Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clark Ran Afoul of His Bosses While NATO Commander Because He Was Less Than Forthcoming
Prnewswire ^ | Sunday January 25, 9:57 am ET

Posted on 01/25/2004 7:20:46 AM PST by Brian Mosely

Press Release

Source: Newsweek

NEWSWEEK: Clark Ran Afoul of His Bosses While NATO Commander Because He Was Less Than Forthcoming, A Knowledgeable Source Says

Sunday January 25, 9:57 am ET

Clark Insists: 'The Buck Usually Stopped On My Desk'

# NEW YORK, Jan. 25 /PRNewswire/ -- When Gen. Hugh Shelton, former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters last September that General Wesley Clark was fired as commander of NATO because of "integrity and character issues" an uneasy pall was cast over Clark's presidential bid. Now, Newsweek has learned that Clark ran afoul of his bosses while NATO chief because he was less than forthcoming, according to a knowledgeable source.(Photo: http://www.newscom.com/cgi-bin/prnh/20040125/NYSU004 )

The problem materialized during the Kosovo war in the Spring of 1999, on morning conference calls with then Defense Secretary William Cohen and Shelton, report Assistant Managing Editor Evan Thomas and Washington Correspondent T. Trent Gegax in the February 2 issue of Newsweek (on newsstands Monday, January 26). From his NATO headquarters in Brussels, Clark wanted to wage the war more aggressively, but back in the Pentagon, Cohen and Shelton were more cautious.

They would give Clark explicit instructions on, for instance, the scale of the bombing campaign. "Clark would say, 'Uh-huh, gotcha," says Newsweek's source. But then he would pick up the phone and call [British Prime Minister] Tony Blair and [Secretary of State] Madeleine [Albright]." As Clark knew full well, Blair and Albright were more hawkish than Shelton and Cohen. After talking to the State Department and NATO allies, Clark would have a different set of marching orders, says the source, who has spoken about the matter with both Cohen and Clark. "Then, about 1 o'clock, the Defense Department would hear what Clark was up to, and Cohen and Shelton would be furious."

But Clark insists to Newsweek, "I was forthcoming. If [Cohen and Shelton] gave me an instruction, I did it. I would never have not done what they told me to do. But the truth is, they weren't in touch with the situation well enough to tell me everything to do. It's why you have the title supreme allied commander...The buck usually stopped on my desk...I had, by necessity, a certain independence. Yet no matter how many times I tried to bring Hugh Shelton and Washington to understand the allied side, it didn't compute. They just didn't see it."


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; hughshelton; nato; unfit; wesleyclark; whataweasel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: Brian Mosely
"The buck usually stopped on my desk...I had, by necessity, a certain independence."

Indepenence??? I thot generals in the field took orders from higher up like everyone else.

21 posted on 01/25/2004 7:44:56 AM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trust but Verify
fitting isnt it?

22 posted on 01/25/2004 7:45:06 AM PST by cripplecreek (.50 cal border fence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
well that kills clark.
23 posted on 01/25/2004 7:45:35 AM PST by camas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
"If [Cohen and Shelton] gave me an instruction, I did it. I would never have not done what they told me to do."

But if Cohen and Shelton didn't specifically tell him not to do something, he would do it.

24 posted on 01/25/2004 7:46:20 AM PST by rickmichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The UnVeiled Lady
With Clinton, integrity was never an issue. Power and control were though. I suspect that Clark angered Clinton and therefore got the boot. Clark could have been totally devoid of integrity, but as long as he did what Clinton wanted him to do, he was safe.
25 posted on 01/25/2004 7:48:11 AM PST by Enterprise ("You sit down. You had your say. Now I'm going to have my say.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
He hasn't been very forthcoming about what he actually did to stop Osama bin Laden while he was in a position of power (SACEUR, JCS J-3)....
26 posted on 01/25/2004 7:49:32 AM PST by jhofmann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: camas
Hah! It might fare badly among conservatives, but the dems, if anything, find such behavior attractive.
27 posted on 01/25/2004 7:51:36 AM PST by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
"Yet no matter how many times I tried to bring Hugh Shelton and Washington to understand the allied side, it didn't compute. They just didn't see it."

Oh, sure, Clark. You just knew soooo much more than Shelton. He is a clueless old geezer, isn't he, Clark? Go to hell, you elitist prick.

28 posted on 01/25/2004 7:53:43 AM PST by Future Snake Eater ("Oh boy, I can't wait to eat that monkey!"--Abe Simpson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise
As others will undoubtedly point out, if Clark has no integrity or character then he's the perfect Democrat candidate for President.

Exactly. That might be his ONLY qualification to be the Democrat candidate.

29 posted on 01/25/2004 7:54:35 AM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
If Clark has always been such an obnoxious and swarmy bastard -- it's amazing he exited Vietnam alive..

Army Officers, like himself - were frequently disposed of, by their own troops..

Semper Fi
30 posted on 01/25/2004 7:55:11 AM PST by river rat (Militant Islam is a cult, flirting with extinction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
I am very curious. As supreme commander, is it his final call what to do in war, or does he still take orders from someone else?
31 posted on 01/25/2004 8:00:20 AM PST by FirstPrinciple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
while the search for war criminals and violence continue in the balkans, clark can call it a win. seems to me that the situation isnt all that much different in iraq, yet clark calls it a miserable failure.

Actually, Iraq is significantly different. The Balkana have been in operation for years. Itaq is less than one year.

32 posted on 01/25/2004 8:01:01 AM PST by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
"I would never have not done what they told me to do."

But you would have done what they told you not to do apparantly.

"But the truth is, they weren't in touch with the situation well enough to tell me everything to do."

It doesn't matter. They are your superior officers and you were beholden to them.

"It's why you have the title supreme allied commander..."

It's not a title of royalty. It simply means you are the highest ranking military person in command of NATO forces. It gave you no power above the people you were answerable to -- Sheldon and Cohen.

"The buck usually stopped on my desk..."

Usually?

"I had, by necessity, a certain independence."

And you are selected, trained, and paid to exercise judgement commiserate with an O-10. If you didn't we might as well have put a E-2 in the job.

"Yet no matter how many times I tried to bring Hugh Shelton and Washington to understand the allied side, it didn't compute."

It's called "going native" in the State Department. You job was not to convince the ChJCS and SecDef of the goals and opinions of the snooty allied politicians, your job was to try and convince the allies to come around to U.S. goals and opinions. You gotta know who you work for. No wonder you were fired. It's amazing you got as high as you did. Being a FOB surely helped.

33 posted on 01/25/2004 8:03:57 AM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: petitfour
Albright silenced the men in the room by remarking, "I forget what an orgasm is."

Now, that's humor.

No, it explains at long last what really motivated American forgein policy for eight years...

34 posted on 01/25/2004 8:05:55 AM PST by Brian Mosely
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Trust but Verify
Since when did tongues wear hats?
35 posted on 01/25/2004 8:06:11 AM PST by monocle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: woofie
If Clark lacked integrity, how would Clinton know?
36 posted on 01/25/2004 8:18:43 AM PST by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Trust but Verify
As NATO commander, Clark told NEWSWEEK, "I wore two hats."

Well, that clears that up...

37 posted on 01/25/2004 8:19:23 AM PST by Noumenon (I don't have enough guns and ammo to start a war - but I do have enough to finish one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
He had the choice of disobeying the administration (Klinton, Albrightdim, & Co.) that got him his general's stars in the first place or disobeying his military superiors. What's a little perfumed princeling to do?
38 posted on 01/25/2004 8:22:30 AM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Visualize whirled peas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
I particularly liked it when Clark tried to start WWIII over his ego. That was a nice mark on his career.
39 posted on 01/25/2004 8:23:02 AM PST by Nov3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
Clark ordered the pilots to fly at such high altitude that they were bombing civilians. The pilots complained bitterly, even tho flying lower would have jeopardized their lives.

After the bombing of the train carrying civilians, which Clark had ordered, he blamed the pilot and said the pilot was to blame for the bombs dropping on the train.

From what I have read.......that was the final straw.

40 posted on 01/25/2004 8:30:33 AM PST by OldFriend (Always understand, even if you remain among the few)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson