Skip to comments.
High Court: OK to Deny Aid to Divinity Students
Fox News ^
| 02/25/04
| AP
Posted on 02/25/2004 9:48:32 AM PST by Modernman
Edited on 04/22/2004 12:39:04 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
WASHINGTON
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Philosophy; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: churchandstate; divinity; joshuadavey; lawsuit; lockevdavey; religion; scholarship; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-171 last
To: BibChr
Just because it doesn't make any living sense, doesn't mean you didn't try to make the connection. That was exactly my point. Why else would you equate a medical student with a divinity student ???? Keep in mind I am one of said students and I believe I know what I'm talking about when I say the court's decision was CORRECT. Perhaps you should come up with a different analogy - one that's not so lame to begin with.
161
posted on
02/26/2004 5:51:49 AM PST
by
BSunday
(I'm not the bad guy)
To: BSunday
No need. You missing the obvious really isn't my issue.
Dan
162
posted on
02/26/2004 6:37:05 AM PST
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: MrsEmmaPeel
With that same logic, why should childless couples have to pay taxes for schools at all? Because we all benefit from roads, science, medical, pharmy, computer, arts, teachers and so on and so forth. Tax dollars spend on education return to all of us, either directly or indirectly.
However, if I'm Buddist, Mormon, Baptist, (insert group here); I do NOT benefit from paying from a minister who serves a congregation I do not attend. The recipients of the minister are limited only to the congregation to which he belongs. Doctors, engineers, programmers, teachers, ect... serve EVERYBODY regardless of religous belief (and this is enforced by federal law).
163
posted on
02/26/2004 6:45:30 AM PST
by
Hodar
(With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
To: Modernman
On paper you are right, they do have a right to do that, but in practice they don't. When you apply for state grants, or federal subsidized loans, you don't have to tell them what you are studying.
To: cherry
There's a cultural war out there List Of Sane Priorities:
1. Cut taxes.
2. Cut taxes.
3. Cut taxes.
4. Cut taxes.
5. Cut taxes.
.
.
.
47,297. Cut taxes.
47,298. Wage cultural war.
165
posted on
02/26/2004 10:11:16 AM PST
by
steve-b
To: BibChr
Okay, whatever. You being a big jerk really isn't my issue either.
166
posted on
02/26/2004 1:41:06 PM PST
by
BSunday
(I'm not the bad guy)
To: BSunday
Yeah; guys like you hate it when people won't roll over at a word however ignorant from you, don't you?
Better get used to it.
Dan
167
posted on
02/26/2004 1:48:12 PM PST
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: BibChr
Oh please. Don't flatter yourself. I got tired of waiting for something that made sense from you. But sense obviously that will never happen, I retired from the "discussion".
168
posted on
02/27/2004 3:20:36 AM PST
by
BSunday
(I'm not the bad guy)
To: BSunday
Your getting used to eople not rolling over for you isn't starting off well. Try harder. You can do it.
Well, maybe you can't. But you can at least try.
Dan
169
posted on
02/27/2004 6:33:00 AM PST
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: BibChr
Jude 1:9
Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee.
170
posted on
02/27/2004 6:37:23 AM PST
by
BSunday
(I'm not the bad guy)
To: BSunday
True, amen.
You know, I'll give you some free wisdom, based on a lot of observation. No matter what you do, you won't really deal with this until you just deal with it honestly. You choose not to, that's all on you. But all the finger pointing, nastiness, blame-shifting... you'll still have that itch in your conscience, and it'll bug you again and again.
You basically have two choices: deal honestly, or try your best to go do something else, and hope you can forget it.
Up to you. You response will pretty much tell me your choice.
For my part, I hope this religious discrimination in the high court gets turned around soon. It's not right, and it's un-Constitutional.
Dan
171
posted on
02/27/2004 6:45:23 AM PST
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-171 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson