Skip to comments.
CA: The Chronicle Recommends Boxer challenger (Bill Jones)
San Francisco Chronicle ^
| February 15, 2004
| San Francisco Chronicle
Posted on 02/15/2004 12:57:37 PM PST by calcowgirl
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:45:46 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
AMONG THE Republican March 2 primary hopefuls vying for the seat occupied by Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., one candidate has a clear edge in experience and command of the issues -- former Secretary of State Bill Jones.
Jones proved to be a coolly professional state officer during his two terms as California's elections chief. He revamped the office and brought modern technology to bear on many lingering elections problems in the state. He made voting issues accessible through the Internet and most important, showed a quick willingness to investigate accusations of election fraud independent of partisan politics.
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: 2004; billjones; electionussenate; kaloogian; rosariomarin; tonicasey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
What is up with this? No mention of Kaloogian at all.
To: calcowgirl
Could the following mean that we may have a political shakeup in northern CA?
I think this endorsement means that Boxer is toast because of her ties to Indian casinos and there must be internal polling to show her numbers falling.
Bill Jones is the type of RINO the Chron believes they can pressure with editorials.
Woolsey now has the infamous apology for the leniency letter she sent to a judge in a teen rape case. See:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1078698/posts?page=31#31 Teen (rape) victim rejects Woolsey's apology
To: calcowgirl
Kaloogian probably didn't interview with the Chronicle. Kinda like vampires avoiding churches and crosses and holy water.
3
posted on
02/15/2004 1:13:37 PM PST
by
JohnnyZ
(Burkeman1 predicted Kerry would win NH. I told him he was a moron. Oops!)
To: calcowgirl
That's not saying much. They would have endorsed Jim Jones.
4
posted on
02/15/2004 1:30:19 PM PST
by
Paleo Conservative
(Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
To: calcowgirl
"Jones, unlike them, is an opponent of abortion rights"
He wont beat Boxer. Someone on here wrote one time Californians woudl vote for $5 per gallon gas and terrorists running up and down every street just os long as abortion was legal
5
posted on
02/15/2004 1:32:30 PM PST
by
raloxk
To: raloxk
He wont beat Boxer. Someone on here wrote one time Californians woudl vote for $5 per gallon gas and terrorists running up and down every street just as long as abortion was legal Consider that California had loosened its abortion laws in 1967, what they really want is to impose abortion on demand on the rest of the country. Even if a future SCOTUS reversed Roe v Wade, it would only return the issue back to the states. I'm quite sure the California Assembly would write abortion language into new law that would keep abortion in California just as easily available as it is now under Roe. A US Senator would have very little to say about the abortion laws even within his or her home state.
6
posted on
02/15/2004 1:41:01 PM PST
by
Paleo Conservative
(Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
To: TatooChick; Impeach98; EternalVigilance
Bill Jones Chronicle Endorsement.... the kiss of death?
7
posted on
02/15/2004 1:55:32 PM PST
by
calcowgirl
(No on Propositions 55, 56, 57, 58)
To: calcowgirl
No mention of Kaloogian at all.
Then they must fear him the most.
Another reason to vote for Howard.
To: calcowgirl
What is up with this? No mention of Kaloogian at allKaloogian is not a country club Repbulican or RINO and therefore will never be endorsed by a rag like the Chronicle.
I suppose the elitist/Country Club Repbulicans, Schwarznegger, Hugh Hewitt, John Campbell, Pete Wilson, David Dreier, et. al. will never endorse or support Kaloogian.
9
posted on
02/15/2004 2:10:28 PM PST
by
AreaMan
To: Paleo Conservative
youre right but the shrill Boxer wont ever let teh debate be framed that way
10
posted on
02/15/2004 2:14:14 PM PST
by
raloxk
To: CounterCounterCulture; Carry_Okie
Then they must fear him the most. That was my thought exactly. I haven't seen any other article that mentions Casey and Marin, let alone quote them, without also including at least a mention of Kaloogian. Seems like the Jones campaign must have gotten cozy with the Chron, imo.
I preferred Howard, but wanted to watch Jones for a while. This endorsement now makes me highly skeptical of Jones.
11
posted on
02/15/2004 2:20:53 PM PST
by
calcowgirl
(No on Propositions 55, 56, 57, 58)
To: calcowgirl
Whatever else Bill Jones may be, he's the dullest man in politics. Listening to him speak, even on a topic I care about, is enough to make my eyes roll up in the back of my head. My take is that the Chronically Wrongical would love for a snoozer to go against Boxer.
To: John Jorsett
Yep.
Hey, we learned how to spell Schwarzeneggar, we can learn to spell Kaloogian. ;-)
13
posted on
02/15/2004 6:11:14 PM PST
by
EternalVigilance
(An income tax is like a cowpie...Flatten it, and it's still a cowpie...)
To: John Jorsett; calcowgirl; Ernest_at_the_Beach; heleny
"My take is that the Chronically Wrongical would love for a snoozer to go against Boxer."Exactamundo!!!
After the endless barrage of "news" stories on both radio and TV about the MOCKERY OF MARRIAGE, I can't believe they didn't have something to say about Jones' stand on SAME SEX MARRIAGE, or MARRIAGE TO ANIMALS, or worse still... MARRIAGE TO BARBARA BOXER!!!
I'm so sick of the media's heavy breathing over the San Fransicko scoff-laws and their QUEER NATION MARRIAGES, that I've advanced to the dry heaves!!!
14
posted on
02/15/2004 9:26:56 PM PST
by
SierraWasp
(EnvironMentalism is NOW beyond the point of "Diminishing Returns!" GANG-GREEN is setting in!!!)
To: Paleo Conservative
I'm quite sure the California Assembly would write abortion language into new law that would keep abortion in California just as easily available as it is now under Roe. I'm not certain, but I think they have already done so.
15
posted on
02/15/2004 10:50:08 PM PST
by
JohnnyZ
(Burkeman1 predicted Kerry would win NH. I told him he was a moron. Oops!)
To: CounterCounterCulture
That was our thought... how on earth can The Chronicle write all but one of their news stories on the race never mentioning Kaloogian and then editorialize without mentioning him again?
To: CounterCounterCulture
Then they must fear him the most. You bet they fear him!
17
posted on
02/16/2004 12:05:59 PM PST
by
TatooChick
(Praise the Lord...and pass the ammunition)
To: JohnnyZ; Paleo Conservative
>>I'm quite sure the California Assembly would write abortion language into new law that would keep abortion in California just as easily available as it is now under Roe.
I'm not certain, but I think they have already done so.
Yes, Davis signed the "Reproductive Privacy Act" in 2002. (SB 1301, Kuehl; Assembly votes, Senate votes)
If Roe vs. Wade were ever overturned, allowing states to determine their own abortion policies, abortion would have become prohibited in CA due to preexisting laws. So, the Democrats authored the new law to guarantee the "right" to have an abortion in CA even if anything changed on the federal level.
18
posted on
02/16/2004 7:49:22 PM PST
by
heleny
(No on propositions 55, 56, 57, 58)
To: calcowgirl
No mention of Kaloogian at all. Maybe they disagreed with him on the Recall or blamed him for leading CA to oust Davis.
19
posted on
02/16/2004 7:52:41 PM PST
by
heleny
(No on propositions 55, 56, 57, 58)
To: heleny
If Roe vs. Wade were ever overturned, allowing states to determine their own abortion policies, abortion would have become prohibited in CA due to preexisting laws Not true. In 1967 Governor Ronald Reagan as one of his first acts as governor signed a bill "liberalizing" abortion laws in California. That law however was nowhere nearly as permissive as Roe v Wade.
The fact that the California Assembly and Senate passed a law signed by Governor Gray Davis codifying the level of permissiveness in California that existed under Roe v Wade demonstrates that the real goal of polititicians like Barbara Boxer is not to defend the right of California to decide its own abortion laws but to force that level of permissivness of abortion on all the states. I might add that if it were up to politicans like Barbara Boxer, the state governments would effectively be abolished and leftist policies they espouse would also be forced on the whole country.
20
posted on
02/16/2004 9:10:47 PM PST
by
Paleo Conservative
(Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson