STATEMENT BY PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH ON THE MA SUPREME COURT RULING APPROVING GAY MARRIAGE

The White House ^ | February 4, 2004 | President George W. Bush

[Sweet_Sunflower29]

Wow; thank you SO much for posting this!!

[little jeremiah]

You're welcome. It is pretty amazing to see why the homosexuals REALLY want same sex marriage.

They have no interest in holy matrimony, til death do us part, and so on. They shamelessly admit that they want to destroy every remnant of traditional morality and change the world into their whorehouse. Sorry for the crude language, but that's the truth. They are promiscuous, they want fresh meat, and they recruit.

[backhoe]

Dave, thanks- she seemed to recover OK after resting. Scared the bejeezus out of me. And naturally, being pigheaded, she wouldn't go to the doctor. Arrgh!

[backhoe]

Meg, she recovered OK after resting a while.

Since she's too bullheaded to visit the doc, I'm left wondering what in Hell happened- reaction to medicine? Fugue state?

I guess we'll just have to wait & see.

[MEG33]

I hated to say it last night but I wondered if it could be a stroke.I failed to note my mothers symptoms when she got dizzy and fell...I did not know the symptoms.Mother had senile dementia and I just missed that this was not part of being 90.I pray things go well for you and your wife.Thanks for the update.

[backhoe]

Appreciate that- stroke was about the first thing that popped into my head, too. It's more common in young women than many people realize, in fact, that's what killed my first wife many years ago.

One problem I have is that Miss E is pighheaded- she had 3 teeth abscess in a row, and not until the third made her deathly ill was I able to get her to a dentist to pull the bloodly thing and drain the abscess. While I admire stoicism, it can be carried too far.

All I can do is wait and observe, and try to get her to the doctor is it recurs and that's a whole 'nother order of frustration in itself- our family doc is a fine physician, but after her husband divorced her for a younger woman ( ouch! ) a few years ago, she started being absent more than present at her office. Which has about 4 other doctors in it, but naturally since they are all specialists, they can't see you for mundane things. Bah!

[MEG33]

I think I have a bit of that pigheadedness about the doctor,dentist ,too.I wasn't that way when I was younger!

[backhoe]

I think I have a bit of that pigheadedness about the doctor,dentist ,too.I wasn't that way when I was younger!

I wish I could recall more accurately my Dad's quip about doctors- he lived to within a month of his 95th birthday, and he swore it was because he only saw a doctor when death was a less desireable alternative- or something like that... the old fellow had a very keen, barbed, and ironic sense of humor.

[BOBTHENAILER]

Kerry limp-wristed vis-a-vis Franken-Frank nuptials

What a cute couple.

[longtermmemmory]

It is not an implication, it is a legal guarantee. The HRC has been working to have a full faith and credit case to knock down doma since 1996.

The only legal strategy to stop homosexuals is a constitutional amendment.

Fort the leftists it is only about sex and feeeeeeeeeeelings.

[ArGee]

To file a formal complaint, a citizen needs more than the words "usuarpation of power".

I'm not in MA, fortunately, so I don't know who regulates the SC there. A SCOTUS Justice could be impeached for usurpation of power. Our Congress could do that if they had the intestinal fortitude to do that. There are many there who appreciate being able to hide behind the notion that it's SCOTUS' fault and nothing they could do about it. They can sound pro-family and not risk their seats at the same time.

I understand that the gay activists may use the "don't let the Constitution become a dictionary" argument, but even a stopped clock is right twice a day. What else should we define in the Constitution? The definition of man and woman for restroom designations? It is an issue today.

I don't mean to be facetious and I would support the ammendment. But I would be much happier if the various and sundry legislatures would stand up for the separation of powers against the various and sundry courts.

And the various and sundry executives should start naming the names of those they feel need to go and on what charges.

I can hear Senator NoCojones saying, "Now, let's not be hasty young shireling. Hroom, Hroom."

Shalom.

[ArGee]

I disagree ... the President should not be in the business of advocating the impeachment of judges ...

It is a valid point of contention. I would say that, under normal circumstances you would be right. But when the behavior of the judges is egregious enough, and the behavior of the legislature is wimpy enough, I would stand behind a President naming names.

I realize this did not happen in Federal court, but directing the legislature to write a law is egregious enough in my book. It's a direct attempt to declare oligarchy.

Shalom.

[Coleus]

`

[Van Jenerette]

...Let's see if he stands by that position now, or checks the polls and flip-flops again...

From what I have seen of Kerry, he will flip-flip-flip, anyway he can. Remember...he touts himself as a decorated 'war-hero' but leaves out the part where he threw those decorations back over the Whitehouse wall.

I'd put my money on FLIP...

Vandon

P.S. Katherine and Christian and many of my students from the college went to meet Pres. Bush in Charleston yesterday...many students converted from brainwashed liberals into clear thinking Republican's on the spot! Ahhh...the road to the Whitehouse runs through the Old South after all!

[votelife]

I disagree. Even if never implemented a national debate over marraiage will show the country how the left has used the courts to implement their liberal social agenda. This will make it easier for Bush to put more Scalia's on the court.

[votelife]

I agree; would love to see Bush announce WMDs in September and a push for a ban on gay marriage.

For those who say he's politicizing national security. Well, the longer Bush can hold out on WMDs (if he has them) its probably easier to get more info.

[Van Jenerette]

I agree; would love to see Bush announce WMDs in September and a push for a ban on gay marriage.

GAY MARRIAGE is a WEAPON of MASS DESTRUCTION
(for any society stupid enough to allow it)

�