Skip to comments.
Notable documents offer new ways to teach history
Danbury News-Times ^
| March 20, 2004
| Eileen FitzGerald
Posted on 03/20/2004 12:45:38 PM PST by LurkedLongEnough
 The Louisiana Purchase Treaty of 1803. |
When Thomas Jefferson negotiated the Louisiana Purchase in 1803, the deal did not simply add 828,000 square miles to the United States for four cents an acre. It doubled the amount of U.S. property where slavery was allowed. By 1830, one quarter of a million slaves had been moved to Louisiana.The Civil War was not just about slavery, but about the expansion of slavery, which depended on Louisiana, Arkansas and Texas.
In that context, the parched paper treaty becomes an important milestone in American. history, said Warren Goldstein, chairman of the history department at the University of Hartford.
The treaty is among 26 documents on display at the University of Hartford until May 16 in an exhibit titled "American Originals: Treasures from the National Archives.
Hartford is the last of eight venues for the exhibit. It offers a rare view of the historic documents that shaped the governance of the United States.
On March 12, a group of Danbury history teachers toured the exhibit with Goldstein and Leslie Lindenauer, chairwoman of the universitys women studies program.
"Its an amazing thing, Goldstein said. "You all have studied history to be history teachers. What you get here in this exhibit are the things that give you goose bumps.
They stopped to look at the original voting record book from the Constitutional Convention of 1787.
"This, with the Bill of Rights, is the oldest still-used constitution in the world, Goldstein said.
"I want to get kids to see that this was a big deal. This document illustrates how hard it was to write the constitution. They voted on one point at a time, said Danbury High School history teacher Betsy Needle. "Personally, as a teacher, anything that exposes me to new knowledge and reconnects me to documents excites me, and thats what you have to bring to the classroom. I have to find what is drawing me to the information and then find how can I translate it.
 The Emancipation Proclamation of 1862. |
The collection, which is under glass and in subdued light to protect the aged paper, includes the letter Thomas Jefferson wrote in 1790 accepting the job as the nations first secretary of state. Across the room is the 1872 arrest warrant for Susan B. Anthony for illegal voting. They crossed out the male pronouns on the affidavit and inserted "she.
Danbury schools won a federal grant to work with universities and scholars to improve the knowledge of their history teachers and rewrite their history curriculum.
This visit was part of the grant program. Some teachers may use it as a field trip.The Civil Rights Act of 1964, with the original signature of Lyndon B. Johnson, is in the exhibit along with John F. Kennedys handwritten notes for his inaugural address in 1961. Also on display is Thomas Edisons patent application in 1870 for the electric lamp, George Washingtons statement in 1775 accepting commission as commander in chief of American forces and Ethan Allens letter to George Washington in 1778 thanking him for his release as a prisoner of war. The preliminary Emancipation Proclamation from 1862 is on display and the final Emancipation Proclamation, signed by Abraham Lincoln, will be on display for four days at the end of March.
Also on display is a collection of Connecticut Originals, inventions from Connecticut that in some cases, shaped history, from guns and aircraft engines to wiffle balls and silly putty. One Connecticut invention was the cotton gin.
"Without this machine, slavery would have died out, Goldstein said. "Tobacco was exhausting the soil down south and without the cotton gin as a way to take the seeds out of the cotton, cotton would not have been profitable. It was a machine of the 19th century that changed world history.
Another item in the Connecticut Originals is a photo and document about Prudence Crandall, whose groundbreaking efforts to educate young black girls resulted in a state law banning such schools and terrorism that drove her from Connecticut. The law was repealed in 1838 and in 1995, Crandall was honored as a state hero.
"This exhibit gets it right. A key issue of the 19th century was slavery, Goldstein said.
"Thirty years of scholarship and activism have given us new trees to focus on in the forest. As a consultant for the grant, I help them look at the shape of the forest but to do that you have to choose which trees to focus on.For instance, Goldstein said, no one cared about the Amistad 30 years ago and now the slave ship is being restored, there was a movie about it and historians are focused on the episodes larger meaning. He called it notable that Connecticut citizens stepped in to help the African captives on the ship who went to court to defend their freedom five years after residents of the state had driven Crandall from her home. The exhibit includes the statement of Bahoo, the native African who testified in the U.S. Circuit Court in Hartford in 1839 with his X as a signature.
Danbury High teacher Joseph Vas said the exhibit benefits from the verbal analysis of a scholar like Goldstein. He said his role as a teacher is to provide those insights to students to bring the historical material alive.
"Its a pile of old papers until someone brings it to life, Vas said.
"Thats why this grant is so important. We cant make these links until we know the history. Somebody needs to bring it to life.The Amistad display, which also included the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court giving the Africans their freedom, caught the attention of high school teacher Barbara Taylor.
"We think of the Supreme Court as representing the people. To see a Supreme Court decision hand-written would make history real to the students, Taylor said.
She also was excited to see the document of the Japanese surrender in World War II and to read details of the agreement.
"It brings history to life and connects events with real people.
The grant is funding workshops all year and a summer academy. It pays for Goldstein as a scholar in residence.
"This is all leading up to a dialogue about what we are teaching, are we providing a common experience for the students, what is worth teaching. Were revisiting historical events, Needle said. "We will create new lesson plans and new curriculum with essential questions. They are significant resources for the teachers, said Danbury High teacher Christopher Peterson, whos helping Needle coordinate the grant activities.
"The whole thing about this grant is that we have professional development all the time but you can see this making a difference. We are sharing ideas and talking about history.
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government; US: Connecticut; US: Louisiana
KEYWORDS: archives; education; educrats; history; historyeducation; papers; pc; revisionism; schools; slavery
Um, shouldn't the teachers teach what is in the documents instead of "interpreting" them for students? Why translate these historical documents into Newsweek-speak? What is a "new way to teach history" and why do we "need" it?
To: LurkedLongEnough
Goldstein should read his history more carefully------ TEXAS was not a part of the Louisiana Purchase
2
posted on
03/20/2004 1:03:33 PM PST
by
tsali
To: LurkedLongEnough
I noticed in another thread on American History that much of the curriculum highlighted America's faults. From slavery to the Indians, Asians, and immigration to American imperialism in the Philippines to woman's suffrage, etc., the subject titles were all examples of American oppression. Now granted, American history was never perfect, but from the subject matter it appears that some people are using American history and our schools to propagate the ideals of victimology.
The socialists have aways known that one of the best ways to destroy a country's culture from within is to destroy any allegiance people might have to that culture. What better way to do that than to teach the youth of America to despise their country and culture. When it's all said and done, who will be left to defend the ideals of America?
3
posted on
03/20/2004 1:16:43 PM PST
by
cwb
(Kerry: The only person who could make Bill Clinton look like a moderate)
To: cwb
When it's all said and done, who will be left to defend the ideals of America?YOU!
4
posted on
03/20/2004 1:26:42 PM PST
by
Redcoat LI
( "help to drive the left one into the insanity.")
To: LurkedLongEnough
Every history teacher should already be using primary documents in their lessons. For each unit, my students have to download various documents that I have collected and placed on the school's network for them. Each test has questions regarding these documents. These include speeches (Churchill's "Finest Hour"), eyewitness accounts (from the Battle of Hastings), and government documents(The Gulf of Tonkin Res.), as well as poetry (In Flanders Fields).
To: LurkedLongEnough
"This is all leading up to a dialogue about what we are teaching, are we providing a common experience for the students, what is worth teaching. Were revisiting historical events, Needle said. "We will create new lesson plans and new curriculum with essential questions. History is written by the victors. And the left was victorious long ago in the battle over public education.
6
posted on
03/20/2004 1:31:03 PM PST
by
dirtboy
(Howard, we hardly knew ye. Not that we're complaining, mind you...)
To: cwb
much of the curriculum highlighted America's faults.I just had my class read an editorial about why Columbus should be viewed as a hero and not a villian as the multiculturalists have tried to portray him. Some of us conservative teachers are trying to turn the tide against the leftists.
On Columbus Day, Celebrate Western Civilization, And Not The Cruel Hoax of Multiculturalism
http://www.capmag.com/article.asp?id=3158
To: tsali
Warren Goldstein Warren Goldstein teaches American History at the University of Hartford, where he chairs the Department of History. He is the author of the award-winning Playing for Keeps: A History of Early Baseball, Cornell, 1989, and, with Elliott Gorn, A Brief History of American Sports, Hill and Wang, 1993.
A former Yankee fan, Goldstein gave up the Bombers in 1992, no longer able to stomach George Steinbrenner. He now owns and roots for the Locarno Spirits in the League of Nations fantasy league.
Dr. Warren Goldstein has a special interest in baseball and American literature. With President Harrison, he taught a President's College course in the fall of 1999 entitled The National Pastime - A Brief History of Baseball.
8
posted on
03/20/2004 1:34:11 PM PST
by
Redcoat LI
( "help to drive the left one into the insanity.")
To: LurkedLongEnough
I would have a lot more respect for this post and the unquestioned value of the documents in question if the author of the article had not introduced the usual "it was all about slavery" revisionism.
As I recall, there was overwhelming opposition and a general feeling of hostility for the Louisiana purchase for
any reason.
Studying history is getting to be more and more of a chore having to identify and throw out all the "interpretations" volunteered by morons I would not give a second glance to under other circumstances.
Just make the facts available to me and let me decide. All the facts. Then just go away. Please. If I didn't have the means to reach my own conclusions, I wouldn't have the slightest interest to read most of it.
9
posted on
03/20/2004 1:39:55 PM PST
by
Publius6961
(50.3% of Californians are as dumb as a sack of rocks (subject to a final count).)
To: tsali
Actually, it was. If you read the description of Louisiana provided to Congress by Jefferson, it includes, among other towns, Galvez town. The removal of Texas from the Louisiana purchase was negotiated by John Quincy Adams in 1819.
To: LurkedLongEnough
It doubled the amount of U.S. property where slavery was allowed.What an idiot. I guess the only historical explanation for westward expansion was the expansion of slavery. Not control of the Mississippi and access to the Gulf. Not avoiding the imposition of an aggressive neighbor (such as Napoleon) to the west. Not providing land for the rapidly expanding population.
I'd love to hear this idiot next explain how slavery led to America's contesting the Oregon country with Great Britain in the 1840s.
Comment #12 Removed by Moderator
Comment #13 Removed by Moderator
To: Papatom
A quick google search with the terms "slavery french louisiana" brings back lots of articles that talk about French importation of slaves from Africa to Louisiana throughout the 1700's (as well as French colonists owning Indian slaves). So, it appears that the institution of slavery was quite well entrenched in Louisiana itself (not sure about other land that was included in the purchase) for almost 100 years before the Louisiana Purchase.
14
posted on
03/20/2004 2:33:17 PM PST
by
Zeppo
To: mrfixit514
Good for you. Hopefully with Horowitz and other's like you working against the bias in education, we can turn this tide. Because, from my point of view, this is were most of the damage is being done. I forgot what poll it was from a year ago or so, but they polled graduating college students...and the result was that somewhere around 80% had an unfavorable view of the USA.
15
posted on
03/20/2004 2:41:53 PM PST
by
cwb
(Kerry: The only person who could make Bill Clinton look like a moderate)
To: Publius6961
As I recall, there was overwhelming opposition and a general feeling of hostility for the Louisiana purchase for any reason. Amen!! Most people don't know that Jefferson, and his inner circle, had very serious doubts about the purchase of the "Louisiana Territory"; the spread of slavery being way, way down on the list.
Some of the most pressing objections were:
1) Admitting the LT would diminished -- perhaps to the point of insignifience -- the political clout of the NE Federalist states.
2) The question of did France/Napoleon even have the right to sell the LT, which some argued technically belonged to Spain who -- squeezed, and squeezed hard -- by France unofficially turned over the LT for France to "protect".
3) That when all was said and done, no one had any real idea of just where the LT began/ended either N/S/E/W. It was just a sort of "from here to here" type of deal.
4) No where in the Constitution is this possibility/opportunity mention; ergo, is the action of the LT purchase even permissible/legal?
4) -IF the US bought the LT would it automatically become part of the US? Or would be become a sort of Protectorate?
-Would or would not the inhabitance of the LT instantly become full fledged US citizens? "Half"-citizens?
-Would they -- the people of the territory -- have a choice as to whether or not they even wanted to join the US?
-If they chose not to and decided, instead, to become part of the British or Spanish (or even French) dominion, could the US force them to join the Union?
Despite what liberals would have us believe, the question/issue of slavery was not the "be all, end all" of every single Federal policy in US history.
16
posted on
03/20/2004 2:46:47 PM PST
by
yankeedame
("Oh, I can take it but I'd much rather dish it out.")
To: LurkedLongEnough
Teach History! I agree but teach without agenda. History taught in the America schools insinuates that all Slaves were brought to and transported by the United States to the United States, and that the United States is solely responsible for slavery. This perception taught to Minority students is the primary reason for much of the racial discord we have today in our country.
Muslims were among the first to move large quantities of slaves out of Africa, the slave trade moved from Africa East on foot. Sea transportation moved slaves from Africa West, the Portuguese, Spanish, French, English, Dutch, most sea going nations had a hand in the slave trade. The United States had little to do with the actual transportation of slaves.
The accepted figure of aprox. 12 million is the number slaves that were transported from Africa to the Americas. ( Americas being North , South, and the Caribbean.) 5% or aprox. 600,000 landed in the United States. The eventual fate of these slaves landed in the United States was that of Supreme Court Judges, Senators, Congressmen, Governors, Mayors, Judges, Doctors, Educators, Businessmen. Does not happen in many other countries in the World. This is what should be taught.
17
posted on
03/20/2004 3:23:08 PM PST
by
BIGZ
To: BIGZ
Many Freepers might be surprised to know how some once conservative Christian colleges are indoctrinating "white guilt" liberalism around the organizing theme of slavery.
The net effect is to increase racial polarization, to strengthern "Identity Politics" while providing brainwashed soliders for the armies of up-and-coming radical socialists such as media-darling Barach Obama, Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate in Illinois.
There, the Peoples Republics of Evanston and Oark Park and the Jesse Jackonites are at the vanguard of this agenda-driven new approach to history as it plays out in realpolitik. And then there's the public "education" establishment.
To: LurkedLongEnough
"Um, shouldn't the teachers teach what is in the documents instead of "interpreting" them for students? Why translate these historical documents into Newsweek-speak? What is a "new way to teach history" and why do we "need" it?"
Because for most students, history is a boring list of dates and names and not much of anything to tell them why those dates and names are important. You can't teach what's in the documents unless you put those documents in the context in which they were written, and you can't do that unless you tell the students the STORY that makes it all real to them.
I ran a discussion several times in the class I used to work with, in which I led them through the history of our country to the beginning of our involvement in the Vietnam war. I've had several of them tell me they learned more in 5 minutes with me than in an entire semester of US History.
I started them with the question: "Who was our very first ally in the Revolutionary War?"
"Who did we help when they were occupied by Germany during the First World War?" and "Who did we help when they were occupied during the Second World War." "What was the former name for Viet Nam?" "What response did Ho Chi Minh get when he asked for help against the occupiers of his nation?" "From whom did he get help?"
They begin to see how one event is linked with another, and how those events affect a third, sometimes decades or centuries later. Mind you, I was doing In-School Restriction, so I didn't have the best students in the school, but they got the point. Most social studies teachers are coaches, too. Most of them (although fortunately, not all)would rather talk about sports in class.
19
posted on
03/20/2004 9:48:17 PM PST
by
Old Student
(WRM, MSgt, USAF (Ret.))
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson