Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ANWR drilling no solution to gasoline costs, Kerry says
adn.com ^ | March 31, 2004 | LIZ RUSKIN

Posted on 03/31/2004 11:41:20 AM PST by KQQL

Edited on 07/07/2004 4:49:14 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

WASHINGTON -- While blaming President Bush for the high price of gasoline, his Democratic challenger, Sen. John Kerry, on Tuesday reiterated his opposition to drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, saying it is no solution.

"We deserve an administration that doesn't fake it to the American people and pretend that somehow by drilling in the Alaska wildlife refuge we can deal with the problems of America," Kerry, D-Mass., told university students in San Diego. "We can't provide the supply of oil America needs from the Alaska wildlife refuge or from any other source in the United States, because we only have 3 percent of the world's oil reserves."


(Excerpt) Read more at adn.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: 2004; 2004election; alaska; anwr; carbontax; dumbassalert; election2004; energy; gasprices; hoffa; issues; jameshoffa; jamesphoffa; jimmyhoffa; johnkerry; kenyanbornmuzzie; kerry; lurch; methane; oil; opec; petroleum; teamsters
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last
To: KQQL
"We can't provide the supply of oil America needs from the Alaska wildlife refuge or from any other source in the United States, because we only have 3 percent of the world's oil reserves."

This is like saying:

"We can't provide for the supply of tax revenue America needs by increasing taxes on the rich, or any other small group, because they only make up a small percentage of the taxpayers. We must instead decrease the government's demand for additional tax revenue by cutting government programs and stimulate development of new sources of income through private investment."

I don't think Kerry to bring himself to say something like this. It might cause his head to explode.

21 posted on 03/31/2004 11:56:53 AM PST by eggman (Social Insecurity - Who will provide for the government when the government provides for all of us?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
Drilling in ANWR would kill the caribou, and the Democrats need to register caribou in order for Knowles to win in November.
22 posted on 03/31/2004 11:57:46 AM PST by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ErnBatavia
I swear it takes three of this effette man to make half a pansied moron.
23 posted on 03/31/2004 12:00:39 PM PST by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
The proposed drilling area in ANWR, from the aerial photos that I have seen, is largely a bog. The major fauna there is the mosquito (when not frozen).
24 posted on 03/31/2004 12:00:55 PM PST by Army Air Corps (Communism failed because people like to own stuff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
This will hurt Knowles and help Murkowski. Big time.
25 posted on 03/31/2004 12:01:32 PM PST by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
Once again the AFL-CIO endorses someone who really cares about the workers. Let's see the unions oppose NAFTA(which Kerry supported) and support drilling in the Arctic (which Kerry opposes).
26 posted on 03/31/2004 12:01:33 PM PST by KJacob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps
There was a big name investor in the Gas Pipeline project. If he withdrew, it's a safe bet that the investment doesn't look like a good idea right now whatever state officials, mayors, and Sen Murkowski say. Later, if there is a later.
27 posted on 03/31/2004 12:01:53 PM PST by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
ANWR is not so significant beyond keeping the State of Alaska's budget afloat a couple more years

WHAT? Who says that? All I keep hearing is that ANWR is the 3rd largest (according to most reputable sources) petroleum find in the history of America, with enough oil to keep drilling for 30+ years.

28 posted on 03/31/2004 12:01:58 PM PST by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Puppage
Sure, but that doesn't mean it can supply more than a percent or so during those 30 years. Even Prudhoe Bay is only 17% of our oil. None of these are in the same league with Saudi and Iraq.
29 posted on 03/31/2004 12:04:30 PM PST by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: HarryCaul
The Phrase Alternative Energy is not dirty at all to Conservatives, Produce Alternative energy at a cost we can afford and we will all stand in line. But it simply isnt there and wont be any time soon. So for now we use what we have.
30 posted on 03/31/2004 12:04:59 PM PST by sgtbono2002 (I aint wrong, I aint sorry , and I am probably going to do it again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Puppage
We can also convert coal into petroleum...

In the 1930s a chemist developed a method of converting plant matter into coal and crude oil through a process of heat and pressure. His experiments were featured in Life magazine in the late 1930s. If they could do that with the primative technology of the time, we can certainly do better.
31 posted on 03/31/2004 12:05:13 PM PST by Army Air Corps (Communism failed because people like to own stuff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: KQQL; abbi_normal_2; Ace2U; Alamo-Girl; Alas; alfons; alphadog; amom; AndreaZingg; Anonymous2; ...
Rights, farms, environment ping.
Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
I don't get offended if you want to be removed.
32 posted on 03/31/2004 12:05:40 PM PST by farmfriend ( Isaiah 55:10,11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
While blaming President Bush for the high price of gasoline, his Democratic challenger, Sen. John Kerry, on Tuesday reiterated his opposition to drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, saying it is no solution.

"Since I'm not going to let you build refineries for the oil, what's the sense in drilling it," kerry explained.

33 posted on 03/31/2004 12:06:17 PM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
So it 3%!! It's our 3% though, Jean Cherie'!
34 posted on 03/31/2004 12:07:07 PM PST by Sybeck1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
BUT YOU PROMISED HOFFA JR. YOU WERE FOR THIS!!!!!

Ha.

35 posted on 03/31/2004 12:07:36 PM PST by rintense (Now I know why liberals hate guns... they keep shooting themselves in the foot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
He also disputed Kerry's characterization of ANWR as an insignificant oil source.

"The idea that a million barrels a day is not a help to America is ludicrous," Stiefel said.


Kerry a lying assmunch.

That's the same amount he's whining about OPEC cutting production by!
36 posted on 03/31/2004 12:07:41 PM PST by adam_az (Call your state Republican party office and VOLUNTEER FOR A CAMPAIGN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps
I don't know what they call that process, but there should be a demonstration or pilot plant in operation now. In any case, they are not building these plants, and other alternatives are also expensive. We're going to miss our cheap oil. Have you looked at the Peak Oil theory?
37 posted on 03/31/2004 12:09:52 PM PST by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps
One would think that Congress would lift the Federal regulations that deny domestic drilling, especially during a war with the very same people that we buy oil.
38 posted on 03/31/2004 12:11:15 PM PST by tractorman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Puppage
During the course of doing research on the US Navy's conversion from coal to oil, I came across a memo from the then Secretary of the Navy. This memo, from the early 1900s, stated that experts predicted that with the level of the Navy's activities, that domestic oil supplies would be completely exhuasted in 20 years. Hmmm, the oil that we used in WWII must have appeared by magic. The fact is, we find new reserves of energy nearly every year and our ability to access it improves.
39 posted on 03/31/2004 12:11:51 PM PST by Army Air Corps (Communism failed because people like to own stuff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
I wouldn't be surprised if Kerry's people are behind OPEC's shennanigans.
40 posted on 03/31/2004 12:11:59 PM PST by Paulie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson