Posted on 01/29/2004 5:54:35 PM PST by Jim Robinson
Will Bush solve the illegal immigration problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the government spending problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the campaign finance problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the drug war problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the nation's education problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the so-called healthcare problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the so-called environmental problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the social security problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the medicare problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush defend America from those bent on destroying her? You'd better bet your sweet bippy he will.
Will any of the Democrats defend America? Hell no they won't. They'd rather turn us over to the U.N. They'd surrender to the French Foreign Legion if given the chance.
Will Bush appoint conservative judges? Yup!
Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, appoint conservative judges? Yeah, right. And hell will freeze over tomorrow.
Will Bush continue reducing taxes? Yup.
Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, raise your taxes as soon as they possibly can if given the opportunity and continue raising them until hell freezes over? Yup.
Will Bush defend the right to life? Check
Will Bush defend marriage between a man a woman? Check
Will Bush defend the right to keep and bear arms? Check
Will Bush say no to Kyoto? Check.
Will Bush say no to a world court? Check.
Will Bush say no to the U.N.? Check.
Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, remove our national sovereignty and subjugate America to world government? Just as quickly as they possibly can if given the opportunity.
Will any other person be elected to the Presidency in 2004 other than Bush (God willing) or a Democrat? Obviously not.
Doesn't make a lick of sense to me to allow the America hating, freedom hating Democrats back into power now that we've kicked them out.
Say yes to sovereignty for America and continued freedom for all Americans.
Say no to the RATS!!
"Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, and you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost." - John Quincy Adams
Sorry Jim, you can convince the flock of sheep here to vote for Bush. But my vote's going to the Constitution Party.
(Don't they have TV up there?)
I called this congress the "no-excuses congress" because the RP finally got what they have been whining for for about 40 years. WH, HOR, Senate... now they claim they need a filibuster-proof Senate to really get the job done. Funny how the Dems somehow managed to push socialism as far as they have without all the things the RP is asking for. Why not, give them the 60 senators they need and I will look forward to the creative excuses they will come up with for not rolling back govt.
Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.
I thought Jim's post was fine, had good substance. And by my count 35 of the initial 50 posts offered nothing more than a ping to other posters, a generic statement of support, or stale references to Democrats. So perhaps 90% was an overstatement - 70% is more appropriate.
Not exactly penetrating analysis on the part of respondents...hence the reason this thread is short. I'm not supporting or criticizing that fact, I'm just stating what is.
Next you'll be demanding to "zee hiss papers."
A debate and discussion can be had without insults and insinuations.
Maybe YOU think that we managed to live through Clinton's two terms, with little to no effects. That is utterly and completely incorrect!
Since you are more used to a SOCIALISTIC government, obviously, you speak out of both sides of your mouth quite easily.This isn't Canada.Neither is there any guarantee that the GOP would keep majorities in both Houses, with a Bush loss. With a Dem president and a complacent Senate, Supreme Court Judgeship nominations ( a VITAL thing to think about ! )are something even YOU should have problems with.
You have rotten political instincts! Jeb will not,CAN NOT, be the GOP's nominee in '08! You don't " get it ", but you can bet the manse ( if you had one ) that the RNC knows this.
You're a Libertarian. GO find a Libertarian site to post to.
How close do you think the election is?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.