Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
To: William McKinley
What a surprise.
2 posted on
02/27/2004 4:55:59 PM PST by
45Auto
(Big holes are (almost) always better.)
To: William McKinley
That's it? No further comment?
Anarchy.
4 posted on
02/27/2004 4:56:20 PM PST by
King Black Robe
(With freedom of religion and speech now abridged, it is time to go after the press.)
To: William McKinley
Laws are for the little people and Republicans. Laws don't apply to democrats, lawyers, the homosexual mafia, and other sociopaths.
5 posted on
02/27/2004 4:56:51 PM PST by
FormerACLUmember
(Man rises to greatness if greatness is expected of him)
To: William McKinley
6 posted on
02/27/2004 4:57:07 PM PST by
Peach
(The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: William McKinley
Evidently, they can't read either.
7 posted on
02/27/2004 4:57:50 PM PST by
jwalsh07
To: William McKinley
THIS is another very important reason to re-elect George Bush, and sends lot of Republicans to Congress, so he can appoint conservative judges, who follow the law.
"It's the judges, stupid!"
8 posted on
02/27/2004 4:59:07 PM PST by
FairOpinion
("America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our country." --- G. W. Bush)
To: William McKinley
Chalk another one up to judicial bias...
9 posted on
02/27/2004 4:59:09 PM PST by
Prime Choice
(I'm pro-choice. I just think the "choice" should be made *before* having sex.)
To: William McKinley
I hate to tell you true California conservatives this, but if you think your state isn't beyond redemption, you're kidding yourselves.
10 posted on
02/27/2004 4:59:34 PM PST by
Viking2002
(I think; therefore, I Freep............)
To: William McKinley
They refused the Attorney General's request that they issue an injunction preventing further gay marriages to be conducted in San Francisco.
The AG made a mistake. He put the legal ball into the court's hands. What the mayor of S.F. is doing is illegal. The AG should then have initiated legal proceedings against the mayor. As it was, he passed the buck to the court.
11 posted on
02/27/2004 4:59:52 PM PST by
aruanan
To: William McKinley
12 posted on
02/27/2004 5:00:16 PM PST by
ambrose
("John Kerry has blood of American soldiers on his hands" - Lt. Col. Oliver North)
To: William McKinley
Since when does the JUDICIARY have ANYTHING at all to do with LAW ENFORCEMENT? What the hell is going on in California? Has everything I have ever learned about our Branches of Governmnet just been changed or is this just plain anarchy?
13 posted on
02/27/2004 5:01:00 PM PST by
PISANO
(Our troops...... will NOT tire...will NOT falter.....and WILL NOT FAIL!!!)
To: William McKinley
While infuriating, it is probably in the long run going to ironically be for the best. This will quickly illustrate to the American people, even the ones who don't pay attention, how easily our legislature and the will of the people is being overridden by a defacto judicial coup. Were this to be nipped in the bud by the high courts, most would just assume that the system once again in the end worked as designed.
It usually takes a big train wreck for the US population to react to a major deficiency.
To: William McKinley
If there's anything the Beltway Republicans hate, it's a sudden inopportune eruption of states' rights. First it was drug importation, now gay marriage.
To: William McKinley
CA Supreme 'ACLU' Refuses To Block Gag Marriages?
19 posted on
02/27/2004 5:03:25 PM PST by
maestro
To: William McKinley
I can just see ol' Bill (I Hate Your Guns) Lockyear up in front of the Cal SC:
"Well, you see, the damn new Governator sent me here to argue that maybe, just maybe, maggot marriage is illegal under current California law, and I, I, just don't see what harm there is in it, and I, I, I guess I'm asking you pretty please, to maybe, if you could see your clear, to maybe issue an injunction to stop any further so-called marriages so that if you later can hear the whole story you'll probably agree to save my @ss so I can run for Gov. After all, some of my best friends are faggots, and I will probably need their support for my ascension to the governor's throne, er, orfice, er, office."
26 posted on
02/27/2004 5:07:46 PM PST by
45Auto
(Big holes are (almost) always better.)
To: William McKinley
"The rights afforded by California's Constitution clearly trump laws restricting marriage to opposite-sex couples," City Attorney Dennis Herrera said at a Feb. 19 City Hall press conference. "With our cross-complaint today, San Francisco seeks an unequivocal declaration from the court that state provisions banning same-sex marriage are unconstitutional."
http://www.ci.sf.ca.us/site/cityattorney_index.asp?id=45531 posted on
02/27/2004 5:10:29 PM PST by
kcvl
To: William McKinley
You have to be kidding me right? NO I guess liberals just love to trash our society to oblivion. What has been written for biblical times is being trashed without a thought of consequences this will have. Rosie O’Donnell is making fun of our laws so are judges. My wife was so pissed off when she saw that I have never ever heard her coursing so much. What irks me Fox News was publishing this as a normal event.
To: William McKinley
I can't help but wonder what the result would be if "pistol" license was substituted for "marriage" license.
33 posted on
02/27/2004 5:10:40 PM PST by
dmcnash
(Actually I don't wonder at all)
To: William McKinley
34 posted on
02/27/2004 5:11:07 PM PST by
Recovering_Democrat
(I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
To: William McKinley
Did you really think that they would issue an injunction?
36 posted on
02/27/2004 5:13:23 PM PST by
sport
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
