Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush and the National Guard: Case Closed
National Review ^ | February 18, 2004 | Byron York

Posted on 02/18/2004 6:57:38 AM PST by aculeus

EDITOR'S NOTE: This article appears in the March 8, 2004, issue of National Review.

Ask retired Brig. Gen. William Turnipseed whether the press has accurately reported what he said about George W. Bush, and you'll get an earful. "No, I don't think they have," he begins. Turnipseed, the former head of the 187th Tactical Reconnaissance Group of the Alabama Air National Guard, was widely quoted as saying he never saw Bush in Alabama in 1972, and if the future president had been there, he would remember. In fact, Turnipseed says, he doesn't recall whether Bush was there or not; the young flier, then a complete unknown in Alabama, was never part of the 900-man 187th, so Turnipseed wouldn't have had much reason to notice him. But most reporters haven't been interested in Turnipseed's best recollection. "They don't understand the Guard, they don't want to understand the Guard, and they hate Bush," he says. "So when I say, ‘There's a good possibility that Bush showed up,' why would they put that in their articles?"

In recent weeks, Turnipseed has found himself in the middle of a battle in which Democrats have called the president a "deserter" who went "AWOL" for an entire year during his time in the Air National Guard. When Democrats made those accusations — amplified by extensive press coverage — the White House was slow to fight back, insisting that the issue, which came up in the 2000 campaign, was closed and did not merit a response. It was only after NBC's Tim Russert brought the story up during a one-hour interview with the president on February 8 that the White House changed course and released records of the president's Guard service.

Those records have not quieted the most determined of the president's enemies — no one who watches the Democratic opposition really believed they would — but they do make a strong case that Bush fulfilled his duties and met the requirements for Air National Guard officers during his service from 1968 to 1973. A look at those records, along with interviews with people who knew Bush at the time, suggests that after all the shouting is over, and some of the basic facts become known, this latest line of attack on the president will come to nothing.

FOUR YEARS OF FLYING The controversy over Bush's service centers on what his critics call "the period in question," that is, the time from May 1972 until May 1973. What is not mentioned as often is that that period was in fact Bush's fifth year in the Guard, one that followed four years of often intense service.

Bush joined in May 1968. He went through six weeks of basic training — a full-time job — at Lackland Air Force Base in San Antonio, Tex. Then he underwent 53 weeks of flight training — again, full time — at Moody Air Force Base in Valdosta, Ga. Then he underwent 21 weeks of fighter interceptor training — full time — at Ellington Air Force Base in Houston. Counting other, shorter, postings in between, by the end of his training period Bush had served two years on active duty.

Certified to fly the F-102 fighter plane, Bush then began a period of frequent — usually weekly — flying. The F-102 was designed to shoot down other fighter planes, and the missions Bush flew were training flights, mostly over the Gulf of Mexico and often at night, in which pilots took turns being the predator and the prey."If you're going to practice how to shoot down another airplane, then you have to have another airplane up there to work on," recalls retired Col. William Campenni, who flew with Bush in 1970 and 1971. "He'd be the target for the first half of the mission, and then we'd switch."

During that period Bush's superiors gave him consistently high ratings as a pilot. "Lt. Bush is an exceptional fighter interceptor pilot and officer," wrote one in a 1972 evaluation. Another evaluation, in 1971, called Bush "an exceptionally fine young officer and pilot" who "continually flies intercept missions with the unit to increase his proficiency even further." And a third rating, in 1970, said Bush "clearly stands out as a top notch fighter interceptor pilot" and was also "a natural leader whom his contemporaries look to for leadership."

All that flying involved quite a bit of work. "Being a pilot is more than just a monthly appearance," says Bob Harmon, a former Guard pilot who was a member of Bush's group in 1971 and 1972. "You cannot maintain your currency by doing just one drill a month. He was flying once or twice a week during that time, from May of 1971 until May of 1972." While the work was certainly not as dangerous as fighting in the jungles of Vietnam, it wasn't exactly safe, either. Harmon remembers a half-dozen Texas Air National Guard fliers who died in accidents over the years, in cluding one during the time Bush was flying. "This was not an endeavor without risk," Harmon notes.

THE MOVE TO ALABAMA The records show that Bush kept up his rigorous schedule of flying through the spring of 1972: He was credited for duty on ten days in March of that year, and seven days in April. Then, as Bush began his fifth year of service in the Guard, he appears to have stepped back dramatically. The records indicate that he received no credit in May, June, July, August, and September 1972. In October, he was credited with two days, and in November he was credited with four. There were no days in December, and then six in January 1973. Then there were no days in February and March.

The change was the result of Bush's decision to go to Alabama to work on the Senate campaign of Republican Winton Blount. With an obligation to the Guard, Bush asked to perform equivalent service in Alabama. That was not an unusual request, given that members of the Guard, like everyone else, often moved around the country. "It was a common thing," recalls Brigadier General Turnipseed. "If we had had a guy in Houston, he could have made equivalent training with Bush's unit. It was so common that the guy who wrote the letter telling Bush to come didn't even tell me about it."

The president's critics have charged that he did not show up for service — was "AWOL" — in Alabama. Bush says he did serve, and his case is supported by records showing that he was paid and given retirement credit for days of service while he was known to be in Alabama. The records also show that Bush received a dental examination on January 6, 1973, at Dannelly Air National Guard base, home of the 187th (January 6 was one of the days that pay records show Bush receiving credit for service). And while a number of Guard members at the base say they do not remember seeing Bush among the roughly 900 men who served there during that time, another member, a retired lieutenant named John Calhoun, says he remembers seeing Bush at the base several times.

What seems most likely is that Bush was indeed at Dannelly, but there was not very much for a non-flying pilot to do. Flying fighter jets involves constant practice and training; Bush had to know when he left Texas that he would no longer be able to engage in either one very often, which meant that he would essentially leave flying, at least for some substantial period of time. In addition, the 187th could not accommodate another pilot, at least regularly. "He was not going to fly," says Turnipseed. "We didn't have enough airplanes or sorties to handle our own pilots, so we wouldn't have done it for some guy passing through."

On the other hand, showing up for drills was still meeting one's responsibility to the Guard. And, as 1973 went along, the evidence suggests that Bush stepped up his work to make up for the time he had missed earlier. In April of that year, he received credit for two days; in May, he received credit for 14 days; in June, five days; and in July, 19 days. That was the last service Bush performed in the Guard. Later that year, he asked for and received permission to leave the Guard early so he could attend Harvard Business School. He was given an honorable discharge after serving five years, four months, and five days of his original six-year commitment.

The records indicate that, despite his move to Alabama, Bush met his obligation to the Guard in the 1972-73 year. At that time, Guardsmen were awarded points based on the days they reported for duty each year. They were given 15 points just for being in the Guard, and were then required to accumulate a total of 50 points to satisfy the annual requirement. In his first four years of service, Bush piled up lots of points; he earned 253 points in his first year, 340 in his second, 137 in his third, and 112 in his fourth. For the year from May 1972 to May 1973, records show Bush earned 56 points, a much smaller total, but more than the minimum requirement (his service was measured on a May-to-May basis because he first joined the Guard in that month in 1968).

Bush then racked up another 56 points in June and July of 1973, which met the minimum requirement for the 1973-74 year, which was Bush's last year of service. Together, the record "clearly shows that First Lieutenant George W. Bush has satisfactory years for both '72-'73 and '73-'74, which proves that he completed his military obligation in a satisfactory manner," says retired Lt. Col. Albert Lloyd, a Guard personnel officer who reviewed the records at the request of the White House.

All in all, the documents show that Bush served intensively for four years and then let up in his fifth and sixth years, although he still did enough to meet Guard requirements. The records also suggest that Bush's superiors were not only happy with his performance from 1968 to 1972, but also happy with his decision to go to Alabama. Indeed, Bush's evaluating officer wrote in May 1972 that "Lt. Bush is very active in civic affairs in the community and manifests a deep interest in the operation of our government. He has recently accepted the position as campaign manager for a candidate for United States Senate. He is a good representative of the military and Air National Guard in the business world."

Beyond their apparent hope that Bush would be a good ambassador for the Guard, Bush's superiors might have been happy with his decision to go into politics for another reason: They simply had more people than they needed. "In 1972, there was an enormous glut of pilots," says Campenni. "The Vietnam War was winding down, and the Air Force was putting pilots in desk jobs. In '72 or '73, if you were a pilot, active or Guard, and you had an obligation and wanted to get out, no problem. In fact, you were helping them solve their problem."

THE UNENDING ATTACK Despite the evidence, Democrats have continued to accuse the president of shirking his duty during his Guard career. "He went to Alabama for one year," Democratic National Committee chairman Terry McAuliffe said on ABC on February 1. "He didn't show up. Call it whatever you want, AWOL, it doesn't matter." After Bush made his Guard records public, McAuliffe released a statement saying the documents "create more questions than answers." Other Democrats, as well as an energetic team of liberal columnists and bloggers, echoed McAuliffe's comments.

Perhaps the most impressive accomplishment of Bush's detractors is that they managed to sell the idea — mostly unchallenged in the press — that Bush's Air National Guard service consisted of one year during which he didn't show up for duty. Far fewer people asked the question: Just how did Bush become a fighter pilot in the first place? Didn't that involve, say, years of work? Bush's four years of service prior to May 1972 were simply airbrushed out of the picture because many reporters did not believe they were part of the story.

It also seems likely that some of Bush's adversaries used the Guard issue as a way to get at other questions about the president. The Guard record was said to have a bearing on Bush's credibility, on the war in Iraq, on his fitness to lead. In addition, some journalists were nearly obsessed with forcing the president to release medical records from his time in the Guard because they hoped those records might reveal some evidence of drug use. The White House did not release the full set of medical records but did allow reporters to view them; the documents were entirely unexcep tional and contained nothing about drug use.

While all that was going on, both the White House and the Bush reelection campaign seemed consistently to underestimate the ferocity and resolve of the president's adversaries. For weeks, as the controversy grew, the president did nothing to defend himself. Those who wanted to speak up in his defense, like William Campenni and Bob Harmon, were not contacted by the White House; instead, they decided to go public on their own. Even when John Calhoun, the man who remembers Bush in Alabama, sent the White House an e-mail saying he had useful information, he received a stock response, without any indication the White House was interested in what he had to say.

Now the evidence is public; anyone who is interested in learning about Bush's service can do so. In the end, the president had the facts on his side. But he also had the good fortune to have the allegiance of men who feel so intensely about the Guard and their service that they wanted to speak out even if the White House didn't seem to care. Men like Campenni and Harmon were deeply offended when Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry equated Guard service during the Vietnam War with fleeing the country or going to jail. That was simply too much. "I'm not a Bushie," says Harmon. "The thing that got a few of us crawling out from under a rock, at no instigation from the White House, was that Guard service was being portrayed as being like a draft dodger." http://www.nationalreview.com/york/york200402180840.asp


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: 2004; awol; bush; byronyork; caseclosed; gwb2004; militaryrecord
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 02/18/2004 6:57:38 AM PST by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Heh, last week I had emailed Rich Lowery a link to Hon's thread about his telephone conversation with Turnipseed suggesting that Natl Review needed to jump on it. Appears they did.
2 posted on 02/18/2004 7:04:59 AM PST by The G Man (John Kerry? America just can't afford a 9/10 President in a 9/11 world. Vote Bush-Cheny '04.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Now if they can just get the facts staight about what David Kay said. This NG story is being cleared up and will go away now because Kerry wants it to go away.
3 posted on 02/18/2004 7:06:04 AM PST by beckysueb (Lady Liberty is in danger! Bush/Cheney 04.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Great post....Now I demand to see Kerry's military records.....but not till after the convention.
4 posted on 02/18/2004 7:07:39 AM PST by hoosiermama (Ask Kerry to list the major pieces of enacted legislation he has authored in his career.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
"Even when John Calhoun, the man who remembers Bush in Alabama, sent the White House an e-mail saying he had useful information, he received a stock response, without any indication the White House was interested in what he had to say."

This bespeaks of over-confidence. W reminds me of my own kid, in both his assets and his liabilities. Over-confidence is one of the latter that they both share.

He better be prepared to really RUN for re-election, we need him to be our prez. He better not sit back and let any of the dwarves sneak in the back door.
5 posted on 02/18/2004 7:09:56 AM PST by jocon307 (The dems don't get it, the American people do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hon
Turnipseed ping!
6 posted on 02/18/2004 7:10:24 AM PST by The G Man (John Kerry? America just can't afford a 9/10 President in a 9/11 world. Vote Bush-Cheny '04.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: The G Man
At the risk of being immodest, I sent what I had found out about the Turnipseed story and a link to my thread here about it to an acquaintance in management at National Review.

Debunking The Bush AWOL Story - From The Horse's Mouth
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1073076/posts

He said that he would pass it on, and that they would probably do a story on it. This looks like that story.
8 posted on 02/18/2004 7:44:19 AM PST by Hon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: notorious vrc
"this case will come to nothing" WELL, it should come to treason against our President for making false accusations and all those culpable in promoting this ought to be thrown in jail...It's disgusting that such trash is even aired on television or taking up print space on newspapers! We're fighting a 2 front enemy line - terrorists and democrats~
9 posted on 02/18/2004 7:44:45 AM PST by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
York is a dreamer! I hate it when people do this!

York is using logic and persuasive evidence to argue his position. The vicious and sleazy crap weasels aren't interested in logic! They know what they believe and aren't interested in facts! When are we going to learn this??

Some scumbag dem will review all that material and find some insignificant error ("AUGUST 6, 1972 WAS A WEDNESDAY, NOT A THURSDAY") and take it as proof of everything they have been told to believe but the self-loathing Bush haters. I guarantee that you'll hear about this issue all the way up to election, often mentioned by left wing media presstitutes who'll tlk about Bush rumors but require absolute proof about Kerry's girlfriends or Dean's abortions.

The White House may have played this silly game too much. Thus, every other viscious rumor that does not get extensive response by Bush will be presumed to be true because of the difference. The only positive is that we can turn this same logic on Kerry. I will want to see the terms of his prenuptual agreement especially to see what the effect of his attack on tax breaks for the wealthy would be on his own and the Widow Heinz's wealth.

10 posted on 02/18/2004 7:48:17 AM PST by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Counting other, shorter, postings in between, by the end of his training period Bush had served two years on active duty.

Isn't this something like 600% of the time that Kerry was in Vietnam?
11 posted on 02/18/2004 7:50:29 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jocon307
It just tells me that no one is reading White House emails.
12 posted on 02/18/2004 7:55:00 AM PST by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tacis
York is using logic and persuasive evidence to argue his position. The vicious and sleazy crap weasels aren't interested in logic! They know what they believe and aren't interested in facts! When are we going to learn this??

You're missing the point. York isn't using logic and persuasive evidence to try to persuade the "vicious and sleazy crap weasels" about anything, viz Those records have not quieted the most determined of the president's enemies — no one who watches the Democratic opposition really believed they would — He's laying out the story for those who aren't the weasels so that when they hear the weasels they will realize just how vicious and sleazy the crap-peddlers actually are.
13 posted on 02/18/2004 8:01:05 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: princess leah
! We're fighting a 2 front enemy line - terrorists and democrats~

IRONIC, ain't it? The terrorists (worldwide organized crime) are openly FUNDING the DEMOCRATIC candidates. In ways and amounts that AMERICANS are not allowed to do.

Now, I don't think Kerry is any worse than most politicians, but that only puts him on a level slightly below trustee's in prison.

He will say anything to get the job, then exploit the position for his own profit, while forgetting about all those promises and plans. Kerry has proven he is two-faced and distorts the truth (lies) in order to achieve his goals.

Whereas President Bush has a questionable area in his service record likely due to lack of communication by his command chain, Kerry seems to have played the lawyer game, using the words of the law to get out of his duty quicker, instead of following the intent of the law.

I DO NOT WANT A PRESIDENT that plays game with WORDS to decide whether the law applies to him or not, and you. Usually the case is NOT him, BUT DEFINITELY YOU.

I like having a President who bases his INTERPRETATION, ENFORCEMENT, and VOTING POWER on laws on MORAL and RELIGIOUS (Christian values primarily but not limited to) grounds.

ONE NATION, UNDER GOD.

I like having a PRESIDENT that other nations are respectful of. I like having a President that is saying what I am saying.

If it is WRONG, we must stop it. We know GOOD, we know EVIL. We support GOOD, we fight EVIL.

WE WILL NO LONGER TURN OUR HEAD!

14 posted on 02/18/2004 8:06:03 AM PST by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: The G Man; Hon
Hate to brag but I didn't contact anyone at NR ... but they still did what I wanted them to do.
15 posted on 02/18/2004 8:14:35 AM PST by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
LOL!

I bow to your superior (and much more efficient) mind powers!

16 posted on 02/18/2004 8:19:18 AM PST by The G Man (John Kerry? America just can't afford a 9/10 President in a 9/11 world. Vote Bush-Cheny '04.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jocon307
"He better be prepared to really RUN for re-election, we need him to be our prez. He better not sit back and let any of the dwarves sneak in the back door."

Maybe I'm totally wrong about all of this, but I become increasingly convinced that Bush will be re-elected. Reasons: once the Bush team starts (as you said, sooner rather than later!), it will become clear who needs to be running the country. AND, if Hillary Clinton really intends to run for the presidency, I don't think Team Clinton will allow any other democratic candidate to win this time. I think she knows it will be really tough for her to win in 2004, and she needs a few more years to soften the public up to the idea of a woman president. And if a democrat SHOULD win this time, she knows we'll all be so sick of how things go sour that we wouldn't vote for ANY democrat in 2008. When I saw her interview with Katy Couric yesterday morning (on the same time as Sean Hannity on 'Good Morning, America'!), I began to realize then how she actually COULD become president one of these days! A very scary thought... Nope! They'll let Bush have 4 more years, then move in for the kill...
17 posted on 02/18/2004 8:30:18 AM PST by Maria S ("I will do whatever the Americans want…I saw what happened in Iraq, and I was afraid." Gaddafi, 9/03)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hon
Hmmm didn't hanoi john get an EARLY OUT too? we need to remind folks of that fact.:-)
18 posted on 02/18/2004 10:30:15 AM PST by GailA (Millington Rally for America after action http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/872519/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
An excellent piece, but Mr. York has failed to consider the possibility that the White House doesn't want this issue to go away. Bashing everyone who served in the Vietnam era in a capacity other than combat in Vietnam as a draft dodger is loopy. And keeping Vietnam alive as an issue is even loopier in light of Kerry's Vietnam veteran bashing and pacifist voting record. Did you notice President Bush personally paid the Guard a visit?
19 posted on 02/18/2004 10:40:40 AM PST by colorado tanker ("There are but two parties now, Traitors and Patriots")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
I didn't mean it as a brag. But the amazing thing is that one person, even just sitting at a keyboard, can help to get the facts out.

We should encourage each other as much as possible to do that, don't you think?
20 posted on 02/18/2004 11:04:24 AM PST by Hon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson