Posted on 02/03/2004 6:22:24 PM PST by RJCogburn
American soldiers are dying at a rate of more than one a day in Iraq, despite some commanders' recent claims to have broken the back of the insurgency.
The toll in January was 45 - five more than in December - despite hopes that deposed President Saddam Hussein's capture would stop the killings from roadside bombs and other attacks.
The number of deaths in January will rise to 47 when the Pentagon changes the status of two soldiers who are missing and believed to have died in the Tigris River on Jan. 25. That would make the second highest monthly total since last April when daily combat from the U.S.-led invasion was under way.
All told, 528 U.S. troops have died in the war, including three so far this month. The worst month was November, when 82 died. In October there were 43, September had 30, August 35.
Of 39 deaths in January that the Army attributed to hostile action, 23 involved attacks with homemade bombs, which the military calls "improvised explosive devices," and which have been the insurgents' weapon of choice, according to a review of Pentagon casualty reports.
The Army has put great emphasis on defeating the threat from homemade bombs, often detonated along roadways used by Army convoys. Usually a remotely transmitted signal sets them off.
To counter the threat, more soldiers are using Humvee utility vehicles with extra armor, and troops are wearing an improved version of body armor that provides more protection against bomb shrapnel. Some vehicles also are equipped now with devices that jam the electronic signal used to detonate the bombs.
Most of the attackers are thought to be remnants of the Baath Party that ruled Iraq under Saddam for more than three decades, although some may be foreign terrorists.
When U.S. troops captured Saddam near his hometown of Tikrit on Dec. 13, some thought that would take the punch out of the resistance. By early January, U.S. commanders were publicly emphasizing that the number of attacks on U.S. troops had declined, as had hostile deaths.
Maj. Gen. Charles H. Swannack Jr., commander of the 82nd Airborne Division, told reporters on Jan. 6 that "we've turned the corner" in the counterinsurgency effort in his area of responsibility, the western part of Iraq, which includes a part of the "Sunni Triangle" west of Baghdad.
The number of attacks on his forces had declined by almost 60 percent in the past month, he said then.
Two weeks later, Maj. Gen. Raymond Odierno, commander of the 4th Infantry Division, said, "The former regime elements we've been combating have been brought to their knees." His troops operate in an area north of Baghdad that includes Tikrit, a focus of anti-U.S. violence.
But in fact, many of the fatal attacks against U.S. forces in January were in Swannack's and Odierno's areas. On Jan. 24, for example, three soldiers from Swannack's force were killed in an improvised explosive device attack in the town of Khalidiyah, east of Ramadi, in the Sunni Triangle. Three days later, another such attack near the same town killed three more soldiers. Still another who was severely wounded in the same attack died in a hospital two days later.
On Jan. 31, three soldiers from Odierno's 4th Infantry Division were killed when their vehicle was hit by an improvised explosive device while traveling in a convoy in the city of Kirkuk.
The depth and effectiveness of the insurgency is difficult to measure with only statistics, which tend to fluctuate over time. It appeared a few weeks ago that many U.S. commanders had hoped the dropoff in guerrilla action would usher in a less violent period for U.S. troops.
That has not happened.
In an eight-day span, Jan. 9 to Jan. 16, only three American soldiers died, and two from nonhostile causes.
But in the two weeks after that, 26 died - all but three in hostile action.
L. Paul Bremer, U.S. civilian administrator of Iraq, said Tuesday he still believes security has improved.
"I think the situation has improved importantly since the capture of Saddam Hussein," he said.
In the four weeks after Saddam's capture, the number of insurgent attacks against American troops throughout Iraq did fall to an average of 18 per day from 23 per day in the preceding four weeks.
But on Tuesday, Brig. Gen. Mark Kimmitt, deputy chief of operations for the U.S. military in Baghdad, told reporters that the daily average had climbed back to 23 in the past week.
Attacks against Iraqis also are on the rise, although it is not clear that all those are related directly to the insurgency. The two near-simultaneous suicide bombings in the northern city of Irbil on Sunday, for example, killed 101 people, U.S. military officials said Tuesday, including top Kurdish political figures.
I've read that total US service deaths in WWII were about 404,000. Sixteen million men were mobilized throughout the war.
Majuere Since Jan 31, 2004
What are you doing to ensure that we don't lose a life per day in D.C. or L.A. or N.Y., or don't you care about these lives?
How could an evil tryant like Sadam exist if the people he tyranized truly wanted freedom, and were willing to die to secure it? He could not. Since the Iraquis were not willing to die to secure freedom for themselves, why should any American have to die to secure it for them?
Hank
I hate to burst your bubble but most of our troops believe that what they did was a good thing. Why don't you offer to go and assist with digging up some of those mass graves over there. View the sad site of seeing entire families, infants included, buried often alive. Talk to the families, most have had a family member taken away for years or who has never returned at all. Yes, God Bless our troops. They freed a nation that from a leader who would put your family to death and charge you for the ammunition.
Ahhhh....another disruptor.
Yanking our troops out will bring about exactly what you fear. The people of Iraq need a model for a democratic republic. Seeing our soldiers every day willing to die for them, and willing to work hard to help them rebuild what Sadaam destroyed is showing the people of Iraq what FREE PEOPLE look like.
There are many terrorists who have come to Iraq to intimidate the citizens of that country because the people who support the terrorists don't WANT there to be a free country in the middle of the tyrannies around it. I believe the people of Iraq are beginning to understand this, and are going to help our soldiers root these people out because they DO like the taste of freedom; something they've not experienced in many years, if ever.
Sure, it is all just us, just in Iraq, if we'd just leave everything would be peaches.
The above represents 20 minutes using Google, the tip of the iceberg. As far down as you want to drill you will find more and more. Anybody in the media keeping a daily running count? Didn't think so.
Would the United States be able to make that level of sacrifice in this era? I wonder...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.