Skip to comments.
Senator Hillary! Women better off with Saddam - Transcript (long, know thy enemy)
Brookings Institution ^
| 2-27-04
Posted on 02/27/2004 7:30:51 PM PST by Indy Pendance
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
To: Indy Pendance; All
41
posted on
02/28/2004 12:58:23 AM PST
by
backhoe
(The 1990's? The Decade of Fraud(s)... the 00's? The Decade of Lunatics...)
Awwww Hillary put a SOCK in it ! Ya Big Itch ! Gheeeeesh what trash .........
42
posted on
02/28/2004 1:56:07 AM PST
by
Squantos
(Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet.)
To: Spotsy
Hillary has been getting a pass all these years, IMO, because she is for abortion and her husband is/was powerful. Quite a stance for feminism isn't she.
43
posted on
02/28/2004 4:00:34 AM PST
by
Thebaddog
(Woof this!)
To: Indy Pendance
As a staff alumnus of the Armed Services Committee, I'm particularly thrilled that the Senator chose as one of her assignments when she joined the United States Senate to serve on the United States Senate Armed Services Committee. I understand Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) told Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-LA)(after her close re-election bid) to move over, she'd be sitting on the Armed Services Committee. This after Bill made some calls in LA to get out the vote for Landrieu.
To: Indy Pendance
I think Iraq would be better off with Hillary running it and her living there for the rest of her life.
45
posted on
02/28/2004 5:05:26 AM PST
by
b4its2late
(A thing not worth doing isn't worth doing well.)
To: Indy Pendance
The woman, and I use that term in broadest sense of the word, is clearly delusional.
46
posted on
02/28/2004 6:33:24 AM PST
by
Jemian
To: Indy Pendance
"We also have to do more on women's rights and roles. And I have been deeply troubled by what I hear coming out of Iraq. When I was there and met with women members of the governing councils and local--of the national governing councils and local governing councils in Baghdad and Kirkuk, they were starting to express concerns about some of the pullbacks in the rights that they were given under Saddam Hussein. He was an equal opportunity oppressor, but on paper women had rights; they went to school; they participated in the professions; they participated in government;..."...they were abducted, they were raped, they were beaten, they were tortured...
47
posted on
02/28/2004 6:46:57 AM PST
by
Dan Middleton
(Blue Jackets come from behind to defeat Chicago, 4-3)
To: Indy Pendance
And yet the mindless dem's, (who don't bother to watch the evening news,) Will march to the voting booth in November and pull that dem lever. WHY? Because thats the way my daddy voted. Yellow dog idiots!
To: Indy Pendance
We've got to target the most dangerous weapons that will do us the most damage. The chemical, biological and radiological devices. Yes, we have to target those CT scanners!
This speech is simply awful. It meanders across a laundry list of complaints about the Bush Administration complete with back-handed swipes. It has no focus, no positive forward looking message; it, you know, falters, you know, at the end. It sounds like a Howard Dean stump speech. I think we have less to fear from this woman than we think we do. Madeline Albright and Geraldine Ferraro could do better.
49
posted on
02/28/2004 7:21:37 AM PST
by
Nebullis
To: sport
She and the other democrats funnel all that information to our enemies, their allies , as soon as they get it.
They pass it on so fast that it is almost in real time.
I wouldn't be so sure. The Clinton's have already demonstrated they are enemies to "the state". I would imagine they're being looked at and monitored VERY closely.... At least I hope that's the case.
To: Thebaddog
Hillary has been getting a pass all these years, IMO, because she is for abortion and her husband is/was powerful. Quite a stance for feminism isn't she
Don't forget the main reason she's gotten a pass all these years is because she's got THE FBI FILES OF ANYONE AND EVERYONE WITH ANY KIND OF POWER (politicians and media)! She also used the IRS to audit her enemies. They became her "SS", aka her jack booted thugs.
To: Indy Pendance
bttt
52
posted on
02/28/2004 9:10:24 AM PST
by
machman
To: Indy Pendance; Mudboy Slim; MeekOneGOP; sultan88
What an EVIL,EVIL (wo-man.)
Hilda-beast ping
53
posted on
02/28/2004 9:20:58 AM PST
by
FBD
(...Please press 2 for English...for Espanol, please stay on the line...)
To: FBD
Senator Hillary: Women better off with Saddam
54
posted on
02/28/2004 9:25:46 AM PST
by
MeekOneGOP
(The Democrats believe in CHOICE. I have chosen to vote STRAIGHT TICKET GOP for years !!)
To: AgThorn
I'm no fan of Hitlery, but what she says (you have in red) is accurate. If the religous islamists take control of the elections, Iraqi womens rights may be less than what they had under Sadam which would be a sad testimony for our 'investment' over there.Well, it's a good thing the Bush administration already is aware of that, no thanks to the likes of Hillary. They're dealing with it without her interference. More like trying to hitch her wagon to the policy so she can claim some kind of credit for the newly formed government and claim she helped influence the administration in the right direction.
And let's not be coy, she does say they had rights under Saddam, as long as they stayed out of his way.
Ludicrous.
55
posted on
02/28/2004 9:38:54 AM PST
by
cyncooper
("Maybe they were hoping he'd lose the next Iraqi election")
To: FairOpinion
Hillary also seems to think the Afghan women were better off under the Taliban! >> no fan of Hillary but Saddam'regime was no Taliban. In Afghanistan - before the Taliban/Mujaheddin took power - the Soviet puppet Najibullah allowed women to roam the Kabul streets in shorts. Najibullah was a tyrant alright - but like Saddam - was sort of secular and believer in keeping Islam out of business of running the country. But then the US supported the Islamists to come to power in Kabul ( OK - the original ones were not Taliban but Islamists all the same ) and the same bunch of guys later decided to fly a few large planes into tall buildings.
The real Taliban are the Shia leaders waiting to be "democratically" elected and covert Iraq into Iran. So we need to really watch out what is happening in Iraq - US may need to keep its troops there for the next 100 years.
56
posted on
02/28/2004 9:39:42 AM PST
by
anu_shr
To: Indy Pendance
57
posted on
02/28/2004 9:44:21 AM PST
by
doug from upland
(Don't wait until it is too late to stop Hillary -- do something today!)
To: Indy Pendance
He was an equal opportunity oppressor, but on paper women had rights; they went to school; they participated in the professions; they participated in government; and business and, as long as they stayed out of his way, they had considerable freedom of movement.
Classic!!!!
Reality matters not, as long as its on paper. Let's write ant-gun laws, and not enforce them. Then we can scream that we need more anti-gun laws.
How many times did her wife think he had fulfilled campaign promises simply because he had talked about them in speeches?
58
posted on
02/28/2004 9:50:49 AM PST
by
gitmo
(Who is John Galt?)
To: gitmo
So are we saying that women in Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia don't need to be liberated because they have more rights now than a democracy could give them?
And of course the women who were forced into Saddam's rape rooms are in greater danger now because now they can be raped by just anyone!
I'm sure the thousands of women who occupy Saddam's mass graves are grateful they didn't live to experience the oppression brought on by American liberation.
59
posted on
02/28/2004 10:33:34 AM PST
by
Jeff Gannon
(Listen to my radio show "Jeff Gannon's Washington" on www.RIGHTALK.com)
To: Jeff Gannon
In the process of printing her speech - my printer prints last to first page. the last page consisted of 8 lines excluding the Thank you very much.
there are 4, yes four, of her "you know" 's. in just eight lines.
That said - this person is so very dangerous to the whole world and must be taken seriously. Forget her black suit, her big hips, her greasy hair, her empty smile, her blank eyes, her monotone voice.
Her agenda is what is seriously dangerous. The news media is what is seriously dangerous.
They must be taken seriously!!!!!
60
posted on
02/28/2004 1:42:32 PM PST
by
malia
(BUSH & CHENEY 2004)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson