Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BETTER THAN CLINTON
NATIONAL REVIEW ON LINE ^ | 2/26/2004 | J EDWARD CARTER

Posted on 02/26/2004 8:51:39 AM PST by HJH207

February 26, 2004, 8:52 a.m. Better than Clinton? Putting Bush's economic record to the reelection test.

By J. Edward Carter

Nine months prior to the 1996 presidential election, Bill Clinton's Council of Economic Advisers cheerfully reported that the "American economy has performed exceptionally well over the past 3 years." While that may not surprise you, you may however be surprised to learn that President George W. Bush's economic record is, in many ways, better than the record Clinton ran on for reelection.

Compared with the "exceptional" years of 1993, 1994, and 1995, the first three years of George W. Bush's presidency featured:

lower inflation lower unemployment faster productivity growth faster labor compensation growth (i.e., wages and benefits) 29.4 percent ($6.9 trillion) more economic output 45 percent ($960 billion) more exports; and an economic growth rate 81.2 percent as fast as that under Clinton

Considering the circumstances under which the U.S. economy has labored for the past few years, President Bush's record is all the more impressive. When George W. Bush moved into the White House, the economy was on the verge of recession. The largest stock market bubble in U.S. history had recently burst, exports were declining, manufacturing employment had been falling for half a year, and people were finding it harder and harder to find work. And that was before 9/11, the war on terror, and the revelations of the corporate-governance scandals that grew out of the late 1990s.

The tax cuts President Bush signed into law helped alleviate the impact of these economic shocks and kept millions of Americans working who would have otherwise lost their jobs. Consequently, the unemployment rate peaked in June 2003 at 6.3 percent, compared with peaks of 7.8 percent and 10.8 percent during the previous two recessions.

With the U.S. economy on the upswing, President Bush's critics are finding it increasingly difficult to disparage his economic record. But that won't stop them. Fortunately, as Aldous Huxley observed, "Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored." So what are the facts?

Most private-sector forecasters expect the U.S. economy will grow faster this year (on an average annual basis) than in any year since 1984.

For the third consecutive year, the U.S. economy is poised to grow faster than most other industrialized economies. France, Germany, and Japan, for instance, are not expected to grow even half as fast as the United States.

Since the Bush administration began, non-farm productivity has increased at a 4.1 percent annual rate — the fastest pace for the start of any presidency since Harry S. Truman occupied the White House.

The U.S. remains the world's largest exporter. In fact, during the first three years of the Bush administration, the U.S. exported more in real terms than it did during the Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon, and Ford administrations combined.

More single-family homes were sold in 2003 than in any other year on record. And the homeownership rate is at a record-high of 68.5 percent — a full percentage point higher than during the fourth quarter of 2000.

At 5.6 percent, the national unemployment rate is now lower than the average unemployment rate of the 1970s, 1980s, and the 1990s.

According to the Labor Department's household survey — the survey used to calculate the monthly unemployment rate — more Americans are working now than ever before. The payroll survey is also showing improvement: 112,000 new jobs were created in January and 366,000 jobs have been added over the last five months.

While President Bush's economic record is arguably better than the record Bill Clinton ran on in 1996, this truth is frequently obscured by unrelenting partisan criticism based more on fancy than fact. But the fact remains that the United States boasts the world's largest and most vibrant economy. It will stay that way so long as we are guided by a trust in what President Bush calls "the power and possibilities of freedom."


TOPICS: Announcements; Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; bush; bushrecovery; economy; impeachedx42; thebusheconomy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: HJH207
'But the fact remains that the United States boasts the world's largest and most vibrant economy. It will stay that way so long as we are guided by a trust in what President Bush calls "the power and possibilities of freedom."'

BUMP!

41 posted on 02/26/2004 5:25:31 PM PST by windchime (Podesta about Bush: "He's got four years to try to undo all the stuff we've done." (TIME-1/22/01))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HJH207
Darn, I wish that President Bush wasn't so humble. Braggadocio Clinton never let us forget he was working so hard all the time, and actually had people believing he was doin' somethin' about things. It's just that those things never got done and President Bush was left with one hell of big mess.

Just shows how little regard mainstream press folks have for people that are the doers. Always raging and hyping on about the losers.

42 posted on 02/27/2004 8:05:57 PM PST by harpo11 (Give 'em Hell Team Bush! The Right Didn't Start the Fire! We're Fightin' to Put It Out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HJH207
Haha, now when we are asked why we like Bush more than Clinton, we can answer: "It's the economy stupid!"
43 posted on 02/29/2004 12:42:01 PM PST by anonymous86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HJH207
Thanks for this article.

Ping for reference!

TS

44 posted on 02/29/2004 12:43:18 PM PST by The Shrew (RightTalk - The New NPR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HJH207
This is a good AD !


45 posted on 02/29/2004 12:49:24 PM PST by america-rules (It's US or THEM so what part don't you understand ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HJH207
Wow, I hate Billy Chrystal. He needs to read that article and graph and see if he still considers our economy to be "tanking." He should be one of the people out on the streets, thrown to the compassion of those around him.

Now he's talking in a different language like an idiot. What a megalomaniac. He's almost as bad as Michael Moore (but not quite).
46 posted on 02/29/2004 6:03:31 PM PST by anonymous86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HJH207; ValerieUSA
With the U.S. economy on the upswing, President Bush's critics are finding it increasingly difficult to disparage his economic record.
Except in Hollywood. ;')

The French, meanwhile, get to enjoy the downturn in tourism business the US sent their way.

In this context, the difference between Clinton and GWB is that the former inherited an economy already on the upswing, while the latter inherited one on the way down.
47 posted on 02/29/2004 6:50:13 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Drill the ANWR! Overthrow Chavez in Venezuela! Develop oil sands in Alberta Canada!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson