Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

So you think George W. Bush is not a conservative?
SOTU transcript ^ | 1/22/04

Posted on 01/22/2004 7:07:09 AM PST by Wolfstar

ED. NOTE: On Tuesday evening, January 20, 2004, the President of the United States gave one of the most conservative State of the Union addresses in at least a generation. For a SOTU speech, it had a remarkably short spending wish list. Instead, it had passages such as those excerpted below — none of which would have been spoken by a Democrat or liberal (i.e., Leftist), or even a "RINO." Check it out:

[BEGIN EXCERPTS: Bold/underscore emphasis by Wolfstar]

Our greatest responsibility is the active defense of the American people. Twenty-eight months have passed since September 11th, 2001 — over two years without an attack on American soil. And it is tempting to believe that the danger is behind us. That hope is understandable, comforting — and false.

[SNIP]

The once all-powerful ruler of Iraq was found in a hole, and now sits in a prison cell. Of the top 55 officials of the former regime, we have captured or killed 45. Our forces are on the offensive, leading over 1,600 patrols a day and conducting an average of 180 raids a week. We are dealing with these thugs in Iraq, just as surely as we dealt with Saddam Hussein's evil regime.

Because of American leadership and resolve, the world is changing for the better. Last month, the leader of Libya voluntarily pledged to disclose and dismantle all of his regime's weapons of mass destruction programs, including a uranium enrichment project for nuclear weapons.

[SNIP]

Nine months of intense negotiations involving the United States and Great Britain succeeded with Libya, while 12 years of diplomacy with Iraq did not. And one reason is clear: For diplomacy to be effective, words must be credible, and no one can now doubt the word of America.

Many of our troops are listening tonight. And I want you and your families to know: America is proud of you. And my administration, and this Congress, will give you the resources you need to fight and win the war on terror.

I know that some people question if America is really in a war at all. They view terrorism more as a crime, a problem to be solved mainly with law enforcement and indictments. After the World Trade Center was first attacked in 1993, some of the guilty were indicted and tried and convicted, and sent to prison. But the matter was not settled. The terrorists were still training and plotting in other nations, and drawing up more ambitious plans. After the chaos and carnage of September the 11th, it is not enough to serve our enemies with legal papers. The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States, and war is what they got.

[SNIP]

Some critics have said our duties in Iraq must be internationalized. This particular criticism is hard to explain to our partners in Britain, Australia, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Thailand, Italy, Spain, Poland, Denmark, Hungary, Bulgaria, Ukraine, Romania, the Netherlands — (applause) — Norway, El Salvador, and the 17 other countries that have committed troops to Iraq. As we debate at home, we must never ignore the vital contributions of our international partners, or dismiss their sacrifices.

From the beginning, America has sought international support for our operations in Afghanistan and Iraq, and we have gained much support. There is a difference, however, between leading a coalition of many nations, and submitting to the objections of a few. America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our country.

We also hear doubts that democracy is a realistic goal for the greater Middle East, where freedom is rare. Yet it is mistaken, and condescending, to assume that whole cultures and great religions are incompatible with liberty and self-government. I believe that God has planted in every human heart the desire to live in freedom. And even when that desire is crushed by tyranny for decades, it will rise again.

[SNIP]

In the last three years, adversity has also revealed the fundamental strengths of the American economy. We have come through recession, and terrorist attack, and corporate scandals, and the uncertainties of war. And because you acted to stimulate our economy with tax relief, this economy is strong, and growing stronger.

You have doubled the child tax credit from $500 to $1,000, reduced the marriage penalty, begun to phase out the death tax, reduced taxes on capital gains and stock dividends, cut taxes on small businesses, and you have lowered taxes for every American who pays income taxes.

Americans took those dollars and put them to work, driving this economy forward. The pace of economic growth in the third quarter of 2003 was the fastest in nearly 20 years; new home construction, the highest in almost 20 years; home ownership rates, the highest ever. Manufacturing activity is increasing. Inflation is low. Interest rates are low. Exports are growing. Productivity is high, and jobs are on the rise.

These numbers confirm that the American people are using their money far better than government would have — and you were right to return it.

[SNIP]

We're requiring higher standards [in schools]. We are regularly testing every child on the fundamentals. We are reporting results to parents, and making sure they have better options when schools are not performing.

[SNIP]

We must continue to pursue an aggressive, pro-growth economic agenda. Congress has some unfinished business on the issue of taxes. The tax reductions you passed are set to expire. Unless you act — (applause) — unless you act — unless you act, the unfair tax on marriage will go back up. Unless you act, millions of families will be charged $300 more in federal taxes for every child. Unless you act, small businesses will pay higher taxes. Unless you act, the death tax will eventually come back to life. Unless you act, Americans face a tax increase. What Congress has given, the Congress should not take away. For the sake of job growth, the tax cuts you passed should be permanent.

Our agenda for jobs and growth must help small business owners and employees with relief from needless federal regulation, and protect them from junk and frivolous lawsuits.

Consumers and businesses need reliable supplies of energy to make our economy run — so I urge you to pass legislation to modernize our electricity system, promote conservation, and make America less dependent on foreign sources of energy.

My administration is promoting free and fair trade to open up new markets for America's entrepreneurs and manufacturers and farmers — to create jobs for American workers. Younger workers should have the opportunity to build a nest egg by saving part of their Social Security taxes in a personal retirement account. We should make the Social Security system a source of ownership for the American people.

[SNIP]

In two weeks, I will send you a budget that funds the war, protects the homeland, and meets important domestic needs, while limiting the growth in discretionary spending to less than 4 percent. This will require that Congress focus on priorities, cut wasteful spending, and be wise with the people's money. By doing so, we can cut the deficit in half over the next five years.

Tonight, I also ask you to reform our immigration laws so they reflect our values and benefit our economy.

[SNIP]

I oppose amnesty, because it would encourage further illegal immigration, and unfairly reward those who break our laws. My temporary worker program will preserve the citizenship path for those who respect the law, while bringing millions of hardworking men and women out from the shadows of American life.

[ED. NOTE: The precedent for guest worker programs goes back at least to the Eisenhower administration.]

[SNIP]

In January of 2006, seniors can get prescription drug coverage under Medicare. For a monthly premium of about $35, most seniors who do not have that coverage today can expect to see their drug bills cut roughly in half. Under this reform, senior citizens will be able to keep their Medicare just as it is, or they can choose a Medicare plan that fits them best — just as you, as members of Congress, can choose an insurance plan that meets your needs. And starting this year, millions of Americans will be able to save money tax-free for their medical expenses in a health savings account.

[SNIP]

On the critical issue of health care, our goal is to ensure that Americans can choose and afford private health care coverage that best fits their individual needs.

[SNIP]

Small businesses should be able to band together and negotiate for lower insurance rates, so they can cover more workers with health insurance. I urge you to pass association health plans. I ask you to give lower-income Americans a refundable tax credit that would allow millions to buy their own basic health insurance.

[SNIP]

To protect the doctor-patient relationship, and keep good doctors doing good work, we must eliminate wasteful and frivolous medical lawsuits. And tonight I propose that individuals who buy catastrophic health care coverage, as part of our new health savings accounts, be allowed to deduct 100 percent of the premiums from their taxes.

A government-run health care system is the wrong prescription. By keeping costs under control, expanding access, and helping more Americans afford coverage, we will preserve the system of private medicine that makes America's health care the best in the world.

[SNIP]

One of the worst decisions our children can make is to gamble their lives and futures on drugs. Our government is helping parents confront this problem with aggressive education, treatment, and law enforcement. Drug use in high school has declined by 11 percent over the last two years. Four hundred thousand fewer young people are using illegal drugs than in the year 2001.

[SNIP]

A strong America must also value the institution of marriage. I believe we should respect individuals as we take a principled stand for one of the most fundamental, enduring institutions of our civilization. Congress has already taken a stand on this issue by passing the Defense of Marriage Act, signed in 1996 by President Clinton. That statute protects marriage under federal law as a union of a man and a woman, and declares that one state may not redefine marriage for other states.

Activist judges, however, have begun redefining marriage by court order, without regard for the will of the people and their elected representatives. On an issue of such great consequence, the people's voice must be heard. If judges insist on forcing their arbitrary will upon the people, the only alternative left to the people would be the constitutional process. Our nation must defend the sanctity of marriage.

[SNIP]

It's also important to strengthen our communities by unleashing the compassion of America's religious institutions. Religious charities of every creed are doing some of the most vital work in our country — mentoring children, feeding the hungry, taking the hand of the lonely. Yet government has often denied social service grants and contracts to these groups, just because they have a cross or a Star of David or a crescent on the wall. By executive order, I have opened billions of dollars in grant money to competition that includes faith-based charities. Tonight I ask you to codify this into law, so people of faith can know that the law will never discriminate against them again.

[SNIP]

The momentum of freedom in our world is unmistakable — and it is not carried forward by our power alone. We can trust in that greater power who guides the unfolding of the years. And in all that is to come, we can know that His purposes are just and true.

[END EXCERPTS]


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; bushamnesty; sotu
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,141-1,1601,161-1,1801,181-1,200 ... 2,001-2,015 next last
To: gatorbait; Howlin
It's from a FReeper named "Zipporah" who lives in Kentucky. Howlin contacted both of Kentucky's Senatorial offices and determined that this is a false statement.
1,161 posted on 01/22/2004 1:36:41 PM PST by Poohbah ("Beware the fury of a patient man" -- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1157 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Can't find where clinton did anything to change immigration law but here's something that appears to show that it can be done through executive order.

http://www.ilw.com/lawyers/immigdaily/exec_branch/2004,0105-exec.shtm
1,162 posted on 01/22/2004 1:37:04 PM PST by Bikers4Bush (Constitution party here I come. Write in Tancredo in 04'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1138 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush; Howlin
n't need them. Already have em'.

This is wonderful news, then.Call them, get the aide's name and a direct quote and the aide's sources . Then you can put this to rest in a manner that should remove all doubt.

A win-win situation for all concerned.

1,163 posted on 01/22/2004 1:37:11 PM PST by gatorbait (Yesterday, today and tomorrow......The United States Army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1126 | View Replies]

To: gatorbait
You get no argument from me about this. On his bad days , he is better than any of the dwarves or Hillary! on a good day.As for the third party types. well, again, they might want to visit the Pat Buchanan Presidential Library for solace.

Just because the majority of republicans will still vote for Bush that doesn't mean his positions aren't liberal. Republicans fall prey to GROUPTHINK or the herd instinct as much as the liberals do. The majority is often wrong, especially in a country that gave >50% to Gore. So, I don't care if 85% of republicans back Bush, he's still liberal on many issues. That is a fact.

People who put party before principle are logically more prone to fall prey to groupthink. But arguments are won on the issues and logic, not on majority vote.

1,164 posted on 01/22/2004 1:37:57 PM PST by exmarine ( sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1151 | View Replies]

Somebody needs to show me where Executive Orders are in the Constitution. I can't seem to find it.
1,165 posted on 01/22/2004 1:38:47 PM PST by Your Nightmare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1162 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
All you've proven is that they now won't admit it which to be honest is really no surprise.

And if you read the post from Zapporah it was from someone he knew. Not an official announcement.
1,166 posted on 01/22/2004 1:39:00 PM PST by Bikers4Bush (Constitution party here I come. Write in Tancredo in 04'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1143 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
There will be money needed to set up a Guest Worker Program.

Appropriations for that would have to come through Congress. Bush can't spend money Congress hasn't authorized.

1,167 posted on 01/22/2004 1:39:47 PM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1162 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter
Of course I made that post, in response to another. If you didn't read all of the posts, you can't testify to context. So rave on if you wish, this is boring. Why you took up this nonsense is anyone's guess, it has nothing to do with the thread. It's just a continuation of a flame war by Howlin, who doesn't like to be asked to back up inane statements designed to worship her idol and mislead others.

Ta ta, I'm gone for the day. Have fun with whatever your agenda is.

1,168 posted on 01/22/2004 1:40:10 PM PST by Protagoras (When they asked me what I thought of freedom in America,,, I said I thought it would be a good idea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1156 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
No I was saying that it had been reported that that was his intention.
1,169 posted on 01/22/2004 1:40:35 PM PST by Bikers4Bush (Constitution party here I come. Write in Tancredo in 04'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1150 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
Which is exactly what I've said, we shall see.
1,170 posted on 01/22/2004 1:41:35 PM PST by Bikers4Bush (Constitution party here I come. Write in Tancredo in 04'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1159 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
Yep .. reported by a senator's aid with no name .. right?
1,171 posted on 01/22/2004 1:41:35 PM PST by Mo1 (Join the dollar a day crowd now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1169 | View Replies]

To: exmarine
Are you saying I am unprincipled if I vote for Bush?
1,172 posted on 01/22/2004 1:41:36 PM PST by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1164 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
You may just well be one of the biggest frauds I have ever seen on FR.

And it doesn't matter WHO he knows. They don't know what they are talking about.
1,173 posted on 01/22/2004 1:42:20 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1166 | View Replies]

To: exmarine
"People who put party before principle are logically more prone to fall prey to groupthink. But arguments are won on the issues and logic, not on majority vote."

The arguments here for Bush, are the same arguments the left uses on why any Democrat is better than a Republican..Bush goes left on some issues, right on others...or he chickens out on SCOTUS....I am a conservative first, a Republican second!

Semper Fi


1,174 posted on 01/22/2004 1:42:40 PM PST by international american (support our troops...........................revoke Hillary's visa!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1164 | View Replies]

To: Porterville
No, I think they could hire citizens at minimum wage atleast if they need people in the fields. The "Americans won't do those jobs" talk is pure BS. Both of my parents worked in cotton fields when they were young along with a lot of other Americans and I'm sure plenty could still be found to work the fields if needed. Bush suggesting that Americans won't do those jobs is an insult to Americans.
1,175 posted on 01/22/2004 1:42:51 PM PST by honeygrl (If you think the Constitution Party is such a joke, then why do you seem so afraid of it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1106 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Money? Have you seen the budget for the dept. of homeland defense?

1,176 posted on 01/22/2004 1:43:04 PM PST by Bikers4Bush (Constitution party here I come. Write in Tancredo in 04'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1167 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
I think many (not all) of the naysayers have serious emotional problems. Their inability to break themselves of the same focus and comments day after day after day after day is symtomatic of obsessive-compulsive behavior at the very least. Their "moral equivalency" viewpoint which sees absolutely no distinction between Bush and the Democrats shows a serious inability to discern differences in morality. Frankly, some of the naysayers on FR scare me. I'd never have them in my home or anywhere near my family.

Gee, life is so much simpler once you finally realize that all who might disagree with you are either evil or crazy or both.

Of course, there are cynics (not me of course) who might assert that your own remarks are a textbook description of paranoia.

Practicing psychiatry via packet-switched network is such a rare ability. I've often wondered why there isn't much demand for such mental health services.
1,177 posted on 01/22/2004 1:43:13 PM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 994 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
I think many (not all) of the naysayers have serious emotional problems. Their inability to break themselves of the same focus and comments day after day after day after day is symtomatic of obsessive-compulsive behavior at the very least. Their "moral equivalency" viewpoint which sees absolutely no distinction between Bush and the Democrats shows a serious inability to discern differences in morality. Frankly, some of the naysayers on FR scare me. I'd never have them in my home or anywhere near my family.

Gee, life is so much simpler once you finally realize that all who might disagree with you are either evil or crazy or both.

Of course, there are cynics (not me of course) who might assert that your own remarks are a textbook description of paranoia.

Practicing psychiatry via packet-switched network is such a rare ability. I've often wondered why there isn't much demand for such mental health services.
1,178 posted on 01/22/2004 1:43:14 PM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 994 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
AKA: An Anonymous Source.
1,179 posted on 01/22/2004 1:43:32 PM PST by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1171 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
Fortunately, the Founders didn't believe in such nonsense. The historical basis for voting was that of the privilege of property owners.

A common misconception but that isn't how all states were. New England states not only went beyond the all freemen living in the jurisdiction, but those freemen included blacks. A nasty little rumour ad it that Connecticut allowed women to vote for a few years under the Articles. Historical basis was the enlightened electorate, educated and with roots in their districts.

But keep reaching for reasons to justify abrogation of civic duty.

The Founding Fathers knew that a democracy could survive only if the citizens exercised their franchise responsibly, knowledgeably, and faithfully.

We aren't compelled to vote by some nutcase murderous dictator. And refusing to vote does send a message to the parties, one that they can read quite well even if FR's Bushbot contingent can't figure it out

No, we are not compelled to vote. Civic responsibility should be enough of a motivation.

Not voting doesn't send any kind of powerful message to the parties.

The message not voting sends is that most voters don't give a s**t no matter what the politicians do.

So the parties and politicians focus more and more on the minority groups and special interest groups that do vote. The parties feel that a focus on presenting views, educating about the important issues facing the nation is a waste. Why care about those who don't care enough to vote? Instead, focus on the few that do vote - buy their votes, pander, and don't don't worry about the good of the nation or what the majority might think.

Because the majority of voters don't bother.

Whether it's because of apathy or a selfish 'message', the republic is failing because of the horrendous lack of responsibility and duty in the electorate.

1,180 posted on 01/22/2004 1:43:46 PM PST by Ophiucus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 696 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,141-1,1601,161-1,1801,181-1,200 ... 2,001-2,015 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson