Posted on 03/14/2004 7:26:23 PM PST by Pokey78
WASHINGTON
Presumably unaware of the presence of a live microphone, Senator John Kerry, campaigning last week in Chicago, let loose with his opinion of Republicans opposing him as "the most crooked, you know, lying group I've ever seen."
My first reaction like that of millions of parents and schoolteachers around the country was to wince at a prominent politician's use of "you know," a halting interjection that has been cluttering the speech of teenagers for years.
Only later, as the rest of the Kerry condemnation sunk in, did I wonder: Was it wise for a candidate for president to characterize Republicans tens of millions of American voters, including even veterans as thieves and liars? And if the double slur had been part of a pour-it-on strategy, was it tactically smart to take the low road so early?
But perhaps, I thought charitably, Kerry's thumb in the eye was unintentional. It could have been the blurted blunder of a tired campaigner, similar to Kerry's crack, also caught on tape, at Howard Dean when that Democratic primary opponent was riding high: "You can't make 15 gaffes a week and be president."
If his blunderbuss slander of Republicans as "the most crooked, you know, lying group" had been merely the irritated effusion of an exhausted speaker, I reasoned, Kerry would take care of it gracefully. To make lemonade out of his lemon, all he would have to say was something like "I was speaking of the vicious G.O.P. attack machine, not the legions of honest, truthful Republicans whose support I seek especially those being outsourced by free-traitorous Benedict Arnold companies."
But then something revealing happened. Kerry chose not to brush it off easily. On the contrary, in full macho mode he declared to a news conference that "I have no intention whatsoever of apologizing for my remarks."
Obviously, the day after his overheard slander, the decision was made to strike a defiantly nonapologetic pose. Maybe Kerry-Kennedy-Soros masterminds in Boston passed the word to the candidate: Apologies are for wimps. Don't even think of flip-flopping with an "I meant" on the contrary, ram "crooked and lying" down Republican throats. Remember the title of Barry Goldwater's book "With No Apologies." Show you're decisive by refusing to back off anything. John Edwards just proved that nice guys get great press clips but don't win elections.
Such advice is what the best political columnist of the past century, Stewart Alsop, said causes politicians to become "phony tough." To counter the demonstrated tough-mindedness of a war president, Kerry's handlers want their man to strike a pose of toughness in all his rhetoric.
But does a bemedaled veteran his physical courage proved four decades ago need to demonstrate a phony toughness today, by defending a silly insult? Evidently the Boston attack machine thought a strident nonapology was necessary to enlist the Deaniacs and "energize the base," to shuck off Kerry's reputation as "nuanced," and the candidate swallowed that advice. Kerry's closest-in aide boasted to The New York Times: "Everything he has said into an open mike has been prescient."
That's not the real John Kerry, a dignified man long steeped in civility. That's a phony-tough John Kerry, obeying instructions to imitate a partisan caricature of George W. Bush.
Helpfully, National Public Radio dug up Bush's vulgar characterization of a Times reporter four years ago, to which Dick Cheney had agreed "Big time." No apology was tendered then, so Kerry thought he could out-nonapologize Bush now and be seen as even tougher, because Bush had disparaged only one journalist, while Kerry now revels in reviling millions of those crooked, lying Republicans.
Kerry's pollsters apparently told him that his defiant embrace of the nasty crack backfired, and he was being tagged not as deliciously tough but as distastefully negative.
The other night, uncomfortable in his role as the Massachusetts Mauler, Kerry spun around with a gentlemanly "Americans shouldn't have to put up with eight months of sniping," and deplored "personal attacks." Hustling to the high road, Democratic weekend commercials flip-flopped too, enervating the base but calming independents with crocodile tears about "misleading negative ads."
It was, like, I mean, you know, an indirect apology.
E-mail: safire@nytimes.com
When it was played on Fox News, I thought that Kerry was saying "the most crooked...," then pausing to think of something to add, and they guy to whom he was speaking said "I know," during the pause, and John F'n finished with "lying group I've ever seen."
I think that strategy is a wise one.
Hildabeast is best known for her faulty memory ... "I don't remember" or "I don't recall"!
Yeah, but sort of like, you know, not admitting anything fer shirrr!
Kerry will not wear well between now and November. He tries to puff out his chest, but he's the American version of a cheese-eating surrender monkey. He's too Euro-poofy for anywhere but Massachusetts.
That's not the real John Kerry, a dignified man long steeped in civility
Does Safire want his phone number? Kerry wasn't "brave" in Nam, he was the victim of an accident. He went there ONLY to curry points to be like his model, the original JFnK.
It is impossible for a gigolo Liberal to be "dignified."
FR has taught me at least 2 things:
1. Homeschooling is good
2. Safire ain't one of us.
Say, what?
After all the chest-thumping has died down, this is the part I still find disturbing. Does anyone really believe it was accidental? I think he did it on puropse, it fits his character pattern. And thats the problem. He's like a little bitch in high school who doesn't have the guts to challenge you, so he "whispers" it loud enough for you to overhear. What a joke. This man wants to lead America?
Perhaps "all those world leaders" that want him to win will step up and teach him to be a man first. LOL.
I think Safire was the wordsmith who dreamed up some of the caustic phrases that made Spiro Agnew so controversial when he went on the attack on Nixon's behalf. Dean, Clark, and Kerry have all out-Agnewed Agnew by now.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.