Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

College relents on speech policy
Washington Times ^ | 2/26/04 | Joyce Howard Price

Posted on 02/25/2004 9:55:56 PM PST by kattracks

Edited on 07/12/2004 4:13:32 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

A Pennsylvania college has revised a portion of its student-speech policy that critics said violated free speech and was at the center of a federal lawsuit filed by current and former students.

The Shippensburg University's Council of Trustees changed some wording in its Student Code of Conduct two weeks ago after a federal judge issued a preliminary injunction barring enforcement of some provisions.


(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: academia; freespeech; highereducation; shippensburg; shippensburgu; speechcodes

1 posted on 02/25/2004 9:55:56 PM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
No, we can't have fliers that would hurt Ossama's feelings.

They could have just un-recognized all the Republican and conservative groups on campus like some colleges....

2 posted on 02/25/2004 10:05:03 PM PST by GeronL (http://www.ArmorforCongress.com......................Send a Freeper to Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
INTREP - EDUCATION - FREEDOM OF SPEECH
3 posted on 02/25/2004 10:15:49 PM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
As for the dispute over the anti-bin Laden fliers, Mr. Gigliotti said yesterday in an interview that if Mr. Bair was ordered to remove them, it was only because "We don't allow any paper on the doors, because paper is inflammable."

It's late, and I'm sleepy, but shouldn't the word be "flammable"? And this is a college?

4 posted on 02/25/2004 10:43:24 PM PST by Tuscaloosa Goldfinch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tuscaloosa Goldfinch
Oddly enough the dictionaries I've seen agree that the English common tongue has managed to arrive at the same meaning for both flammable and inflammable. I have the same reaction to the word, however. Why don't we just get rid of 'inflammable,' if it doesn't mean anything?

"Irregardless," however, is another story...I'm not giving up that fight.
5 posted on 02/26/2004 1:09:29 AM PST by LibertarianInExile (What will we do with the drunken sailor? Depends--is the drunken sailor an affirmative action hire?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile
"irregardless" LOL!!!
6 posted on 02/26/2004 9:01:39 AM PST by Tuscaloosa Goldfinch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson