[presidio9]

she sucked up to the clintoons. ( and robbed "less informed" shareholders, of course.) Give the greedy b*tch life for all I care.

Sounds to me like you have no idea what she is charged with.

[AbsoluteJustice]

I usually agree with everything you say but not in this instance. IMO she did have insider trading knowledge and dumped it before it tanked. Plain and simple. She knows it, her stock trader knew it, this iswhy he is going to testify, and Waskel knew it. All for a simple 200,000$ if my figures are correct.

This is greed. It is also a crime. This is no witch-hunt. She broke the law and now has to pay the piper, to include stock share holders.

[San Jacinto]

Sounds to me like you have no idea what she is charged with.

I have not looked up the charges because I don't care what she is charged with or what they do or do not do to her. (although I know enough to know the premise of this absurd article is a bunch of cr@p).

Whatever she is charged with, if she got a tip from the CEO and unloaded her stock based on that tip before it nosedived, she is a crook-- and a very greedy one at that.

[Orange1998]

Give the greedy b*tch life for all I care.

That is exactly why she is the mess to start with. Her attorneys are saying "why would Martha do this over small amount of money giving her wealth". She did it because she is greedy o'l *itch who could not give a damn about others. She lied to cover up her greed and for that she stands trial.

[nopardons]

Nope, it sounds like YOU don't know a damned thing about this trial , nor much, if anything at all, about the rules of the NYSE, the SEC rules regarding trading/investing, or the laws of the land.