Skip to comments.
Marcus Dixon CONVICTED Ten Years for Child Molestation
Posted on 03/01/2004 1:03:56 PM PST by cyborg
I just heard that Marcus Dixon has been convicted of child molestation. Ten years in prison...a complete outrage esp. since the girl said she lied anout the rape.
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News
KEYWORDS: 15willgetyou20; ageofconsent; ageofconsentlaws; childmolestor; culturewar; itsjustsex; jailbait; marcusdixon; permissivesociety; promiscuity; sexualizingchildren; sexualmolestation; statutoryrape; tooyoungtoconsent
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 141-158 next last
To: cyborg
I think it's sad.Oh, it sucks. I spent two months in stir, and ALL the charges were DROPPED OUTRIGHT....
Two months wasted!
81
posted on
03/01/2004 3:28:12 PM PST
by
Lazamataz
(Dangerously is the Sahara dust.)
To: discostu
So do I understand you correctly that a 16 year old boy can sleep with a 14 year old girl for two years, but then he turns 18 so it becomes illegal, she's still 16. But then two years after that, he's 20 and she turns 18, so it's legal again for one year, they're both in the gap, but then he turns 21 and she's 19, so it becomes illegal again, until she turns 21 two years after that? Is that correct?
82
posted on
03/01/2004 3:31:03 PM PST
by
coloradan
(Hence, etc.)
To: cyborg
It doesn't strike me as the least bit odd. I would avoid such a scenario like the plague. My life isn't for public consumption or entertainment, and I wouldn't want my minor child to be exposed to more publicity and scrutiny than she'd already been through.
To: coloradan
That's about the jist of it (at least as I understand it, I could be wrong, I have been before). Statutory rape (even in states that don't have a silly buffer zone) requires one person to be over the line and the other below. From a legal perspective two kids under the age are just being stupid, but one person over the age can apply pressure on someone under the age and make them consent to things they don't understand. Probably the wierdest sets of laws in the books. Not that they're entirely bad, there should be some concept of age proofing consent to keep the extreme situations punishable, but when you look at it in cases where the two parties are close in age it begins to seem a little odd.
84
posted on
03/01/2004 3:37:03 PM PST
by
discostu
(but this one has 11)
To: hellinahandcart
Okay fair enough.
85
posted on
03/01/2004 3:37:45 PM PST
by
cyborg
To: bondjamesbond
That is exactly what pedophiles want to do -- they want to keep pushing the age step by step lower and lower. Dixon had it coming, should have been punished earlier. Let them pick on girls their own age.
86
posted on
03/01/2004 3:38:02 PM PST
by
Dante3
To: cyborg
I think possibly the lawyer didn't want them on the show because they have a big lawsuit against the school because they didn't report the previous sexual misconduct of Dixon to police or something like that.
To: cyborg
Think about it. Why should the truth of your case depend on how well you perform before a live studio audience?
Some of us aren't good at it. Some of us KNOW we aren't good at it and know we wouldn't serve ourselves well by running in front of a camera.
To: cyborg
Somehow I don't think teens in high school are aware of this law in these sexualized times. As the homosexuals are already showing them, laws don't matter. Law is dead. Do as thou will.
89
posted on
03/01/2004 4:01:12 PM PST
by
weegee
(Election 2004: Re-elect President Bush... Don't feed the trolls.)
To: weegee
I agree wholeheartedly. It wasn't a coincidence that the outright pride in performing oral sex happened after Bill Clinton. Pretty sad.
90
posted on
03/01/2004 4:04:15 PM PST
by
cyborg
To: cyborg; Lazamataz; rdb3
Miss VC has relatives that live in that area, Rome, Ga. I've heard alot about this case and here is my take:
Mr. Dixon had a scholorship to Vanderbilt, which is not a prototypical southern football school in that people actually have to have grades to attend.
Vanderbilt ain't FSU or Miami. I've seen players turned down by Vanderbilt for minor stuff. Mr. Dixon was very clean to be accepted.
I have no doubt in my mind that the sex between Dixon and the minor was consensual, and the sentence was way too harsh.
Cold blooded murderers have gotten less.(Carolina Panther Fred Lane's wife got 8 years for murdering him in cold blood.)
From what I've heard, the only reason the girl claimed that Dixon raped her was she was because of her parents.
I've got a 15 year old daughter, and if she was the girl in this case, I still wouldn't think the sentence was justified.
To: Vigilantcitizen
From what I've heard, the only reason the girl claimed that Dixon raped her was she was because of her parents.
**That's what I'm hearing from a lot of people who live there.
92
posted on
03/01/2004 4:35:32 PM PST
by
cyborg
To: Rifleman
Yep, and in 1859 I suppose that you would have reported those escaped slaves to the slave catchers, because the law is the law. Now you're being silly. First off, there's slim chance you could convince anyone that slavery is moral. Secondly, there are reasons (teleological and deontological) why having sex with children is illegal.
*sigh* Once again, instead of handling the issue in a reasoned manner, jackwits like yourself have to start throwing mud and jumping to conclusions.
Let me know when you have something worthwhile to contribute.
93
posted on
03/01/2004 4:40:38 PM PST
by
Prime Choice
(I'm pro-choice. I just think the "choice" should be made *before* having sex.)
To: Vigilantcitizen
Vanderbilt ain't FSU or Miami. I've seen players turned down by Vanderbilt for minor stuff. Mr. Dixon was very clean to be accepted. I've heard. Rice University is like that here in Texas. Baylor, well, nevermind.
From what I've heard, the only reason the girl claimed that Dixon raped her was she was because of her parents.
A point where many here simply refuse to even entertain for a moment.
![](http://mars.walagata.com/w/mrswing/__hr_rdb3.jpg)
94
posted on
03/01/2004 5:05:08 PM PST
by
rdb3
(Don`t be afraid doing tasks you`re not familiar with. Remember, Noah's ark was built by an amateur.)
To: BlueNgold
Thank you for cutting through the smoke and mirrors of "I feel ...." and getting down to the facts. My kudos for focusing on the simple questions like: how do you know what you just posted is true? What are your sources?, etc.
95
posted on
03/01/2004 5:08:34 PM PST
by
Col Freeper
(Life is not a dress rehearsal, share every day with your loved ones as if it was your last.)
To: Prime Choice
Now you're being silly. First off, there's slim chance you could convince anyone that slavery is moral.In those times it would have been really simple to do that.
![](http://mars.walagata.com/w/mrswing/__hr_rdb3.jpg)
96
posted on
03/01/2004 5:09:44 PM PST
by
rdb3
(Don`t be afraid doing tasks you`re not familiar with. Remember, Noah's ark was built by an amateur.)
To: Prime Choice
I believe the statute in NYC does not hold men accountable for sex with another teenager if they are 18-20.
97
posted on
03/01/2004 5:44:11 PM PST
by
rmlew
(Peaceniks and isolationists are objectively pro-Terrorist)
To: Dante3
To an 18 year old, a girl of 15 years 9 months is a woman.
98
posted on
03/01/2004 5:45:11 PM PST
by
rmlew
(Peaceniks and isolationists are objectively pro-Terrorist)
To: Prime Choice
Mud throwing? Jumping to conclusions? Are we projecting a bit this evening, infant?
And a fifteen year old is not a child. Through most of history, she would be married and might have a child or two. There are many reasons that a family and a society would want to prevent this liason,and protect the chastity (or at least the marrigability) of young women. The fact is that we don't do so with any consistancy and sending this guy to prison for ten years is stupid and evil and even unfair.
And the day that I ask your permission (or anyone's) to express my opinion is the day that Lucifer buys ice skates.
99
posted on
03/01/2004 5:50:00 PM PST
by
Rifleman
To: rmlew
He is old enough to know that she is a minor. There are plenty of women his age and older -- there is no excuse to go after children and ruin their childhood. He is sexual predator and needs to be locked up.
100
posted on
03/01/2004 5:50:06 PM PST
by
Dante3
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 141-158 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson