Skip to comments.
Kerry denies allegations of infidelity
Washington Times ^
| Feb 13 2004
| UPI
Posted on 02/13/2004 10:15:59 AM PST by new cruelty
Edited on 07/12/2004 3:41:17 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
"Well, there is nothing to report," Kerry told the talk radio show Imus in the Morning. "So there is nothing to talk about. I'm not worried about it. No."
The story, widely covered by U.S. and British media Friday, was based on a report on the Internet tabloid site DrudgeReport.com, run by Matt Drudge. Drudge's report alleged Kerry had been seeing a former Associated Press employee who has left the country at his behest.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; bimboeruption; charlatan; clark; fraud; imus; kerry; liar; liberalmediabias; longface; mediablackout
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
To: new cruelty
Prince Parsefal
To: new cruelty
Look, this is pretty simple:
If he denies it I would believe him. The risks these days of not telling the truth up front are quite severe.
If it isn't true he has everything to gain by saying so.
Therefore, if he doesn't deny it then it is true.
To: conservative coonass
There is an evidence trail here dating back six years. Democrats think they live in a 30 day cycle of clean rebirth. They rewrite their own positions before the ink is dry and they think that they can run their lives that way because they have gotten away with it for so long.
The problem is that you can't just shred and rewrite personal behavior which others participated in. Sure you can kill the other parties involved. It's been done before. Just ask the swimmer and Bubba. But Kerry dips his wick in wealthy ink. No trailer trash you can just take out in a drive-by.
23
posted on
02/13/2004 10:31:16 AM PST
by
blackdog
(Democrat Party? Democratic Party? Democrat Candidate? Democratic Candidate? Wassup wit dat?)
To: blackdog
~But Kerry dips his wick in wealthy ink~
Your metaphores are true genius.
24
posted on
02/13/2004 10:33:12 AM PST
by
mlbford2
To: new cruelty
"Well, there is
nothing to report," Kerry told the talk radio show Imus in the Morning. "So
there is nothing to talk about. I'm not
worried about it. No."
So, our dysfunctional, sycophantic 'press' terms this a denial?
Hardly - this is a Clinton-class dodge of the highest order!
NOTHING in this statement can realistically be classified as saying:
- "I didn't do anything" or
- "the events discussed never took place".
25
posted on
02/13/2004 10:35:16 AM PST
by
_Jim
( <--- Ann C. and Rush L. speak on gutless Liberals (RealAudio files))
To: jimbo123
You've been posting that on every thread...when are you going to add some links?
26
posted on
02/13/2004 10:35:58 AM PST
by
Krodg
To: new cruelty
I did not have sex with those women. Those bodacious, beautiful, wonderful women. Whoa, is the room spinning or is it me? Medic!
27
posted on
02/13/2004 10:36:05 AM PST
by
searchandrecovery
(Justice is the final pillar to fall.)
To: jimbo123
Good grief! Are you trying to attain a FR record for posting the same post over and over the most times? FR could use you during the FReepathons.
28
posted on
02/13/2004 10:37:26 AM PST
by
NautiNurse
(Missing Iraqi botulinum toxin? Look at John Kerry's face)
To: GailA
in that blog entry, it already was setting up the right to take the blame? Incredible. One of Weasley Clark's minions spreads the story, says it will be in TIME magazine (hardly a GOP mouthpiece) and predicts everyone will blame the Republicans. Sadly, he's right. The Republicans, the Bush Campaign, "right wingers" in general, all will be (or already are being) blamed for this vicious hit piece, so everyone can quickly ignore it (and not bother to consider that it might be true, and what that says about John F-ing Interns Kerry's character).
29
posted on
02/13/2004 10:41:07 AM PST
by
mountaineer
(Metaphors be with you!)
To: GailA; William McKinley
So this whole thing could have been a sting by the RATS to blame this on Republican dirty tricksters.
30
posted on
02/13/2004 10:42:07 AM PST
by
Dog
To: TheBigB
I'm not sure of the source but I think I this is from Hannity's interview of Drudge yesterday on his radio show. Supposedly, Gore was interested in Kerry for the VP slot in 2000 but he was running away from being tied to Clinton's affairs. Gore knew of Kerry's weakness for women other than Teresa so went with Lieberman instead.
Thank God he did. What would 2000 have been without Sore Loserman?
31
posted on
02/13/2004 10:42:38 AM PST
by
Republican Red
(Karmic hugs welcomed!)
To: mountaineer
Amazing and I think Drudge.....Hannity....and Rush fell for it.
32
posted on
02/13/2004 10:43:33 AM PST
by
Dog
To: new cruelty
Kerry did not deny he had sex with the woman. Just that there was nothing to the story. Big difference. Imus should have asked him if he ever been unfaithful to his Wife.
To: Dog
Amazing and I think Drudge.....Hannity....and Rush fell for it. And so, it appears, did Alex whats-her-name's dad ...
</sarcasm>
WHY is Alex whats-her-name over in Kenya again?
34
posted on
02/13/2004 10:48:48 AM PST
by
_Jim
( <--- Ann C. and Rush L. speak on gutless Liberals (RealAudio files))
To: TheBigB
This is the first I'm seeing about Al. Wonder what their source was for this?
From what I've read, Gore considered Kerry for the VP slot in 2000 but backed off because of Kerry's reputation (and, supposedly, a 1998 affair) & chose Lieberman instead. Obviously, because of Clinton, Gore wanted to distance himself from that sort of sordid stuff. My impression was that this was pretty common knowledge w/in certain circles.
Some good theories in this article splaining some of the recent Dem party political intrigue (major players situating themselves for a ''brokered convention''):
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1077440/posts
35
posted on
02/13/2004 10:49:10 AM PST
by
elli1
To: blackdog
Great analysis of the 30 day cycle of Democratic rebirth and that Kerry likes to marry money.
However, with the youth of the young woman (ala Clinton) he's playing at being young again and would risk the money to recapture that. He manifests that in his speeches, his campaign music choices, his cliched rhetoric, and his motorcycle schtick (sp). He's a tired old fool.
In another age men like Clinton and Kerry would be called roues.
To: new cruelty
Why are they reporting that Kerry denied the rumor? He did nothing of the sort. He just spoke in Clintonese.
37
posted on
02/13/2004 10:53:43 AM PST
by
Dante3
To: Dog
Except that Clark told 16 reporters about Kerry's intern problem imploding his campaign.
Also, Drudge had an email from Craig Crawford(?) talking about Chris Lehene shopping the story around. Also, they have Dean refusing to get out of the race because of this and I heard on Rush (so no links) that Dean kept saying this was not a story he would pursue while at the same time shopping it around to reporters imploring them to run with it.
The blame Republican angle might have actually been the plan but I think that by Drudge going on the offense and exposing it before Time did ruined the plan.
They have already tried the Republican dirty tricks. It will get some traction but even Kerry supporter IMUS this morning finally admitted it was a Clinton hit job.
38
posted on
02/13/2004 10:54:36 AM PST
by
Republican Red
(Karmic hugs welcomed!)
To: Dog
Absolutely.
Check out unsycophant's post on it here.
To: mountaineer
One of Weasley Clark's minions spreads the story, ...
Then Weasley endorses Kerry so that leads to one of two scenarios, both of which the goal is to bring Kerry down because he's getting too far ahead...one scenario is that Weasley slides into Kerry's ''slot'' & the other is that HRC slithers into Kerry's slot. Dr. Dean is still out there with Al Gore's endorsement. Could be a behind the scenes showdown at the Dem convention--Clinton (Clark) vs Gore. The question of whether it's Clark or HRC in the position against Gore will be determined by the political climate (Bush's vulnerability) at the time of the convention. Maybe.
40
posted on
02/13/2004 11:07:12 AM PST
by
elli1
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson