To: Indy Pendance
He was an equal opportunity oppressor, but on paper women had rights; they went to school; they participated in the professions; they participated in government; and business and, as long as they stayed out of his way, they had considerable freedom of movement.
Classic!!!!
Reality matters not, as long as its on paper. Let's write ant-gun laws, and not enforce them. Then we can scream that we need more anti-gun laws.
How many times did her wife think he had fulfilled campaign promises simply because he had talked about them in speeches?
58 posted on
02/28/2004 9:50:49 AM PST by
gitmo
(Who is John Galt?)
To: gitmo
So are we saying that women in Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia don't need to be liberated because they have more rights now than a democracy could give them?
And of course the women who were forced into Saddam's rape rooms are in greater danger now because now they can be raped by just anyone!
I'm sure the thousands of women who occupy Saddam's mass graves are grateful they didn't live to experience the oppression brought on by American liberation.
59 posted on
02/28/2004 10:33:34 AM PST by
Jeff Gannon
(Listen to my radio show "Jeff Gannon's Washington" on www.RIGHTALK.com)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson