Posted on 03/23/2004 2:59:45 PM PST by Pukin Dog
WASHINGTON - The White House, seeking to cool criticism from a former top anti-terror adviser, said Tuesday that Richard Clarke's resignation letter praised President Bush's "courage, determination, calm and leadership" on Sept. 11, 2001.
"It has been an enormous privilege to serve you these last 24 months," said the Jan. 20, 2003, letter from Clarke to Bush. "I will always remember the courage, determination, calm, and leadership you demonstrated on September 11th."
The letter was stamped "the president has seen" the next day.
Clarke, who left the Bush administration in March 2003 after 30 years in government service and 11 years at the White House, has written a book in which he criticizes the president and his administration for ignoring repeated warnings about al-Qaida before the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks and acting ineffectively afterward, primarily because of a preoccupation with Iraq (news - web sites).
On Monday, the day Clarke's "Against All Enemies: Inside America's War on Terror" hit stores and the day after he promoted it in an interview with CBS' "60 Minutes," the White House went to great lengths to dismiss Clarke's accusations. Administration officials, including Vice President Dick Cheney (news - web sites) and national security adviser Condoleezza Rice (news - web sites), appeared on television and radio to argue that Clarke was inaccurate, politically motivated, disgruntled over bureaucratic changes that reduced his influence, merely trying to sell books or all four at once.
That White House campaign continued Tuesday with the release of Clarke's letter announcing his intention to step down.
White House spokesman Scott McClellan suggested Clarke's praise belies his later criticism of Bush's handling of the crisis.
"At this time period, when he was leaving, there was no mention of the grave concerns he claims to have had about the direction of the war on terrorism, or what we were doing to confront the threat posed by Iraq, by the former regime," McClellan said.
But the letter contains no praise of Bush's anti-terror actions before or after the attacks only on the day of. Clarke does commend Bush for his "intuitive understanding" of the importance of cybersecurity.
Clarke's job as the White House's counterterrorism chief was split in two early in the Bush White House, with Clarke put in charge of cybersecurity and others brought in for the anti-terror role.
"You had prescience in creating the position of Special Adviser to the President for Cyberspace Security and I urge you to maintain that role in the White House," Clarke wrote.
Also, even though the White House argued that Clarke's memoir was released to do the maximum political damage to Bush in a presidential election year, McClellan would not say when the required national security review of the book was completed, allowing its publication to proceed. Publications by administration officials are routinely vetted to make sure that nothing is released that compromises classified information or national security.
The caption says TOO LITTLE DONE?
Then, below that, it says "Could al Qaeda have been stopped before 9/11? Was the threat downplayed or even ignored? Top officials from the Bush and Clinton presidencies were publicly grilled by a panel probing the attacks. "... so.... why isn't Klinton's picture shown? DISGRACEFUL!!!
LOL. And while you're at it, Clarke -- why don'tcha get yer head out of yer @ss, too?
Gosh, I must have missed when they criticized the Clintonoids for illegally passing Linda Tripp's personnel file to a reporter, or when Clinton released letters from Kathleen Willey.
Even if they are passing subliminal messages (abcnews.com), it's powerful.
Even if they place blame equally, it's disgraceful, 8 years of Klinton v. 8 months (really 5 months or less, once he was able to get his team on the ground)... How could that be parity in terms of blame???
NEWS FLASH . . .
Clark denies any knowledge of the resignation letter released by the White House today.
"I never wrote that letter," he said today through spokesman Tom Daschle, "I'm still working for the Bush administration -- I've just been on vacation for the last 15 months."
Details at 11 . . .
/sarcasm off/
Click on the story, and you see Rumsfeld! Nowhere do you see Klinton, Halfbright, Cohen, or any of the other stooges.
The Clinton's could not be involved in this cluster.
So Clarke puts the blame on Bush, perfectly logical thinking, don'tcha know?? No way political, naa! /S
LOL! You made my day.
MR. McCLELLAN: Well, I think we went through that yesterday. We went through a lot of the assertions that were being made. And I think maybe one thing to look back to is the Dick Clarke of January 30th, 2003, who submitted a letter of resignation on that day to the President of the United States. And I think this letter runs counter to what he is now asserting. Let me just read parts of this letter, and we'll be glad to make this letter available to you shortly here. This is in his own words. Mr. Clarke says, "It has been an enormous privilege to serve you these last 24 months. I will always remember the courage, determination, calm and leadership you demonstrated on September 11th." Then he went on to say, "I will also have fond memories of our briefings for you on cyber-security and the intuitive understanding of its importance that you showed. I thank you again for the opportunity to serve you have provided me, and wish you good fortune as you lead our country through the continuing threats." So at this time period, when he was leaving, there was no mention of the grave concerns he claims to have had about the direction of the war on terrorism, or what we were doing to confront the threat posed by Iraq, by the former regime.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.