Skip to comments.
DNA Study Traces Ancient Ancestry Of Europeans
CNN.com ^
| 11-10-2000
Posted on 02/22/2004 5:00:24 PM PST by blam
Edited on 04/29/2004 2:03:57 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Four out of five men in Europe share a common male ancestor who lived as a hunter on a wild continent some 40,000 years ago, researchers say.
In a study appearing Friday in the journal Science, researchers say an analysis of a pattern found in the Y chromosome taken from 1,007 men from 25 places in Europe shows that about 80 percent of Europeans arose from the Paleolithic people who first migrated to Europe.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ancestry; ancient; dna; europeans; genetics; godsgravesglyphs; helixmakemineadouble; study
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
To: elli1
The answer is "Yes". A study of the Y chromosome 'markers' (mutations) showed that most of the world's humans descended from a tribe of bushmen who still live in Africa (the ones who communicate by clicking). The current trabal members have faces quite different from Negroes, looking more like Central Asians and Amerinds.
21
posted on
02/22/2004 5:44:13 PM PST
by
expatpat
To: zot
Ping.
To: elli1
The book
The Seven Daughters of Eve reports on a similar analysis using mitochondrial DNA, which are passed only from female to female. The authors use the data to claim that all women in Europe were descended from seven unique female individuals, the "seven daughters of eve". I recommend the first half of the book highly for its scientific content. The second half is a speculative attempt to recreate the daily lives of the seven women.
To: buffyt
I think perhaps as far back as Demeter,
whose rich tresses fall as only a goddesses does.
;^)
24
posted on
02/22/2004 5:47:04 PM PST
by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: Harmless Teddy Bear
woo-woo?????? LOL!!
To: blam
To: Unam Sanctam
I wonder if these are the Indo-Europeans. If so, they imposed their language on the indigenous peoples. Perhaps everyone in Europe spoke an early version of Basque prior to that. Very likely - about 8000 years ago the Indo-European languages started to differentiate and there are some indication that it took place in highlands of Anatolia where agriculture and roots of civilisation took place before the valleys of Mesopotamia and Egypt.
27
posted on
02/22/2004 5:53:50 PM PST
by
A. Pole
(The genocide of Albanians was stopped in its tracks before it began.)
To: A. Pole
What's the current consensus academic thinking on Anatolian agriculturalists versus steppe horsemen as the origins of the Indo-Europeans?
To: blam
My bet is that the 20% were Celts. Does that make sense?Hmm. Would the Celts have had the same Y chromosomes as the rest of the population already in NW Europe?
Basque has no known relatives. Surely some remnant group would have been found by now speaking a related language.
Berber?
Anyway, fascinating.
29
posted on
02/22/2004 5:58:20 PM PST
by
squarebarb
('The stars put out their pale opinions, one by one...' Thomas Merton)
To: blam
This is the key phrase: "a more advanced people, the Neolithic, migrated to Europe from the Middle East". This is a thinly-veiled liberal attempt to do two things: 1. Dispute the Judeo-Christian tradition of man's origins and 2. To promote the idea that the Europeans (no doubt white, capitalistic, racist, war-mongering homophobes) were far less advanced that the migrants from the Middle East, who I'm sure the liberals think saved the Europeans from starvation and ruin (never mind that until the discovery of oil the Middle Easterners were still living the way they did under the Romans). But I'm sure in their mind these peace-loving Islamics will again save Western civilization as soon as their "elite republican guard" decimates the quagmired Americans or we get "bogged down in another 'brutal' Afghan winter."
To: expatpat
"The answer is "Yes". A study of the Y chromosome 'markers' (mutations) showed that most of the world's humans descended from a tribe of bushmen who still live in Africa (the ones who communicate by clicking). " They were also the stars of the hilarious movie, The Gods Must Be Crazy
African Click Language 'Holds Key To Origins Of Earliest Human Speech'
31
posted on
02/22/2004 6:01:06 PM PST
by
blam
To: wagglebee
reading a bit much into it?
32
posted on
02/22/2004 6:01:19 PM PST
by
cyborg
To: blam
Yep, this is all absolutely true and the same scientists, using DNA evidence, proved that OJ is innocent? Nevermind the blood trails, which were not 15000 years old.
To: blam
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Four out of five men in Europe share a common male ancestor who lived as a hunter on a wild continent some 40,000 years ago, researchers say. The guy's name was "Noah", and it was more like 4000 years ago, or so I've heard.
To: wagglebee
"This is the key phrase: "a more advanced people, the Neolithic, migrated to Europe from the Middle East". " You're confusing the present racial distribution of the Middle East with that of the past. The racial make-up was different thousands of years ago. For example, I suspect the Caananites were Proto-Celtics. Goliath was a big Celtic guy ?
35
posted on
02/22/2004 6:11:20 PM PST
by
blam
To: blam
Probably thinking along religious lines
36
posted on
02/22/2004 6:13:16 PM PST
by
cyborg
To: squarebarb
"My bet is that the 20% were Celts. Does that make sense?Hmm. Would the Celts have had the same Y chromosomes as the rest of the population already in NW Europe? " I'm leaning in that direction also. They would be distantly related to all other Europeans of that time.
37
posted on
02/22/2004 6:14:26 PM PST
by
blam
To: blam
Most interesting.
38
posted on
02/22/2004 6:14:45 PM PST
by
Ciexyz
To: greenwolf
"The guy's name was "Noah", and it was more like 4000 years ago, or so I've heard." IMO, closer to 8,000 years ago. Specifically, 7,600 years ago when the Black Sea flooded. (Noah's Flood/)
39
posted on
02/22/2004 6:17:31 PM PST
by
blam
To: maro
Now I see what you were getting at. Interesting question & speculation.
40
posted on
02/22/2004 6:18:33 PM PST
by
elli1
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson