Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Putin Laments Death of the Soviet Union
ABC News ^ | Feb. 12

Posted on 02/12/2004 5:18:22 PM PST by nickcarraway

Russian President Vladimir Putin Laments Death of Soviet Union in Campaign Speech

MOSCOW Feb. 12 — President Vladimir Putin used a campaign speech Thursday to declare the demise of the Soviet Union a "national tragedy on an enormous scale," in what appeared to be his strongest-ever lament of the collapse of the Soviet empire. Putin, a former agent of the Soviet KGB spy agency, has praised aspects of the Soviet Union in the past but never so robustly nor in such an important political setting.

"The breakup of the Soviet Union is a national tragedy on an enormous scale," from which "only the elites and nationalists of the republics gained," Putin said in a nationally televised speech to about 300 campaign workers gathered at Moscow State University.

The president's language was sure to send a chill through the 14 other former Soviet republics that have been independent from Moscow rule for more than a decade.

In the past and to audiences from the former republics, Putin has sought to ease fears about Russia having designs on rebuilding the old empire.

In September remarks after a meeting of the Commonwealth of Independent States the grouping of former Soviet republics Putin said:

"The Soviet Union (was) a very complicated page in the history of our people," adding "that train has left."

But on Thursday, he spoke in a much stronger tone, appearing to play to Russian nationalism.

"I think that ordinary citizens of the former Soviet Union and the post-Soviet space gained nothing from this. On the contrary, people have faced a huge number of problems," he said.

"Today we must look at the reality we live in. We cannot only look back and curse about this issue. We must look forward," he said.

Across town, meanwhile, Putin challengers in the election next month refused to debate among themselves in a television program called for that purpose. The candidates said a debate was meaningless without Putin, who says he doesn't need the free television advertising.

At the taping of what was to be the first debate ahead of the March 14 vote, four of Putin's six challengers answered questions from the studio audience, but then rejected the host's appeal that they debate each other.

"Bring Vladimir Putin here and we will have a debate," independent liberal candidate Irina Khakamada said, winning applause from the audience.

Calling it pointless to debate with anyone but Putin, "my main competitor", Communist candidate Nikolai Kharitonov said that by ignoring the debates, "Putin is depriving the population of the right to choose."

Also at the taping were candidates Sergei Glazyev of the populist-nationalist Homeland Party and Oleg Malyshkin of Vladimir Zhirinovsky's ultranationalist Liberal Democratic Party.

Regardless of Putin's public declarations about campaign advertising, state-controlled television channels already lavish him with extensive coverage as on Thursday when state-run Rossiya showed his remarks live.

Addressing a packed auditorium at Moscow State University, Putin said: "The head of state should not engage in self-advertising."

"Nevertheless," he continued, "I am simply obliged before my voters and the entire country to account for what has been done during the past four years, and to tell people what I intend to do during the next four years."

Responding to a question after his state-of-the-nation-style speech, Putin said that the 1991 Soviet collapse which most Russians regret led to few gains and many problems for ordinary citizens.

Turning to global politics, Putin said that Russia must become a "full-fledged member of the world community" and assailed those in the West who still have a Cold War-era distrust of Russia. They "can't get out of the freezer," he said.

Putin reiterated his stated opposition to prolonging his time in office, limited to two terms. But he indicated he would choose a preferred successor, saying that the task of any top leader "is to propose to society a person he considers worthy to work further in this position."

Some Putin opponents had considered boycotting the presidential election, saying a fair vote was impossible in Russia today, and the refusal to debate in Thursday's program reflected the candidates' anger at the president's dominance of the campaign.

Some political analysts said, however, the public does not expect Putin to debate.

"They see the head of state as a monarch who shouldn't participate in discussions with those below him in the hierarchy," said Andrei Ryabov of the Carnegie Institute in Moscow said.

The Organization for the Security and Cooperation in Europe said the state-controlled media's parliamentary campaign coverage was slanted toward pro-Putin forces and accused the government of pressuring news media, to limit opposition views.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Russia
KEYWORDS: 2004; capitalism; communism; elections; nostalgia; putin; putinsbuttboys; russia; sovietunion; ussr; vladimirputin; vladtheimploder
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201 next last

1 posted on 02/12/2004 5:18:23 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
This can't be right;Bush looked into his buddy's eyes and saw a "good man".

Reagan was never duped like this. I miss him.
2 posted on 02/12/2004 5:32:57 PM PST by Finalapproach29er ("Don't shoot Mongo, you'll only make him mad.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Finalapproach29er
I'd vote for him today.
3 posted on 02/12/2004 5:35:39 PM PST by nickcarraway (www.terrisfight.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Let us see who will win the race. Will it be:

a) Russia turning into the USSR?

Or;

b) The USA turning into the USSA (United Socialist States of America)?

My bet would be on the USA-USSA transition happening before any Soviet Bloc re-emergence.

4 posted on 02/12/2004 5:39:16 PM PST by spetznaz (Nuclear missiles: The ultimate Phallic symbol.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
I guess I would too if my country had gone from superpower status and having the 1st or 2nd largest military in the world to 3rd rate status. If it wasn't for Russia's nukes, they'd never get any attention.
5 posted on 02/12/2004 5:40:04 PM PST by COEXERJ145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Not surprising. KGB thug, control freak, corrupt to the core. The guy's a commie through and through -- always has been, always will be.
6 posted on 02/12/2004 5:41:44 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
I guess I would too if my country had gone from superpower status and having the 1st or 2nd largest military in the world to 3rd rate status.

That's how I took it too. I wouldn't read too much into it.

7 posted on 02/12/2004 5:43:06 PM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway; Finalapproach29er; spetznaz; COEXERJ145; Mr. Mojo; Ichneumon; RussianConservative
Where is lamenting a disaster seen as supporting the USSR? The fall caused death and destruction and loss of populations and wealth for Russia. George Soros like spin on Putin's words by abcNews to make him look like Darth Vader. Just earlier the news was spinning that Putin made his enemies vanish when they were on vacation visiting a mistress or something. Something sinister is up here. I have had a few years experiance in the intel-info business and I can see an organized campagin being born a mile away...for what purpose? Who is looking to place a block between the Americans and Russians?
8 posted on 02/12/2004 6:03:15 PM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Destro
The way he phrased it, at least in this translation, makes it see like supporting the USSR.
9 posted on 02/12/2004 6:07:46 PM PST by nickcarraway (www.terrisfight.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Showing true colors. What can be seen by looking into his eyes *now* ?
10 posted on 02/12/2004 6:08:12 PM PST by GOP_1900AD (Un-PC even to "Conservatives!" - Right makes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz
My guess is that Russia will turn into the 4th Reich before we turn into anything else....
11 posted on 02/12/2004 6:09:15 PM PST by GOP_1900AD (Un-PC even to "Conservatives!" - Right makes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
He's also an ace thief of Western technology ... Google about his time in Dresden, helping out Robotron.
12 posted on 02/12/2004 6:10:13 PM PST by GOP_1900AD (Un-PC even to "Conservatives!" - Right makes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz
Back in the USSA...
13 posted on 02/12/2004 6:10:29 PM PST by Luke Skyfreeper (Michael <a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com/index_real.php">miserable failure</a>Moore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
The No. 1 tragedy of the USSR is the legalization of abortion on demand in 1920. The USSR was the first major nation-state to legalize abortion. Russia is going down the tubes as of "right now" because it's population growth is practically negative. Abortion continues unabated in the former USSR, with more abortions than live births.
14 posted on 02/12/2004 6:30:41 PM PST by BrucefromMtVernon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
The No. 1 tragedy of the USSR is the legalization of abortion on demand in 1920. The USSR was the first major nation-state to legalize abortion. Russia is going down the tubes as of "right now" because it's population growth is practically negative. Abortion continues unabated in the former USSR, with more abortions than live births.
15 posted on 02/12/2004 6:30:50 PM PST by BrucefromMtVernon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: belmont_mark; Destro
My guess is that Russia will turn into the 4th Reich before we turn into anything else....

Hmmmm....i don't know about that. What Putin said was a mix of pre-election rhetoric and poignant reminiscing of the past days when Russia was mega-powerful. Making something on the level of a USSR re-incarnation would be hard, especially on the short-term, and would take more than words.

However we (the US) are rapidly moving toward becoming socialist in nature and psyche. And it is not a Democrat thing ....nope. BOTH PARTIES are equal partners, with the difference being that our guys, the Repubs, are taking the scenic route compared to the Dems fast-and-straight route. The Dems would get us there faster, but the Repubs will get us there nontheless. We basically have to chose between the tortoise and the hare, and there are no viable third choices (any choice apart from those 2 is laughable, and the Dems are obviously a no-no, hence we are left with the best choice ....relatively (with emphasis) ....which is the Repubs).

Hence i would say the USSA will come long before the USSR re-emerges, if the CCCP even comes back to life . In my opinion what will happen is that Russia will become wealthier and more democratic (yeah, i know of the Oligarchs, and i know Putin has made some decisions that make some people uncomfortable, but in the intermediate run ...less than a decade ...it will be wealthier and more democratic). Instead of a Soviet Bloc 'ala' USSR we will have a strong Russia which will be more USA than USSR. And i hope that is the case because, if we are still the Ol' US of A, we will need a strong democratic Russia to help us against a neo-superpower China (or mroe likely Chinese-bloc).

Again ...hopefully we will still be the United States of America and not the United Socialist States of America.

Hopefully.

16 posted on 02/12/2004 6:30:55 PM PST by spetznaz (Nuclear missiles: The ultimate Phallic symbol.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
The No. 1 tragedy of the USSR is the legalization of abortion on demand in 1920. The USSR was the first major nation-state to legalize abortion. Russia is going down the tubes as of "right now" because it's population growth is practically negative. Abortion continues unabated in the former USSR, with more abortions than live births.
17 posted on 02/12/2004 6:31:07 PM PST by BrucefromMtVernon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: montag813
ping
18 posted on 02/12/2004 6:34:17 PM PST by spetznaz (Nuclear missiles: The ultimate Phallic symbol.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BrucefromMtVernon; Mr. Mojo
Actually, you should know, Putin banned abortion in Russia.
19 posted on 02/12/2004 6:35:13 PM PST by spetznaz (Nuclear missiles: The ultimate Phallic symbol.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Destro
No conspiracy, direct quote from his speech. Russians have a history of expansionism (forced). This kind of talk worries people. Russia isn't going to be crippled forever.
20 posted on 02/12/2004 6:43:12 PM PST by Finalapproach29er ("Don't shoot Mongo, you'll only make him mad.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson