Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: heleny
If Roe vs. Wade were ever overturned, allowing states to determine their own abortion policies, abortion would have become prohibited in CA due to preexisting laws

Not true. In 1967 Governor Ronald Reagan as one of his first acts as governor signed a bill "liberalizing" abortion laws in California. That law however was nowhere nearly as permissive as Roe v Wade.

The fact that the California Assembly and Senate passed a law signed by Governor Gray Davis codifying the level of permissiveness in California that existed under Roe v Wade demonstrates that the real goal of polititicians like Barbara Boxer is not to defend the right of California to decide its own abortion laws but to force that level of permissivness of abortion on all the states. I might add that if it were up to politicans like Barbara Boxer, the state governments would effectively be abolished and leftist policies they espouse would also be forced on the whole country.

20 posted on 02/16/2004 9:10:47 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Paleo Conservative
Thanks for the correction! You're right that abortions wouldn't be prohibited, but they would have had to qualify as "theraputic" or whatever, which was because the existing law then was stricter than the now-current law.
21 posted on 02/17/2004 8:22:22 AM PST by heleny (No on propositions 55, 56, 57, 58)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson