WASN'T A CRIME COMMITTED HERE?

Neals Nuze ^ | 03/24/04 | Neal Boortz

[Kherghan]

And I'm talking about a crime committed by John Kerry. A serious crime.

We haven't mentioned this before ... but there was a meeting of the Vietnam Veterans Against the War in in Kansas City in November of 1971. At that meeting there was a plan discussed to assassinate members of Congress. Now ... let' emphasize this point. These anti-war Vietnam veterans were sitting there and discussing murder .. they were discussing the idea of murdering certain members of the Congress of the United States who were in favor of the Vietnam war. Well ... the idea was discussed, and the idea was rejected.

The reports of that Kansas City meeting are disturbing enough. It gets more disturbing when you consider the fact that our not-yet-crowned Democratic candidate for president was a member of that organization. Things get even more interesting when you learn that Kerry was present and a participant in that meeting. Yes ... John Kerry was there while his leftist anti-war colleagues were discussing murdering members of congress.

Now when these reports first came out the sKerry campaign was quick to respond by saying that sKerry "never ever" attended that meeting of the Vietnam Veterans Against the War, and that he had resigned the organization months earlier. Uh oh ... big oops. It seems that the FBI was interested in the activities of these veterans at that time, and they were being watched. More particularly, sKerry was being watched. The FBI records of that Kansas City meeting show that our presumptive Democratic nominee was at that meeting. No wiggle room ... he was there. Now it seems that the the sKerry campaign lied when they said he wasn't.

Time to backtrack. Since the FBI has surveillance records showing Kerry present at that meeting, the Kerry folks need to conjure up a new statement. So now his campaign is releasing a statement saying that sKerry " .. had no personal recollection of this meeting .... [but] if there are valid FBI surveillance reports .... we accept that historical footnote in the account of his work to end the difficult and divisive war."

"Historical footnote?" The participation by a presidential candidate in a discussion about murdering U.S. Senators and Congressmen is a "historical footnote?" John Kerry's presence at and participation in this meeting is an "account of his work to end the difficult and divisive war?"

We're supposed to be satisfied with the revelation that Kerry wasn't particularly fond of the assassination proposals, and that resigned from the Vietnam Veterans against the war soon after that meeting. That's it? He resigned? Well big whoop! You're sitting there at a meeting listening to your colleagues plan the murder of elected officials ... and you merely resign? Hey! How about going to the police? How about telling the FBI that you just heard some people discussing a plot to murder members of Congress? Isn't it a crime to become aware of such a discussion and fail to report it to authorities?

I know ... we've been through this before ... but what if we were reading stories about a Republican presidential candidate who was present at a meeting where the murder of liberal Supreme Court Justices was discussed. Would we be satisfied to learn that the Republican candidate rejected the idea and then disassociated himself from the group having the discussion? Come on. We all know what would be happening now. The Democrats and their loyal media myrmidons would be howling in outrage. There would be demands for investigations ... criminal investigations ... and suggestions that the Republican candidate be charged with aiding and abetting an assassination plot. Believe me, it would be a major story.

With Kerry and his anti-war pals ... no media outrage. No demands for investigations into that Kansas City meeting and any role that sKerry played. Nothing. You might hear about it on Fox News, and you might read about it in the Drudge Report --- but that's prettty much it.

This story won't get any traction in the mainstream DC and New York press corps because it doesn't serve the personal aims of the people who would carry it to the forefront. Well over 90% of the people who are in a position to ask these questions about Kerry's involvement in that Kansas City meeting, and his actions (or lack thereof) afterwards, want Kerry to beat George Bush in November. If someone else pushes this story into the limelight, they'll groan a bit and give it a degree of due diligence. They're just as happy, though, to see it just go away.

So here's what you have to ask yourself. Do you want a president who once overheard a discussion about assassinating members of Congress ... and then did nothing about it?

Think about it. November is getting closer.

[Kakaze]

" A Kerry nomination wouldnt prevent a switch. Remember Robert Torricelli? "

Yeah I remember. Which is one reason I think you take Kerry down now then whoever is next in line disect them too. Show that party for what it is. A collection of misfits, criminals and whores.

Disgracing one nominee will generate some sympathy, take a second one apart with the truth and you finish them off.

[NotchJohnson]

Ford did seem like he could be a solid black leader, and I hate to see him get sucked down into the Kerry camp and come out looking like Elanor Clift.

[Liberty Valance]

Bump

[Ole Okie]

Have you noticed that in some of JFKerry's campaign ads his eyes appear to be blue while in tv interviews they are black/brown?

Haven't noticed the color issue. But the fact is that J. F'n's eyes don't track together. I don't know what this condition is called, but it's disconcerting.

[The G Man]

"In other news today, John Kerry, 70s radical and has-been, attacked another skier on the slopes today ..."

The SOB had it coming no doubt! :o)

[Fiddlstix]

[OXENinFLA]

Did you watch(oh wait)....... Last night on john Gibson's show on FOX he had Randy Barnes on and Randy (w/ a vote for KERRY pin on) was slamming Libscome and saying the Assassination plot was put forth in a joking way and put down right away. It sounded like Kerry's was doing the talking.

[mountaineer]

in some of JFKerry's campaign ads his eyes appear to be blue while in tv interviews they are black/brown

Depends on whether he's Irish or Jewish that day, I guess.

[freekitty]

" It's too early for this to break, though. We need Kerry to already have the nomination. "
I don't think so. I think we'd be better off with a long run at Hillary or whoever steps in. The last thing we need is a quick rally on Hillaries behalf. "

That's the point. Hitlery is going to run this year.

[doug from upland]

Thanks for the report. No cable because I basically don't watch television.

[Just mythoughts]

"Haven't noticed the color issue. But the fact is that J. F'n's eyes don't track together. I don't know what this condition is called, but it's disconcerting."


I noticed this a while back, and because I was not sure that he was changing eye color said nothing. However after this last ad March 22 came out and where JFKerry is speaking his eye color is different than when he was on Fox with Carl Cameron.

I very well could be off base, could be the lighting, but I don't think so.

I know what would be done to President Bush if his eye color was the least bit different, he would be mocked and jeered about "deceiving" again.

[MEG33]

I was very impressed with Ford,too,but some freeper came along and discouraged me...He is not as moderate as I had thought,it seems ,in how he votes.

[Just mythoughts]

"Depends on whether he's Irish or Jewish that day, I guess."


I don't think so, not all Jewish people have black/brown eyes.

I think his campaign believes he looks more seductive with "blue" eyes than with black/brown eyes. More pleasing to the eye, DECEPTION!

[FreedomPoster]

>>Funny how FR is usually weeks ahead.

I've come to just expect it.

[Alberta's Child]

Maybe he can use the "I was not there before I was there line."

Maybe he drank so much iced tea that he was peeing for four straight hours while they were discussing this plot.

[mtbopfuyn]

Have you noticed that in some of JFKerry's campaign ads his eyes appear to be blue while in tv interviews they are black/brown?

You may very well be on to something here. If it's true, then it's something that needs to be brought out. Blue eyes for the Heartland and brown eyes to garner the Black and Hispanic vote.

[guitfiddlist]

The partisan media won't touch this, but waxed breathlessly about Bush's membership in the Skull & Bones Society, where they probably voted on panty raids and wigwamming.

And in light of Kerry's membership as well, that won't be mentioned again. Hail Pravda and like-minded Tass-h*les.

[Just mythoughts]

"You may very well be on to something here."


Not sure that I am on to something, reason I asked the question, because there are far more brighter and observant individuals on this site, than myself.

I just could no longer not ask the question, after the March 22 campaign ad released by JFKerry.

Guess you could say its something that has become obvious to me and with JFKerry two sides to every issue, does not seem out of the bounds of possibility that he would attempt to deceive with what seems to be an obvious eye color change.

[Naspino]

Wasn't Kerry also still a commissioned naval officer at the time (in the reserves)?

If true -- then you wouldn't a naval officer taking part in a plot to assassinate members of the American government constitute treason?

[savedbygrace]

I think you're wrong, but I don't know where to look to check it out.

I mean, there's a guy named Fortier in prison right now for failing to report plans to bomb the OKC federal building, right? Surely it's also a crime to fail to report an assassination plot on U. S. senators.

Anybody know for certain one way or the other? And if it is a crime, what's the statute of limitations?