If they're not Patsies then they're most likely to be Keyesters, Losertarians or Constipationists.
Aren't we cute. You have an insult for all sorts of groups and individuals, who put principles ahead of expediency; but not arguments against their arguments. I suppose "Keyesters" is supposed to be a slam against Alan Keyes, who I guess embarrasses you because he does not trim his sales to curry favor. I suppose "Losertarians" is intended as a slam against the Libertarian party, which takes stands based upon their honest beliefs, whether calculated to appeal to everyone or not. I am not sure what you mean by Constipationists, but if you mean those of us who believe the Constitution must be respected and adhered to, then you truly are beneath contempt.
You obviously would rather slander than debate. But you know what is funny? That may work with shy coeds in College class rooms, it merely makes you look ridiculous on this forum, where people regularly advance arguments, as well as insults. And those surfing by are usually able to determine who is able to argue for a position, and who must depend purely on the latter approach.
William Flax Return Of The Gods Web Site
Yeah, yada, yada, yada, blah, blah, blah. Stick your smug, childish replies where the sun doesn't shine.
Almost all the folks you're talking about voted for GWB (many with considerable misgivings) and hoped for the best. .
He won by a whisker last time. There will be myriad conservatives not voting for him this time.
Frothing hatred does not become you.