many of them took full advantage of it.

But computers from the 1970's on have slowly replaced the need for BellSouth's customers to ever need operators...so thousands of them have been "retired" or laid off over the years.

What are you going to tell them? That you want to pay *more* to make your phone calls so that they can still have their old jobs...or that they should forget all of their switch operator training and go get a *different* job?

95 posted on 04/09/2004 2:39:16 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Havoc
"Nafta has, as a result, aided in the decline of our economy after it began to tank and was helped along by Osama."

If NAFTA has aided the "decline" of our economy, why are *more* people employed overall, and at higher salaries today, than back in 1993 when it was ratified?

96 posted on 04/09/2004 2:41:14 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Hi tech workers ... like chip designers ... are NOT phone operators.
97 posted on 04/09/2004 2:41:17 PM PDT by clamper1797 (Conservative by nature ... Republican in Spirit ... Patriot by Heart ... and Anti Liberal BY GOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: clamper1797
Im sure the free traitors will show up on this thread soon and explain how this is actually a GOOD thing, probably using a buggy-whip maker analogy
98 posted on 04/09/2004 2:42:05 PM PDT by clamper1797 (Conservative by nature ... Republican in Spirit ... Patriot by Heart ... and Anti Liberal BY GOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Havoc
"Right, start a new business with nothing while I'm going bankrupt and losing my home. That sounds like it will work. Heard this one before too."

EDS gave you a raise, you said...yet you are going bankrupt *and* losing your home?!

Whoa boy. You've lost your Wal-Mart job, your EDS job (but they gave you a raise first), and now you are losing your home.

Shoot, you don't have time to be typing at your own keyboard! You should be out working two jobs and interviewing for a third one because you know that you are going to lose those two jobs, too!

99 posted on 04/09/2004 2:45:49 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Boy you really assume quite a bit don't you. You guys are shameless decietful lying jerks. You don't know me; but, you are good at twisting what I've said to try and justify your position. Why do you suppose you have to twist what I said to do that?

100 posted on 04/09/2004 2:48:30 PM PDT by Havoc ("The line must be drawn here. This far and no further!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 781-793 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson