Skip to comments.
California Supreme Court Orders a Halt to Same Sex Marriages
FNC
Posted on 03/11/2004 2:29:41 PM PST by William McKinley
Fox news alert.
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: civilunion; fma; homosexual; homosexualagenda; marriage; prisoners; samesexmarriages; sf; stung; stunt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-127 next last
To: William McKinley
THANK GOD!
101
posted on
03/11/2004 4:40:02 PM PST
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: John Will
The Calif Supreme Court has 6 of 7 judges appointed by republican governor. I haven't followed them much, but are you confusing them with the 9th Circus Court of Appeals?
102
posted on
03/11/2004 5:02:20 PM PST
by
breakem
To: breakem
The semicolon judge was just a dirtbag federal trial court district judge. He was not on the 9th circuit court of appeals.
103
posted on
03/11/2004 6:56:50 PM PST
by
Torie
To: Torie
Thanx, I was just addressing the Cal Supremes
104
posted on
03/11/2004 6:59:06 PM PST
by
breakem
To: ambrose
".... respondents are directed to enforce and apply the provisions of Family Code sections 300, 301, 308.5, and 355 without regard to
respondents' personal view of the constitutionality of such provisions, and to refrain from issuing marriage licenses or certificates not authorized by such provisions"
Does the phrase bitch slapped come to mind?
;^>
105
posted on
03/11/2004 9:48:37 PM PST
by
TeleStraightShooter
(Kerry plans to apply post-Vietnam policy to Iraq: Skedaddle & let the Syrian Baathists take over)
Comment #106 Removed by Moderator
To: SF Republican
when I first moved here in '91 I registered at the voter registration drives on the street. The first three times I indicated I was a Republican and never received my registration. The 4th time I indicated Democrat and shazaam my card was in the mail. I'm a DINO. If you want to re-register, you should mail in your application form directly to the county registrar's office. Don't depend on the GOTV people to mail the form for you.
107
posted on
03/11/2004 11:06:21 PM PST
by
heleny
To: BlessedByLiberty
blood tests are being wai
ved. Blood tests aren't required in California or in most other states to get a marriage license.
(What were they ever supposed to test for, anyway? HIV, family relationship, Rh factor compatibility, or something else?)
108
posted on
03/11/2004 11:12:51 PM PST
by
heleny
To: Prime Choice
If California no longer has left-wing kooks on its Supreme Court, how is it that challenges to California's anti-Second Amendment laws go nowhere in this judiciary? Answer me that. California doesn't have the RKBA in its state constitution. People are trying amend it; see here for news, and get a petition to circulate if you're in CA:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1095239/posts
109
posted on
03/11/2004 11:18:27 PM PST
by
heleny
To: heleny
California doesn't have the RKBA in its state constitution. Doesn't matter. The states cannot usurp the Constitution of the United States of America.
110
posted on
03/11/2004 11:24:40 PM PST
by
Prime Choice
(Hm? No, my powers can only be used for Good.)
To: heleny
Sorry, fumble-fingered my reply (meant to preview, not post).
Anyway, I also wanted to thank you for the link. I just checked it out and will definitely be throwing my support to the cause!
111
posted on
03/11/2004 11:26:39 PM PST
by
Prime Choice
(Hm? No, my powers can only be used for Good.)
To: Prime Choice
Could you please post the "Village People - Kalifornia Supreme Court" graphic that ambrose mentioned? That sounds interesting.
To: Lancey Howard
Could you please post the "Village People - Kalifornia Supreme Court" graphic that ambrose mentioned? That sounds interesting. Ask and ye shall receive...
This was originally released on February 21st.
113
posted on
03/12/2004 12:26:29 AM PST
by
Prime Choice
(Hm? No, my powers can only be used for Good.)
To: Prime Choice
Thanks!
That's funny!
I always pictured these gutless mice as jack-in-the-box clowns. I find it incredible that the Kalifornia Supreme Court didn't simply say, "What are you bothering us with this nonsense for? The law says that marriage is between a man and a woman. That's the law so if it's not between a man and a woman, then it's not a lawful marriage. Freakin' duh. Now get outta here."
No. Instead these worms gotta think about it for awhile and "rule" in a couple of months.
Unbelievable.
Comment #115 Removed by Moderator
Brief history of gay (same-sex) marriages:
-----------------
1989: Denmark was the first country to grant civil partnership to gay couples.
-----------------
09/00: Dutch legalize same-sex marriages.
01/03: Belgium begins to grant marriage licenses to same-sex couples.
06/10/03: Ontario (Canada) begins to issue same-sex marriage licenses in the province.
07/08/03: British Columbia (Canada) begins to issue same-sex marriage licenses.
11/03: MA Supreme Court orders MA to issue same-sex marriages licenses from 05/17/04.
02/12/04: SF County, CA begins to issue same-sex marriage licenses.
02/20/04: NM County issues same-sex marriage licenses for one day.
02/20/04 (P.M): NM AG rules same-sex marriages are illegal under NM laws.
02/27/04: New Paltz, NY Mayor begins to perform same-sex marriage ceremonies.
03/03/04: NY AG rules same-sex marriages are illegal under NY laws.
03/03/04: Multnomah County (Portland), OR begins to issue same-sex marriage licenses.
03/05/04: NY Judge bars New Paltz Mayor from performing same-sex marriages for a month.
03/06/04: Same-sex marriage ceremonies continue in New Paltz, now under Unitarian Pastor.
03/07/04: Seattle, WA mayor to recognize gay marriages from other places.
03/08/04: Asbury Park, NJ Deputy Mayor issues marriage license to a gay couple.
03/09/04: NJ AG demands an halt to same-sex marriages or face criminal charges.
03/09/04: SJ, CA to recognize same-sex marriages performed elsewhere for it's city workers.
03/11/04: SF County,CA halts issuing same-sex marriage licenses per order of CA Supreme Court.
Which country/state/county will be next?
116
posted on
03/12/2004 4:04:58 AM PST
by
KQQL
(@)
To: cameronsmom
I wonder if Rosie was ever pissed that she and her girl had to fly all the way out to California, when the City of New Paltz in upstate NY was hooking up lesbos there... Something I've wondered, doesn't California have any residency requirements for marriage? Or did Newsom just figure that as long as they're breaking one law, why not two?
To: William McKinley
Read at NRO/Corner a suggestion (tongue-in-cheek) to put a temporary moratorium on ALL marriages until the matter gets sorted out. I think it is quite a brilliant suggestion and would very swiftly settle many matters in one blow. Including knuckle-rapping the legislative and judicial bodies proposing such a "moratorium". The idea has started my day out beautifully! :)
118
posted on
03/12/2004 8:16:33 AM PST
by
Alia
(California -- It's Groovy! Baby!)
To: Constructionist
State officials such as Mayor Gavin Newsom and State Legislator Jackie Goldberg are supposed to "lead by example
Add Migden to that ...as controller of the CA Board of Equalization she should be in her office tending to the peoples business...not performing illegal marriage ceremonies ....did she take a leave of absense............?
119
posted on
03/12/2004 8:32:02 AM PST
by
spokeshave
(Recall Bill Lockyer)
To: William McKinley
Peter Ilgenfritz and Dave Shull, pastors at
University Congregational Church in Seattle,
are among six couples that filed suit after
being denied a marriage license.
120
posted on
03/12/2004 10:55:37 AM PST
by
ppaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-127 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson