Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Was Bush AWOL? Democrats Attack...and a Retired Naval Reserve Officer Responds
Hobbs Online ^ | 2/3/0 | William H. "Bill" Hobbs / Steve Houpt

Posted on 02/04/2004 9:22:13 PM PST by Valin

In recent days, Democrats have ratcheted up their attacks on President Bush, using the slanderous lie that Bush was "AWOL" or a "deserter" from his service in the Texas Air National Guard back in the early 1970s.

Democratic National Committee Chairman Terry McAulliffe says George W. Bush "never served in our military in our country," although, clearly, Bush did.

Former Sen. Max Cleland, who ought to know better, is telling a lie about Bush's service, claiming "Bush was AWOL and was kicked out of the Alabama National Guard." Neither part of Cleland's statement is true.

And Sen. John Kerry, current front-runner for the Democratic presidential nomination, reportedly has not decided whether or not he'll use the "Bush AWOL" charge in a campaign against President Bush.

The media is now re-examining the story, though, and the Bush-haters are quite happy about it. As this story in today's Washington Post indicates, there is plenty of evidence Bush was not AWOL from his Guard duties. Indeed, one of the foundational pieces of the Bush-haters' lie is the failure of a colonel in Alabama to recall Bush ever being on post.

White House communications director Dan Bartlett said yesterday that although no official record has been found, "obviously, you don't get an honorable discharge unless you receive the required points for annual service." He said Bush "specifically remembers" performing some of his duties in Alabama. Bartlett also provided a news clipping from 2000 quoting friends of Bush's from the Alabama Senate campaign saying they recalled Bush leaving for Guard duty on occasion. Bush said in 2000 that he did "show up for drills. I made most monthly meetings, and when I missed them I made them up."

Reached in Montgomery yesterday, Turnipseed stood by his contention that Bush never reported to him. But Turnipseed added that he could not recall if he, himself, was on the base much at that time.

If Turnipseed wasn't there much of the time, he's less likely to have encountered Bush. And if Turnipseed was on post much of the time but now, 30-plus years later, as an old man, doesn't remember being there, well... he is not a reliable witness.

I've extensively documented Bush's service and rebutted the Bush AWOL lie, in a series of posts you can access here. I'm not going to rehash them here except to say the facts are simple: George W. Bush volunteered for service in a military unit a part of which was at that very time involved in combat in Vietnam. He learned how to fly a combat aircraft, was a highly regarded pilot, served more time than his Texas Air National Guard contract required, and was honorably discharged.

This post is to share with you a long email I received from Steve Houpt, a retired member of the U.S. Naval Reserve. I post it here with minimal editing for typos, clarity and presentation, including replacing some acronyms with the complete organization titles.

This is too long to put in your comments section and I have no desire to start a blog. If any of this info is of any use now or in the future, feel free to use it in your blog if you desire, but you have the myth [lies] about Bush’s Air National Guard service very well covered. 1. I have worked at the Naval Reserve Headquarters in New Orleans on two different occasions [1980-1986 and 1989-1992] and have had to deal with reserve attendance in units I was assigned. Changes all the time, but it should be similar from ANG to Naval Reserve to Air Force Reserve. I also am aware of 30 year old paperwork trails. [No computers]. Reserve components have different options when someone does not drill (or is excused). We excused people from obligations all the time depending on situations. I am not aware of "court martialing" anyone. GWB was "transferred" from a unit referred to as a "hardware unit" [flying aircraft] in Texas to a "non hardware unit" in Alabama. Sounds like it was for administrative purposes. Working on a Senate campaign. No airplanes. Sounds like "excused" or "unexcused" absence. We did it all the time and who knows where paperwork is from 30 years ago. And remember, we were in a "paper" system back then.

We would transfer people to non drill units for paper work. I know GWB was under a "6 year obligation", but so what. You have two options if he really was AWOL. You activate him (and that costs active duty money) or you give him unsat. No one has any proof of what actually happened 30 years ago. Every story I have read is based from basically one story and it takes on a life of its own from there.

2. A myth has grown in this country that no Guard or Reserve served in Vietnam. Yes, the Guard was "safer" than being drafted. But we have a "Guard and Reserve" for a reason. If everyone enlisted in the active Army in 1968, we would have had to draft people into the Guard and Reserve. The draft fills ANY vacancies in the armed services. It is not an ARMY draft. It just happens that 99% of those vacancies during Vietnam were in Army infantry units.

Many Guards and Reserves served. My civilian boss from 1989-92, James G. Pirie USNR CAPT [ret], was a Naval Reserve LCDR who was shot down over North Vietnam in 1967 while flying an A-4. He was in same Naval program I was in, the Training and Administration of Reserves [TAR] program.

Draft dodgers went to Canada. I avoided the draft by enlisting in the Naval Reserve in 1971 and had to serve three years active duty because I already had my draft notice to report before I was actually sworn in. I did my three years and stayed an extra 23 years on active duty in the Navy TAR program. The draft was how the NAVY, MARINES, AIR FORCE, RESERVES and GUARD stayed at 100% [with few recruiters] and could actually pick and choose.

Tell these Guard and Reserve members why they went the "safe" route:

Colorado ANG - The POW display is on loan from former POW Gobel James, who spent five years at the infamous Hanoi Hilton. Two other Air National Guard pilots, Major Clyde Seiler and Captain Perry Jefferson, are also honored. Seiler, 38, of Aurora, died in March 1969 when his F-100 Super Sabre was shot down during a strafing run in South Vietnam. Like most National Guardsmen, Seiler had a “day job.” He was a pilot for Continental Airlines. Jefferson was 37 when an observation aircraft he was riding in with a forward air controller failed to return from its mission in Vietnam. Jefferson was also assigned to fly F-100s for the Colorado ANG. While he died in April 1969, he was listed as missing in action for nearly 12 years.

The 1960s panel features a painting called “Vietnam Scramble,” with pilots of the 120th Tactical Fighter Squadron, CANG, running for their F-100 fighter jets on Phan Rang airbase in Vietnam.

The Air National Guard in Vietnam - Eleven squadrons were called up in January 1968 in response to the seizing of the U.S. Navy ship Pueblo by North Korea, and two tactical fighter squadrons were, the 166th (Ohio) and the 127th (Kansas) were sent to South Korea.

In May 1968 one aeromedical airservice group and two tactical fighter groups were federalized.

Four tactical fighter squadrons - the 120th (Colorado), 174th (Iowa), 188th (New Mexico), and 136th (New York) - deployed to Vietnam. And although not a Guard unit, the Guard can claim credit for a fifth squadron, the 3755th: 85 percent of this tactical fighter squadron's personnel were Air Guard volunteers from New Jersey and the District of Columbia.

More on ANG in Vietnam - In response to the first presidential order, the ANG mobilized 9,343 personnel on 25 January 1968. The President mobilized and additional 1,333 Air Guardsmen on 13 May.

Prior to their return home in April 1969, they flew 24,124 sortie and 38,614 combat hours. Those numbers rose to approximately 30,000 sorties and 50,000 combat hours if the predominantly Air Guard 355th was included. Two ANG fighter squadrons and their F-100Cs were dispatched to Korea in the summer of 1968 to replace the Air Force units that had been rushed there during the Pueblo crisis.

Air Guard volunteers also supported Air Force operations in Southeast Asia. The first sizable ANG airlift involvement began in 1965. They flew regularly to SEA until 1972. Between August 1965 and September, Air Guard domestic and offshore aero medical evacuation flights freed active duty Air Force resources for such missions in SEA. In July 1970, two EC-121 "Super Constellations" from Pennsylvania's 193rd Tactical Electronic Warfare Squadron departed their home station for Korea, Thailand. During the next six months, about 60 Guardsmen were rotated through the latter installation on 30 to 60 day tours in Operation "Commando Buzz," Their aircraft served as flying radar stations and airborne control platforms for U.S. air operations in SEA until January 1971.

Navy League - With the decision of the nation's leaders not to commit Reserve units to the war in Vietnam, only a small percentage of the Medals of Honor awarded went to members of the Reserve components: Three Naval Reserve and two Marine Corps Reserve personnel received the award during that long struggle.

Naval Air Reserve Squadron's VAQ-208/308 - These reserve squadrons were not mobilized but “VAQ-308 along with its later formed sister squadron, VAQ-208, established a new precedence by flying combat support missions in S.E. Asia during the Vietnam War with civilian reservists (not recalled to Active Duty) during short leaves of absence from their civilian occupations.”

Army Reserve History - Vietnam Conflict - 5,900 Army Reserve soldiers are mobilized.

Air Force Reserve, 349th - A recall to active duty was again initiated on January 26, 1968 for the Vietnam War, and many hundreds of tons of cargo were carried across the Pacific. Upon deactivation in 1969, the 349th moved to Travis Air Force Base, California, and became the second "associate" Wing in what was then the Military Airlift Command.

Steve Houpt Senior Chief Av Elect Technician [ret] USNR [TAR].


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: ang; awol; bush43; bushrecord; deserter; georgebush
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
These re-visited W AWOL stories are nothing more than a message.."Let's leave this alone during the general".

Kerry has way more to lose than President Bush over the whole military service thing.

Even if Rove were to use it, the left will simply say the "right" is bringing up old issues...blah...

Bottom line, Kerry may have served in Vietanm (did anyone know that???!!!!) but his demeanor afterwords speaks volumes; against him.

21 posted on 02/04/2004 11:15:27 PM PST by Michael Barnes ( <a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com">miserable failure </a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Valin
This is hillarious. Kerry et al are attempting to smoke President Bush into reacting to these absurd allegations.

They need some reaction from him to keep pounding away at him because they have nothing.

Why doesn't the media ask this question of Kerry and the dems: Why are they so concerned with Vietnam. That was a disasterous democrat war and not applicable to the current situation. Leadership is not predicated on military service. If that were true, every president from Taft through FDR should not have been president. The next President in history with no military service was WJ Clinton.

But of course, the media whores never ask questions.
22 posted on 02/04/2004 11:35:20 PM PST by OpusatFR (Hillary's health care means culling the herd to keep down costs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette; All
Actually, there was a Hillary shill (Wolfson), who spilled the real reason they are attacking Bush with the AWOL stuff. Hannity ask him about the charge, and Wolfson said, "well, the republicans started it with the carrier landing". Can't you just hear some little kid saying WELL YOU STARTED IT!

The goal is to taint the carrier landing to the point President Bush will be afraid to use the video in his campaign. Wow! They are so afraid of that video, they are willing to tell lies about the President. Sooooo, how many other lies are they willing to tell ..?? Never mind .. don't answer that!
23 posted on 02/05/2004 12:20:50 AM PST by CyberAnt (The Election in 2004 - it's for the SOUL of AMERICA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: claudiustg
But there was a transfer to Alabama. This is where Turnipseed says he never saw Bush .. but then he says he wasn't there himself .. which causes me to wonder if he knows what he's talking about. Evidently, Bush has records .. which he may now release and shut the smear down.
24 posted on 02/05/2004 12:30:58 AM PST by CyberAnt (The Election in 2004 - it's for the SOUL of AMERICA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: gatorbait
No source .. no claim!!
25 posted on 02/05/2004 12:33:59 AM PST by CyberAnt (The Election in 2004 - it's for the SOUL of AMERICA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: unix
"Rove will use it"

What ..?? President Bush will decide if it gets used or not, and Rove will not have anything to say about it.
26 posted on 02/05/2004 12:38:16 AM PST by CyberAnt (The Election in 2004 - it's for the SOUL of AMERICA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Valin; All
-The Real Military Record of George W. Bush: Not Heroic, but Not AWOL, Either-The Original Story--
27 posted on 02/05/2004 1:52:28 AM PST by backhoe (The Clintons destroyed the democRat party- they just haven't laid down yet...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin
The commentary ( click on source ) is the usual back & forth, but here's the kicker:

Why I don't think it's a big deal in three simple steps:

1 - the Air Force didn't think it was a big deal back in the day and they were a lot closer to the problem than we are. So if it was good enough for them it's good enough for me.

2 - he received an Honorable Discharge. An Honorable Discharge means you completed your service and performed honorably, meeting or exceeding the standards of performance and conduct. It cannot be awarded anyone who was AWOL or had an Unauthorized Absence prior to being discharged - that's a fact of military life. So if the Air Force didn't have a problem with his service and they saw fit to award him an Honorable Discharge, what's the big deal?

3 - most of the people who are suddenly so interested in GWB's service and wether he served his commitment to the armed forces are the same people who normally spit on the armed forces. I find their sudden concern for those wear the uniform (and those of us who have worn the uniform) to be slightly disconcerting and more than a tad disingenuous.

Posted by: Robert Modean at February 4, 2004 12:40 PM
28 posted on 02/05/2004 3:36:17 AM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kozak
But on the brighter side, since THEY decided to refight Vietnam....

If only we could..........sigh

29 posted on 02/05/2004 3:55:37 AM PST by bullseye1911 (IQ deemed to be somewhere between an idiot-savant and Marilyn Savant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Valin

KerryNotASoldier_1.jpg
KerryNotASoldier_2.jpg(61K)
KerryNotASoldier_3.jpg(60K)
KerryNotASoldier_4.jpg(60K)
KerryNotASoldier_4.jpg(59K)

In 1971 George W. Bush was wearing the uniform with pride and serving his country and supporting the troops.

In that same year, 1971, Kerry was desecrating our flag, called our troops baby killers, and was openly siding with our enemy.

30 posted on 02/05/2004 3:58:32 AM PST by ChadGore (Viva Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin

31 posted on 02/05/2004 3:58:59 AM PST by ChadGore (Viva Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gatorbait
Why does any of this matter anyway? According to Terry McAwful and John F'n Kerry, the National Guard isn't even part of our military!
32 posted on 02/05/2004 4:01:48 AM PST by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rintense
(remembering the '60s)

When the number thing came up, those who got a number that would mean a draft did all sorts of things to avoid it. A friend's boyfriend avoided the certainty of VietNam by his father's connections being used to get him a CoastGuard slot. The connections? His father was an Army recruiter!!

Another way to avoid the certainty of ground battle was to join the Navy. There were greater odds of avoiding direct shooting.

The very rich and the very bright got exemptions for graduate school. Those who could stand it and could do some Math and/or Science got exemptions to teach those subjects. Those who felt strongly enough risked their citizenship and abiltiy to return by leaving the US. The truly sleazy got bogus physical deferrments and then got into everyone's face with it by spending the war skiing in Aspen.

Another way to put off immediate time in the war was to join the National Guard or Reserves. Those slots were hard to come by, since they were in fact used as a delay tactic by many. Many opted for pilot training when they did that.

I knew two guys who signed up for ROTC for the pilot program...they knew there was a risk but they wanted to be pilots. They both ended up in the shooting war.

Senator Kerry didn't have to join; he's older than the draft system. It was a choice. He's at his best when they surround him with those he served with.

My questions with the GWB service thing are (1) did the two units he was assigned to fight in Viet Nam and (2)how common was it for those who got full pilot training to get out for grad school without the military first having them do some wartime?

I don't like this issue. World War II veterans got education, houses, and a lot of job opportunities when they returned. Since then, veterans haven't gotten their due. "Homeless veteran" should be an oxymoron. They are the ones who should be given houses, instead of subsidizing immigrants.

It's hard to convey real concern for today's veterans while dissing veterans of the past. It succeeded with McCain and that amputee Senator from the South. It's probably not a good idea to use that tactic a third time, especially since we're in a shooting war.

33 posted on 02/05/2004 4:32:53 AM PST by grania ("Won't get fooled again")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR
It'll be hard to keep it up without getting the question turned on them: Why didn't you have a problem with Bill Clinton?
34 posted on 02/05/2004 5:29:51 AM PST by OneCitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: grania
Kerry's only 60; there was a draft throughout the 1950's and 60's. Kerry isn't older than the draft system.
35 posted on 02/05/2004 5:33:16 AM PST by OneCitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
That was meant as humor.. I was hitting the "source" like where the goblin pulled the info out of ....
36 posted on 02/05/2004 5:44:56 AM PST by gatorbait (Yesterday, today and tomorrow......The United States Army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: rintense
Why does any of this matter anyway? According to Terry McAwful and John F'n Kerry, the National Guard isn't even part of our military!

That's okay, most of Kerry's witnesses had nothing to do with the military ,either. As for McAuliffe, well,think about a black hole......

37 posted on 02/05/2004 5:46:44 AM PST by gatorbait (Yesterday, today and tomorrow......The United States Army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Kozak
we should have not hesitancy in bringing forth all of Kerry's treachery following his service in Vietnam. Followed by his gutting of intelligence, and the fact he opposed every major weapon system we now depend on. This should be like shooting fish in a barrel.

While we're at it, we also need to put Kerry's "support" for Veterans' issues on the table. Hopefully the morons supporting him will suddenly realize Kerry is acting like all Dems ,say soothing things, then do nothing about the problem, except exacerbate it.

38 posted on 02/05/2004 5:49:22 AM PST by gatorbait (Yesterday, today and tomorrow......The United States Army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle
Bush/National Guard ping!
39 posted on 02/05/2004 5:53:36 AM PST by HenryLeeII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin
Bump.
40 posted on 02/05/2004 6:03:46 AM PST by Missouri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson