Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: presidio9
I usually agree with everything you say but not in this instance. IMO she did have insider trading knowledge and dumped it before it tanked. Plain and simple. She knows it, her stock trader knew it, this iswhy he is going to testify, and Waskel knew it. All for a simple 200,000$ if my figures are correct.

This is greed. It is also a crime. This is no witch-hunt. She broke the law and now has to pay the piper, to include stock share holders.
11 posted on 01/23/2004 12:52:34 PM PST by AbsoluteJustice (By the time you read this 100 other Freepers will have posted what I have said here!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: AbsoluteJustice
You remind me of my wife. She KNOWS Scott Peterson killed his wife. No clues? No proof? No knowledge of how the victim died? Who needs facts. He's guilty.

If they had the proof that Martha was guilty of insider trading they would have charged her with it. Obviously the law does not mean a warm bucket of spit to you. "Lynch the bitch."

This is why our legal system does not work. Folks like you.
265 posted on 01/24/2004 12:26:25 PM PST by mercy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson