To: raloxk
He wont beat Boxer. Someone on here wrote one time Californians woudl vote for $5 per gallon gas and terrorists running up and down every street just as long as abortion was legal Consider that California had loosened its abortion laws in 1967, what they really want is to impose abortion on demand on the rest of the country. Even if a future SCOTUS reversed Roe v Wade, it would only return the issue back to the states. I'm quite sure the California Assembly would write abortion language into new law that would keep abortion in California just as easily available as it is now under Roe. A US Senator would have very little to say about the abortion laws even within his or her home state.
6 posted on
02/15/2004 1:41:01 PM PST by
Paleo Conservative
(Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
To: Paleo Conservative
youre right but the shrill Boxer wont ever let teh debate be framed that way
10 posted on
02/15/2004 2:14:14 PM PST by
raloxk
To: Paleo Conservative
I'm quite sure the California Assembly would write abortion language into new law that would keep abortion in California just as easily available as it is now under Roe. I'm not certain, but I think they have already done so.
15 posted on
02/15/2004 10:50:08 PM PST by
JohnnyZ
(Burkeman1 predicted Kerry would win NH. I told him he was a moron. Oops!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson