Skip to comments.
Call 60 min. 212-975-3247
Posted on 03/22/2004 7:03:40 AM PST by roses of sharon
Just left message for Stahl, and spoke with Hewitt's office.
They are getting alot of calls.
TOPICS: Activism/Chapters
KEYWORDS: 2004election; 2004electionbias; 60minutes; asininepost; boycott; boycottviacom; bushhaters; cbs; cbsviacom; clarke; clarkebook; election2004; mansoorijaz; richardclarke; seebs; viacom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-116 next last
To: roylene
Let's smear Stahl and 60 min as racists!!
Remember when you are a Republican and disagree or diss a black american your a racist.
Why should we not try this on the Hewitt, Stahl and 60 min?
To: JulieRNR21; roses of sharon; PhiKapMom
Ah, I see now ... thanks !
I NEVER watch CBS or any of the Alphabet New Channels. And I'm ashamed that Dan Rather is from Texas !
Are ya listen', Natalie Maines ?? ...
62
posted on
03/22/2004 8:37:24 AM PST
by
MeekOneGOP
(The Democrats say they believe in CHOICE. I have chosen to vote STRAIGHT TICKET GOP for years !!)
To: dirtboy
Drudge is now headlining the connection.
To: roses of sharon
Their agenda is evident, as it has been for 30 years of terrorist roaming the globe and murdering with impunity.
Israel and the US are the bullies, Islamic terrorists are victims of that power, and have only one way to fight back.
That is it in a nut-shell.
(Just like when Clinton was caught sexually harrassing a 21 year old intern in the Oval Office, KEN STARR CAME OUT THE PERVERT)
EXACTLY....they have turned everything upside down & inside out to distort the moral compass.....bad behavior is good; terrorists are victims; it makes me sick.....And we must keep on fighting them.
Thanks so much for this thread!
64
posted on
03/22/2004 8:37:58 AM PST
by
JulieRNR21
(One good term deserves another! Take W-04....Across America!)
To: JulieRNR21
65
posted on
03/22/2004 8:38:48 AM PST
by
MeekOneGOP
(The Democrats say they believe in CHOICE. I have chosen to vote STRAIGHT TICKET GOP for years !!)
To: MeekOneGOP
I missed it and don't see what we need to call 60 Minutes for on the article ...Well, for starters, how about the failure of 60 Minutes to reveal that their parent company, Viacom, is also the publisher of Clarke's book (and Hillary's as well).
66
posted on
03/22/2004 8:39:15 AM PST
by
dirtboy
(Howard, we hardly knew ye. Not that we're complaining, mind you...)
To: familyofman
I guess you would rather go on keeping your head in the sand. That's okay, the rest of us will make sure the true facts are known. Pres. Bush had been in office 8 months and the 911 plan was being formed long before that. What were Clinton and Clarke doing about it? Oh, yeah, Monica etc.
To: Landru
Landru.......just whose side are you on anyway?.....I feel like you are ridiculing me for taking action!
Or am I misunderstanding or misestimating you?
68
posted on
03/22/2004 8:40:49 AM PST
by
JulieRNR21
(One good term deserves another! Take W-04....Across America!)
To: JulieRNR21; roses of sharon
Just called and got a taped promo, and left a message about CBS's credibility, and called Clarke's accusation of Condi Rice "laughable."
The lady must be tired of taking phone calls, and is sending them to voice mail....
Keep it up.
69
posted on
03/22/2004 8:47:21 AM PST
by
ohioWfan
(BUSH 2004 - Leadership, Integrity, Morality)
To: ohioWfan
She could be 'out to lunch'....in more ways than one.....LOL
Taped or live.....we all need to speak out!
70
posted on
03/22/2004 8:51:45 AM PST
by
JulieRNR21
(One good term deserves another! Take W-04....Across America!)
To: Texagirl4W
I like Mansoor Ijaz ~ he has some good info ~ he worked for Clintoon and he knows what a turd he is. :)
71
posted on
03/22/2004 8:58:37 AM PST
by
blackie
(Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
To: JulieRNR21
I would be out integrity if I complained about a TV show I didn't see or hear. :)
We are winning ~ the bad guys are losing ~ trolls, terrorists, democrats and the mainstream media are sad ~ very sad!
~~ Bush/Cheney 2004 ~~
72
posted on
03/22/2004 9:03:32 AM PST
by
blackie
(Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
To: roses of sharon
Some said Clarke's just looking to sell more copies of his book and/or possibly hoping for a job with Kerry or a future Democratic president.
"He probably thinks that the Democrats have a chance this time and so he's trying to suck around for another job," Alexander Haig (search), former secretary of state under President Reagan, told Fox News on Monday.
"This is an outrage to claim President Bush is responsible for nine years of total incompetence in confronting international terrorism that he [Clarke] was a part of," especially when "the Clinton administration did nothing but warn, warn, warn and throw a few rockets" at terrorists.
Bush, however, "has a firm grasp on the global threat that is confronting the United States, the free world and nations that believe in the rule of law," Haig continued
73
posted on
03/22/2004 9:08:57 AM PST
by
Enduring Freedom
(Guess How We Ended Japanese Kamikaze Attacks? It's State-Sponsored, Stupid.)
To: JulieRNR21
FR's resident contrarians use ridicule quite often, as is the M.O. of most contrarians.
To: blackie
Is there any way Mansoor Ijaz could testify before the commission after Clark?
To: blackie
Is there any way Mansoor Ijaz could testify before the commission after Clark?
To: roses of sharon
Why do they not change the name from "60 Minutes" to A Liberal perspective in 60 Minutes"? Perhaps they do not want to lose all credibility. LOL! I stooped watching that extreme left wing garbage a long time ago. Why is anyone surprise? BTW, when was the last time 60 Minutes, The Washington Post, or New York Times endorse a Republican candidate? These groups are all far leftist groups that pretend they are not bias. The all hate Bush more than the terrorist because they are more concerned about Power in the White House, than the National Security of the United States.
To: not-alone
I'm not the person to ask ~ I'm not his booking agent. :):)
78
posted on
03/22/2004 9:34:51 AM PST
by
blackie
(Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
To: dirtboy
But Free Press is the imprint that S&S put out the book under. Isn't that interesting? Were they so stupid that they didn't think anyone would check? Sure looks like it.
79
posted on
03/22/2004 9:35:59 AM PST
by
mewzilla
To: familyofman
Are we now becoming the censors of everything & forced to call everytime someone says something we don't agree with?How is it censorship to criticize one-sided shoddy reporting and a failure to reveal a clear conflict of interest?
80
posted on
03/22/2004 9:38:54 AM PST
by
dirtboy
(Howard, we hardly knew ye. Not that we're complaining, mind you...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-116 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson