Skip to comments.
MEXICAN NEWSPAPER (El Sol de Mexico) Front Page: "USA To Offer Visas to 8 Million Illegals"
El Sol de Mexico (in Spanish) ^
| 7 January 2004
| El Sol de Mexico (Daily)
Posted on 01/07/2004 8:47:28 AM PST by AmericanInTokyo
Front Page of Mexican Daily Newspaper "El Sol de Mexico"
Headline: "U.S.A. To Offer Visas to 8 Million Illegals"
January 4, 2004
The link to the full article is above, in Spanish. Somebody might wish to Babelfish/translate it.
The subheads are, as translated in English: "Bush Announces Migratory Plan...Offer is to 8 Million Illegals...by Carmen Flores, Correspondent"
The first paragraph:
(From original Spanish) "President Bush of the United States has decided in a migratory plan which will result in in temporary employment for three years for 8 million illegal (immigrants), the majority of whom come from Mexico. This plan needs to be approved by the US Congress."
(Excerpt) Read more at elsoldemexico.com.mx ...
TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Canada; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Cuba; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Germany; Government; Israel; Japan; Mexico; Russia; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2004; 8million; aliens; amnestia; amnesty; borders; custom; debate; election; fox; illegals; immigrantlist; jorgeabustos; language; law; lawbreakers; mexico; rove; undocumented; visas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
Comments? Thoughts?
Any other press worldwide on this? In Tokyo, Japan in Sankei Shimbun News today, for example, they CLEARLY called it, in Japanese, the legalization of millions of illegal aliens, in an effort to secure Latino votes for 2004.
To: AmericanInTokyo
Good catch!
Last night I was trying to read what the Mexican take on this was.
This does not surprise me.
2
posted on
01/07/2004 8:49:11 AM PST
by
OXENinFLA
To: AmericanInTokyo
Happy New Year, AIT...haven't spoke at ya in while...I'll wait for a translation..but it occurs to me that evennif Congress shoots it down cold...the mere fact that W proposed it might be enough to get Fox re-elected in Mexico...he was perceived as being in BIG trouble....now, he can say that he's responsible for the process getting started..
3
posted on
01/07/2004 8:51:42 AM PST
by
ken5050
To: ken5050
Interesting point, Ken. Feliz y prosper ano nuevo. Thanks.
4
posted on
01/07/2004 8:52:59 AM PST
by
AmericanInTokyo
(I argue as passionately on FR against ILLEGAL ALIENS as I would if Gore, not Bush were President.)
To: *immigrant_list; A Navy Vet; Lion Den Dan; Free the USA; Libertarianize the GOP; madfly; B4Ranch; ..
ping
To: gubamyster
Head for the tall grass, here they come.
Thanks alot, George.
6
posted on
01/07/2004 8:55:05 AM PST
by
skeeter
(Fac ut vivas)
To: OXENinFLA
7
posted on
01/07/2004 8:56:46 AM PST
by
OXENinFLA
To: AmericanInTokyo
This cements it for me I'm not voting for Bush. Other than the War on Terror what has GWB done that can be considered conservative? He's done more to push a liberal agenda than a conservative agenda.
I didn't like these stupid liberal policies under Clinton and just because Bush has an "R" after his name doesn't mean I will support them now.
To: AmericanInTokyo
De nada...and BTW, to follow my train of thought..is it possible that this whole thing is a present from Bush to Fox?...
9
posted on
01/07/2004 8:59:56 AM PST
by
ken5050
To: ken5050
Yes, it is a 'regalo' to the Fox. At least, that is how I perceive the second or third paragraph of the article. Sad, but true. We call them as they are here on FR.
It's certainly no gift to the Republic. Nor conservatives in his Bush's own party for that matter!
10
posted on
01/07/2004 9:03:37 AM PST
by
AmericanInTokyo
(I argue as passionately on FR against ILLEGAL ALIENS as I would if Gore, not Bush were President.)
To: ken5050
...the mere fact that W proposed it might be enough to get Fox re-elected in Mexico...he was perceived as being in BIG trouble....now, he can say that he's responsible for the process getting started..>>>>>
NO "re-elects" for presidents in mexico, do your 6 yrs, then retire on your 5 Million (US) dollars per yr.
Fox's PAN party lost many seats in the last elections. Looks like the PRI is set to be back in power come 2006.
11
posted on
01/07/2004 9:05:18 AM PST
by
txdoda
("Navy-brat")
To: ken5050
It is indeed a 'regalo de epiphania' for Senor Fox's PAN party, if anything else (as was brought up, there are term limits in Mexico).
12
posted on
01/07/2004 9:09:30 AM PST
by
AmericanInTokyo
(I argue as passionately on FR against ILLEGAL ALIENS as I would if Gore, not Bush were President.)
To: AmericanInTokyo; gubamyster; skeeter
Just in case we need a refresher on why Mr. Bush's plan is bad for this country...Let's review:
Egyptian brothers Mahmud Abouhalima and Mohammed Abouhalima, both here on expired visas, won amnesty under a farmworker program after cooking up bogus claims. They went on to participate in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. Section 245(i) beneficiary Hashem Mohamed Hadayet entered with a tourist visa in 1992, "only" overstayed for five years, and then applied successfully for legal permanent residency under 245(i) when his wife hit the Diversity Visa lottery jackpot (another immigration abomination that benefits illegal aliens). He went on to gun down two people at the El Al Israel Airlines counter at Los Angeles International Airport on July 4.
Michelle Malkin
August 2, 2002 The Wall Street Journal's immigration foul http://www.jewishworldreview.com/michelle/malkin080202.asp
What really urinates me off is that radio guys like Hugh Hewitt will do one of the following:
1. Dodge this issue completely by continuing to talk about Howard Dean (who is in the process of committing suicide).
2. Trot out some immigration opponent that is a blatant racist and paint all of the opposition with the same brush.
3. Something about the "political realities" and say, "Well, this is as good as its going to get so you better support our president. After all how much worse would it be with a Democrat...yadda yadda...
4. Maybe have someone like Michelle Malkin on but only in the last 45 minutes of the program when, face it, nobody is listening. It is a reality in talk radio, listenership declines drastically in the evening hours after drive time.
13
posted on
01/07/2004 9:22:54 AM PST
by
AreaMan
To: AmericanInTokyo
First things first, Mr Bush!!
Should Mexico reform its political and economic policies as a condition of any liberalized U.S. immigration policy?
|
|
Yes
|
|
81%
|
1573 votes
|
|
No
|
|
19%
|
377 votes
|
Total: 1950 votes
|
|
|
This QuickVote is not scientific and reflects the opinions of only those Internet users who have chosen to participate. The results cannot be assumed to represent the opinions of Internet users in general, nor the public as a whole. The QuickVote sponsor is not responsible for content, functionality or the opinions expressed therein.
|
|
[poll at www.cnn.com/lou |
14
posted on
01/07/2004 9:26:09 AM PST
by
AgThorn
(Go go Bush!! But don't turn your back on America with "immigrant amnesty")
Comment #15 Removed by Moderator
To: AmericanInTokyo
I have no idea what Van electorero plan migratorio de Bush means:
16
posted on
01/07/2004 9:49:47 AM PST
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: txdoda
Fox's PAN party lost many seats in the last elections. Looks like the PRI is set to be back in power come 2006.Fox is already a lame duck, even though he has 3 years remaining. He desperately needs a credibility makeover, and Bush is going to be the beautician.
To: AmericanInTokyo
This rush for the border should make the Oklahoma land rush look pretty tame...
Look out property owners along the border...business should be pretty brisk...
imo
18
posted on
01/07/2004 9:58:54 AM PST
by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
To: AgThorn
Current poll results from www.michaelsavage.com:
|
SHOULD WE LEGALIZE ILLEGAL ALIENS? |
YES(826,289) |
7% |
|
NO(10,524,643) |
93% |
|
|
11,350,932 total votes since 12/10/03
|
|
|
[I added commas to numbers and red to total; otherwise, the results are as posted on his website.]
19
posted on
01/07/2004 9:59:49 AM PST
by
TomGuy
To: AmericanInTokyo
I think the statue of liberty needs a different pose.....bent over would be more appropriate
imo
20
posted on
01/07/2004 10:00:07 AM PST
by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson