Ordinary civilians who feel a need to have guns are clearly paranoid.
Posted on 02/10/2004 3:05:04 PM PST by King Prout
It is as sure as the tides: In any gun discussion, sooner or later, someone will feel obliged to suggest that desiring to be free to choose to be armed implies paranoia.
I can - and do - easily counter this silly digression into armchair psychoanalysis (merely asking any who suggest this "You wear a seatbelt when you are in a vehicle... does this make you paranoid?") but I am left to wonder... is there a term for the polar opposite of "paranoia"?
Paranoia is defined as "a mental disorder typified by an irrational belief that one is being persecuted, often accompanied by delusions of grandeur." Clinical paranoia is a medically diagnosable dementia often closely associated with schizophrenia - where there is a clear disconnect in the patient's mind between his perceptions of reality and the reality a sane person perceives. It is believed to be commonly caused by psychological trauma, but can be brought on by indoctrination, chemical induction, and neural trauma. In common discourse, the term "paranoia" is often used colloquially (if a tad too freely) to mean "an habitual tendency to mistrust and suspect others of malice or of intending harm."
Now, though I don't know what to call it, I know very well that an opposite dementia surely exists, and it can be defined thusly: "A mental disorder typified by an irrational belief that one is either immune to (or will never be the target of) persecution, often accompanied by delusions of unworth or a religious mania revolving around some notional "universally held intrinsic value of every life" - such belief projected upon all others." The clinical version of this bizarre contrary-to-fact mindset may be a dementia closely associated with schizophrenia. I am not aware that this dementia has been clinically studied, so I cannot state what its etiology might be (though I suspect prolonged indoctrination and a very sheltered life might play a common and significant role). Similar to the vulgar use of "paranoia," in common discourse the term for this clinical condition could be used colloquially (if a tad too freely) to mean "an habitual tendency to overly trust others and ascribe to them nearly angelic benevolence or inherently good intentions."
In the realest of real terms - aggregate body counts through recorded history - at least two orders of magnitude more people have wound up face-down dead in a ditch through the latter failure of imagination than have through the former. Thus, again in real terms, paranoia of both the clinical and casual varieties is LESS INSANE than the clinical and casual flavors of trusting too damned much.
What follows are some very basic guideposts of real-world reality:
Reality check#1: There is always crime, given enough humans living in the same region over enough time. Some of this crime is violent. Some of this crime is lethal.
Reality check#2: There are always natural imbalances between individuals in respect to native physical power and aggression. Such imbalances for many reasons often lead to rapacity, or a predatory pattern of attitudes and behaviors, on the part of the strong and aggressive and at the expense of the weak and retiring.
Reality check#3: Agents of the government cannot be surely relied upon to intervene in the course of an ongoing violent criminal act. Even if those agents and the government itself are to be implicitly trusted as paragons of virtue (you may laugh now, if you wish... I shall)... AND assuming for the nonce that such agents are under legal obligation to put themselves at risk in order to prevent or halt a crime (they are not, at least not in the USA), there is absolutely no reliable method to summon them to the rescue for them to be guaranteed to be there in enough numbers, with enough force, and in a short enough time, to prevent a criminal perpetrator from committing whatever horrid act he so desires upon an unarmed and unaided victim. The results of a violent criminal encounter are usually decided within 10 seconds after the initiation of the event. Barring telepathy and teleportation, don't expect shepherds to rescue you when the wolf comes through your door.
Reality check#4: It is the nature of a ruling body to stay in power and to expand the reach and depth of its power. The host body - the common citizens - are ALWAYS at risk of being treated as and reduced to serfs.
If your perception of reality does not match these four basic summaries of all human history, you may wish to seek professional psychological counselling, as you are very definitely showing signs of suffering from the (far-less-sane-than-mere-paranoia) dementia I have postulated above.
On the other hand: If your perception of reality, like mine, is in full agreement with the guides above, do as I do - own and carry, and resist any nanny-state attempt to render you weak and helpless prey.
speaking of which, and shame on me...
Ladies? Y'all might find this entertaining and/or useful. Please ping anyone I forgot who you think would like this.
projection \pre-jek-shen\ noun (1557)
6 b : the attribution of one's own ideas, feelings, or attitudes to other people or to objects; esp : the externalization of blame, guilt, or responsibility as a defense against anxiety
(C) Merriam-Webster, Incorporated
That's it! You are absolutely correct. They are not "afraid" of guns, they "hate" guns.
The case is specific though, so there is no mistake about what the projection implies. The paranoia, I would say is mixed with some rational fear, because some of them know damn well they intend dictatorship. The 'toon family, Feinsteins, Daleys, Schumers, ect know this. Her ankleness is a domestic waiting to happen. She's the one that was on the tube ranting about the vast right wing conspiracy. That's a blatent display of paranoia. She's also the one that was on the tube whining in a screaming, shrill and otherwise extremely obnoxious voice, "I'm sick and tired of...blaming this admin...blah, blah, blah". Crazy _itch! Hysterical personality if ever their was one.
Anyway the only fear and paranoia is in their minds, not the ones they are trying to disarm. The ones they are trying to disarm have a firm grasp on reality.
It was Colonel Jeff Cooper who first observed the strange doings of the hoplophobes, perhaps at a time when that disturbed malady was more common than outright hatred. Later, the late Finnish researcher and writer P.T. Kekkonen more accurately noted the change in the weather. Certainly one term or the other may apply in some cases, and both in others, sadly more common now.
But whether or not such distressed creatures should be allowed the full range of responsibilities as those of us in more complete command of our emotions and psyches seems unreasonable; certainly they should not be entrusted with public offices until they've been treated and hopefully cured. But it's clear that many of our public policies come from sources that are emotionally or mentally disabled or corrupt, and this would seem to be one common likely source.
I just refined the term a little and pointed out examples of where it's certainly applicable.
-archy-/-
Ordinary civilians who feel a need to have guns are clearly paranoid.
Define "They".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.