YES!! Limbaugh discussing Kerry and the plot in Kansas City

Rush | 3-23-04 | dfu

[doug from upland]

Yes!! Limbaugh finally discussing the plot in Kansas City in 1971 to assassinate U.S. senators. Kerry has been lying. The door has now been opened. It is about time this has been on Rush's show.

[doug from upland]

If anyone can locate any of their family members, I will be glad to interview them.

[safeasthebanks]

Yeah, I guess all those posters that get "zotted" aren't really disrupters, they're just "contrarian" Freepers!

And should we all now be calling ourselves "contrarian" liberals? Too funny!

[savedbygrace]

I thought I read on a thread here in the past few days that the group scanned for bugs at two locations and moved the meeting both times because they found bugs.

If that's the case, I don't think Kerry would've been wearing a wire. Based on everything we know about Kerry, I don't think the concept you're suggesting has any validity.

[savedbygrace]

PTL

[Bonaparte]

Sure, why not? Afterall, it was ok to betray your friends if your initials were WJC. In fact it was ok with the left for WJC to sexually assault his female friends and supporters. They didn't see it as rape and molestation, but as "historical necessity." That makes it all ok. It even makes it ok to go right back to jibbering about "woman's right to choose" and "dignity in the workplace" -- without being the least bit embarassed by the self-contradiction.

To the left, it doesn't matter what Kerry did, not to them or to anybody else. They don't care if he's a war criminal, a traitor to his country, a sell-out to his friends and supporters. All they care about is getting George Bush.

[savedbygrace]

Plus, it's easy to get this across to most Americans.

"There are six witnesses who say Kerry was in the meeting and voted on the plot to assassinate several United States senators.

"Kerry FAILED to report this plot to the proper authorities. This FAILURE disqualifies him for any office under the United States of America."

[unsycophant]

Get over yourself Mojo. No one said the VVAW wasn't violent. The torch you are trying to whip the crowd into carrying, is whether Kerry conspired with this violent VVAW group to murder a group of Senators.

The FBI says there is no evidence that he did. He says he didn't. His former associates say he didn't. No one connected with the meeting will rat him out and say Kerry did it.

No evidence has yet turned up to indicate that he was involved in any sort of plot to murder anyone. Who actually died? What were the exact details? Name the perpetrators involved. If 500 people were arrested--why wasn't Kerry? What was later brought out in subsequent trials that incriminated him? What's in the 14 boxes of files that Nicosia didn't bother to go through that the FBI missed?

You aren't going to get many normal people to accuse a presidential candidate of conspiring to murder six senators based on your say-so; rumor; speculation; or ommission or revision of facts. If you can prove beyond any doubt that he did--I will be the first to congratulate you. Hope this helps!

[Sabertooth]

FBI Tracked Kerry in Vietnam Vets Group (WPost whitewash)
			Posted by Sabertooth On 03/23/2004 1:52:38 PM PST with 1 comment Washington Post ^ | March 23rd, 2004 | Laura Blumenfeld and Dan Balz ...The Los Angeles Times first reported on the documents yesterday. The documents were in the custody of California author Gerald Nicosia, who had received them five years ago as part of a Freedom of Information Act request. Copies of some were subsequently made available to The Washington Post. < -snip- > The documents shed new light on some of Kerry's activities and contradict some statements his campaign previously made, including the timing of his resignation from the group and whether he participated in a controversial VVAW meeting in Kansas City, Mo., in November 1971. Campaign spokesman David Wade said Kerry...
L.A. Times Overlooks Details of Kerry's FBI Record (VVAW Senatorial Assassination plot)
			Posted by Sabertooth On 03/23/2004 1:38:07 PM PST with 3 comments Insight Magazine ^ | March 23rd, 2004 | Scott Stanley Jr. News management may have reached an embarrassing low in the Los Angeles Times for March 23 where an article by staff writer John M. Glionna purports to offer selections from the FBI file on soon-to-be Democratic presidential nominee John F. Kerry, who was under surveillance by the G-Men as a member of the executive board of the pro-Viet Cong Vietnam Veterans Against the War (VVAW). Presenting items from 50 documents carefully selected from what it reported were 14 boxes of related government papers 12 feet high, the Times confirmed from the FBI and other witnesses that Kerry had resigned...

[John Thornton]

It might not have any validity. I think Kerry was too much of a dedicated leftist to betray his revolutionary cohorts. But, he may have done so. There are still some unanswered questions. I don't think we can say at this point with certainty that Kerry *didn't* alert the authorities to the plot.

[votelife]

nice job Doug.

[hoosierpearl]

There's another angle about the "old news". Kerry's main claim to fitness to be president rests in the four months in Vietnam. A recent campaign commercial said that was why he was qualified to be commander in chief/strong on defense. If that qualifies him it needs to be looked at.

I don't think anyone should be CIC who said what Kerry said about men in uniform while they were still fighting. Lies don't make a good character reference.

[Yaelle]

Was Kerry [Were you?]soft on domestic terrorism in the early 1970s?

My dream is to have him be asked the above, and the follow-up Q, "Would you support a peaceful, anti-war organization today voting on whether or not to kill senators?" (Even if the vote were no?)

[Piranha]

Where do these allegations come from? Do you have support for either or both of them? This is the first I heard of either.

[Dales]

The torch you are trying to whip the crowd into carrying, is whether Kerry conspired with this violent VVAW group to murder a group of Senators.

I do not think that is accurate. What I have seen, and it is a question being asked by New York Sun reporters as well as blogs well within the mainstream such as the JunkYardBlog, is the question being raised- Was Kerry present at a VVAW meeting where a plot to assassinate Senators was discussed (and even voted upon).

That such a plot existed and was discussed is not even in question. Cahill admits it. So do others.

The only question is, was Kerry present for it?

If so, he had a legal obligation to report it.

That is the story. There is no need to prove that Kerry was plotting to kill Senators. Just that he was there when it was discussed, and he did nothing. He didn't report it. He didn't resign in protest (he was still calling himself a leader of the group into the next year). He continued to associate himself with this group.

And he wants to be President.

[Hon]

"If 500 people were arrested--why wasn't Kerry?"

As an antiwar leader, John Kerry was arrested with hundreds of others after protesting on the green in Lexington, Mass., on May 31, 1971. The Nixon White House identified Kerry as the movement's most effective spokesman. (AP File Photo)

http://www.boston.com/globe/nation/packages/kerry/061703.shtml

How's that go again? "Stupid and smug about it"? LOL!

[GraceCoolidge]

I would agree with you IF the Democrats had agreed the President Bush's honorable discharge ended the "AWOL" issue. Instead, they continued to harp on it and demand records, then all the records just led to more "questions" and more record demands. The Democrats having set the standard of demanding record releases, I think John Kerry needs to abide by that standard.

[pete anderson]

The Leftist media will spin it so that the FBI Agents that were trailing Kerry in 1971 should have arrested those that were advocating the assassinations of pro-war senators and Kerry had no responsibility to report the events.

[rwfromkansas]

The question has been answered irrefutably with documents...he was there.

[Robert_Paulson2]

clearly john was a top leader of a terrorist organization, aligned for the violent overthrow of the elected democratic representatives of this republic.

---

Imagine that!
An american version of osami ben laden the terrorist murderor, for president!

No wonder the terrorists all support Kerry for prez... he's their kinda guy.