Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poll: Kerry would be choice of terrorists (majority think terrorists prefer Kerry as pres.)
UPI ^ | 3-12-04

Posted on 03/12/2004 5:39:08 PM PST by Indy Pendance

WASHINGTON, March 12 (UPI) -- A survey by a Washington pollster released Friday found a majority of those surveyed think terrorists would prefer to have Sen. John F. Kerry as president.

The Andres McKenna Research survey of 800 registered voters shows Kerry defeating Bush in the general election, 47 percent to 45 percent, with 9 percent undecided.

Asked, "Who do you think the terrorists would prefer to have as president," the independent poll found that 60 percent said Kerry while 25 percent said Bush.

The poll, which has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.5 percentage points, also found that 51 percent of those surveyed thought Bush would win the 2004 election against 39 percent who said Kerry.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2004; alqaedavote; commiesforkerry; kerry; polls
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last
To: AngrySpud
because sadly, we have a huge leftist contingent in this country that truly thinks bush is a bigger problem than osama bin laden. they really dont care about terrorism.

the leftists would probably support terrorism as long as the terrorists only killed christians and republicans. Look at how the deified the kook Ted Kasinski.
61 posted on 03/12/2004 7:49:06 PM PST by WOSG (http://freedomstruth.blogspot.com - Disturb, manipulate, demonstrate for the right thing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Eva
well, one would like to think. it is not impossible to imagine a sufficient number of american voters choosing an anti-american president. however- it would be more the result of idiot voters being duped by the commie media than it would be from thinking americans choosing to socialize and atheize their country.

why in the hell have we let athiest communists commandeer our media and educational institutions?!?!
62 posted on 03/12/2004 7:53:10 PM PST by getitright (often wrong but never in doubt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: reformedliberal
Well, I don't think I'm just
"telling myself this". I tried
to reason it out from the poll
inconsistencies. I doubt the
respondents MEANT to seem pro-
terrorist or wacko by so many
admitting they're voting for the
weak-on-terror guy, Kerry.

A more sophisticated sample
would've lied to say that their
chqice would be tougher than W,
rather than reveal themselves
in such a bad light. That these
blundered into this unawares does
suggest an Oprah-ish tinge here.

Yet, W was about even...

These might have skewed the #s
by lying about themselves, but
they failed to cover themselves
on the Kerry ys. terror angle.
Not bright..
63 posted on 03/12/2004 9:01:08 PM PST by txrangerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
North Korea puts hopes in John Kerry

Two months ago, Sen. John Kerry said on CNN that, "We would be in a less dangerous world than we are today with North Korea if President Bush had used just engaged in bilateral talks with dictator Kim Jong Il."

It was one of those cases of a Democrat opposing the Republican just because he is a Republican. The current six-way talks, involving most importantly China in negotiations to end North Korean dictatorship's pursuit of nuclear weapons, are obviously the best approach to Kim's threats.

The bilateral approach really is a unilateral approach, the kind Kerry claims to oppose elsewhere, even when a rogue tyrant is torturing and murdering his own people and the rest of the world is too selfish to act.

As organized by the Bush administration, the six-party talks include China, Russia, Japan and South Korea. It's obvious that China, the nation that saved North Korean totalitarianism 50-plus years ago, is key to making Kim act responsibly.

But now Reuters and other news media report that Kim is counting on Kerry's election if his demands for free oil and other prizes from the United States are to have a chance.

North Korea's state controlled media have not commented at length on Kerry, but they have cited approvingly the U.S. senator's criticism of Bush's rejection of bilateral nuclear deal-making with Pyongyang, says Reuters.

In free South Korea, the Chosun Ilbo newspaper on March 4 ran a political cartoon showing Kim Jong Il phoning Kerry campaign headquarters to ask, "Is there anything I can do to help?"


64 posted on 03/12/2004 11:02:36 PM PST by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
That certainly suggests that a lot of people have confused priorities.

Obviously so, when a lot of people would vote for a candidate that promotes the taking of even more of one's hard earned wealth, when we have a POTUS now that promotes just the opposite, while the market gradually rises to higher levels!

65 posted on 03/13/2004 12:55:25 AM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
Who did these people poll?
66 posted on 03/13/2004 12:58:33 AM PST by Mo1 (Do you want a president who injects poison into his skull for vanity?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
No surprise here.
67 posted on 03/13/2004 2:23:33 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The democRATS are near the tipping point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
kerry/osama in 04
68 posted on 03/13/2004 2:26:06 AM PST by rrrod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
bump
69 posted on 03/13/2004 2:35:25 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deep
Please, please, please.....

Kerry without the rug.
70 posted on 03/13/2004 3:57:12 AM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (Intelligence failed us, because — I was on the Intelligence Committee-John Effing Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Proud Infidel
Kerry is soooooo screwed.
71 posted on 03/13/2004 4:31:56 AM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

BUMP
72 posted on 03/13/2004 4:44:50 AM PST by BunnySlippers (Help Bring Colly-fornia Back ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: reformedliberal
>>So a majority would vote for the terrorist candidate?

At least they're aware they are being duped.
73 posted on 03/13/2004 5:00:29 AM PST by The Raven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
See #48 & #63
74 posted on 03/13/2004 5:05:51 AM PST by txrangerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
Hey people, let's not forget Kerry's newest supporter, Kim Jong-il of North Korea. Yep that's right, that crazy midget despot is reportedly playing Kerry's speeches verbatim over NK's state run media.

Now that's some foreign 'leader' to have backing from, isn't it!

75 posted on 03/13/2004 5:49:26 AM PST by Condor51 ("Diplomacy without arms is like music without instruments." -- Frederick the Great)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeekOneGOP
Thanks for adding the quote in the lower right hand corner.


76 posted on 03/13/2004 9:17:29 AM PST by Grampa Dave (America can't afford a 9/10 John F'onda al Querry after 9/11.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
You bet, Grampa ! ;^)

77 posted on 03/13/2004 9:41:38 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (The Democrats say they believe in CHOICE. I have chosen to vote STRAIGHT TICKET GOP for years !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
Should be front page news everywhere (but it won't get a mention in the lamestream press.)
78 posted on 03/13/2004 1:05:25 PM PST by talleyman (John Kerry won the Al Quaeda primary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
Al Querry Al Querry
he's the man
if he can't do it
no one quan!

LOL!

79 posted on 03/13/2004 1:11:59 PM PST by talleyman (John Kerry won the Al Quaeda primary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Anubus
Didn't a 9-11 family member say they would vote for saddam over Bush?
Perhaps, or perhaps not. Lots of people claim to have fought in Vietnam, and are lying.
80 posted on 03/13/2004 4:39:26 PM PST by SunkenCiv (...and the next step in the US -- two new Senators for Massachusetts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson