Skip to comments.
The Bible and Homosexuality
WND.com ^
| 03-11-04
| Farah, Joseph
Posted on 03/11/2004 5:53:16 AM PST by Theodore R.
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
To: WKB
Yes indeed - "Lightnin' WKB"!
To: Theodore R.
Sounds like Ketchup Boy has been attending the Howard Brush Dean School of Theology.
22
posted on
03/11/2004 6:30:48 AM PST
by
GulliverSwift
(Keep the <a href="http://www.johnkerry.com/">gigolo</a> out of the White House!)
To: Agnes Heep
Receiving in themselves that recompence of their error." Sounds a lot like HIV.
The NIV says it this way.
Rom. 1:27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion.
23
posted on
03/11/2004 6:35:44 AM PST
by
WKB
(3!~ Term Limits: Because politicians are like diapers., need to be changed for the same reason.)
To: trebb
Some gays are convinced there's " a story in the Bible about two women who marry each other." No, I am not making that up. They have a garbled memory of the Naomi-Ruth story : Because the "Whither thou goest..." speech has been recited at some marriage ceremonies, they think that it's ALWAY'S been used to "ratify" a sexual bond...Ergo, Naomi and Ruth marry each other. In actuality, of course, sex between inlaws is also forbidden in the Bible; the Bible specifies between a daughter-in-law and father-in-law, but there's no reason to doubt that DIL/MIL sex would be considered as much as an abomination-and of course, they totally miss that one of the "women who marry each other" is married to a man a few chapters later.
24
posted on
03/11/2004 7:03:58 AM PST
by
kaylar
To: little jeremiah
25
posted on
03/11/2004 7:07:31 AM PST
by
EdReform
(Support Free Republic - All donations are greatly appreciated. Thank you for your support!)
To: chatham
Well, millions of women have died in childbirth, too.
Is that a statement?
26
posted on
03/11/2004 7:18:06 AM PST
by
John H K
To: *Homosexual Agenda; EdReform; scripter; GrandMoM; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping - Hmmm, there's clauses in the Bible that "go both ways" - ????
I guess he means that some places in the Bible say that people who perform same sex sodomy should be killed, and other places don't say they should be killed.
Let me know if anyone wants on/off this pinglist.
27
posted on
03/11/2004 8:06:45 AM PST
by
little jeremiah
(...men of intemperate minds can not be free. Their passions forge their fetters.)
To: familyofman
The traditional scriptures of Hinduism also state that same sex acts are an abomination and offense and should be punished severely.
28
posted on
03/11/2004 8:09:21 AM PST
by
little jeremiah
(...men of intemperate minds can not be free. Their passions forge their fetters.)
To: Theodore R.
Then, in the New Testament, Paul writes in Romans 1:22-27: Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things. Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
"Vile Affections" are a curse...upon those who have changed the word of God into a lie....who worship the creature more than the creator...(not just instead of the Creator...)
Homosexuality is a "Vile Affection"...and a curse from God...who has given them over to reprobate minds...which of course the homosexuals are trying to argue are "normal affections" Their goal is not to have the curse lifted from their lives...but to change the moral constitution of a nation...to turn it upside down and backwards in order to rationalize justify and normalize the "Vile Affections" God has cursed them with...
They want God to change His nature...and since He wont....they want to change society make it over in their own image...and man as well....
29
posted on
03/11/2004 8:25:09 AM PST
by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
To: Theodore R.
AMEN!!!
To: stranger and pilgrim
Judging is not a sin, telling someone one something is a sin (Judging) is not a sin. Jesus made judgments all the time and he was without sin! The early saints also made judgments, we are made in the image of God who is the supreme judge.
Unrighteous judgment is a sin! as us unrighteous hatred. What do you do with a group who not only sins (there business) but thinks its OK (their business) and want me to think it ok (my business) and will teach it in the schools (our business) to do so?
31
posted on
03/11/2004 8:29:04 AM PST
by
N3WBI3
To: Theodore R.
32
posted on
03/11/2004 8:39:52 AM PST
by
scripter
(Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
To: WKB
Thanks for the ping.
Kerry should stick to topics with which he's familiar.
The Bible and Mississippi are not two of those.
33
posted on
03/11/2004 10:07:52 AM PST
by
dixiechick2000
(President Bush is a mensch in cowboy boots.)
To: stranger and pilgrim
Yes. Homosexuality is a sin. So is judging. So is hatred. God judges. God hates. God does not sin.
To: stranger and pilgrim
Oh, so I guess we should be welcoming and accepting to everyone's devices, desires, and sick behavior. Should we not speak and defend God's laws? Or just sit back and be afraid to confront disgusting behavior?
Living in 2004, no holes barred.
35
posted on
03/11/2004 12:53:31 PM PST
by
New Perspective
(Proud father of a 2 month old son with Down's)
To: stranger and pilgrim
Oh, so I guess we should be welcoming and accepting to everyone's devices, desires, and sick behavior. Should we not speak and defend God's laws? Or just sit back and be afraid to confront disgusting behavior?
Living in 2004, no holes barred.
36
posted on
03/11/2004 12:54:23 PM PST
by
New Perspective
(Proud father of a 2 month old son with Down's)
To: John H K
Yes it is . But they died from complications of childbirth.
Homosexuals could avoid their own death by making better choices in their lives.
37
posted on
03/11/2004 2:09:35 PM PST
by
chatham
To: John H K
Yes it is . But they died from complications of childbirth.
Homosexuals could avoid their own death by making better choices in their lives.
38
posted on
03/11/2004 2:09:36 PM PST
by
chatham
To: Theodore R.
Ping for enlightenment.
To: nonsporting
"God judges. God hates. God does not sin."
Seems like he is best qualified for the job.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson